A contempt case filed for alleged flouting of an order in a prior writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal by letter, citing no representation on the day of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’ABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 202 OF 2021
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of CourtsAct 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for flouting the orderofthisHon'bleCourtin W.P.No.10525 of 2020 dt.23.06.2020 by the Hon’ble HighCourt
BETWEEN:-
Muppalla Mary Victoria, W/o. M Krupananda Rao, Aged about 78 years, Occ. Agriculture/ Senior Citizen, Presently R/o.H.No.8-361/8, M.N. Reddy Nagar, Phase-I Chintal, Qutubullapur, Medchal District, Telangana, 500055.
...CONTEMNOR/PETITIONER
AND
Sri. P. Ch. Venkaiah, S/o. Not Known to the Petitioner, Aged about 55 years, Occ. Mandal Revenue Officer, Macherla Mandal, Office at The Mandal Revenue Office, Macherla Mandal, Guntur District.
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):- SRI. BANDI SAI VAMSHI
Counsel for the Respondents:- GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010053572021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3233]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 202/2021
Between:
Muppalla Mary Victoria
...PETITIONER
AND
Sri P Ch Venkaiah
...CONTEMNOR
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.BANDI SAI VAMSHI
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
r
2
The Court made the following Order:
No representation for the petitioner. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter dated 25.10.2024 to the Registrar (Judicial) seeking withdrawal of the contemptcase.
As a sequel. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. TATA RAO
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
SSL
ns
—
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/11/2024
ORDER
CC.NO.202 OF 2021
prof
is: 2 5 FEB 2C25
’VS'
^ Current Section ^
CONTEMPT CASE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Muppalla Mary Victoria
Sri P Ch Venkaiah
B Krishna Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
