Appeal against judgment and decree in OS No. 16 of 2009 dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel reported no instructions; miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR
APPEAL SUIT NO: 759 OF
Appeal Under Section 96 and Order 41 RmIp 1 nf r p r ^ x.. S^the 13-8-2015 in OS No. 16 of 2009 on the file oftheCourt of the X Additional District and Sessions Judge, Machilipatnam, Krishna District.^ Between:
Parmarthi Pothuraju, S/o. Ramayya R/o D.No. 19/700/8, Chilakalapudi, Machilipatnam, Krishna District.
...APPELLANT
AND
&pln;m^%“hna G-dhinagar,
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA
Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared
The Court made the following:
1
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DR.V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR
APPEAL SUIT No.759 of 2015
JUDGMENT ;
- This appeal has been coming up under the caption Tor dismissal’. On earlier occasions it was adjourned at request of learned counsel for appellant, to enablelearned counsel to obtain instructions from the client. Todaythe learned counsel for the appellant is present and reported no instructions.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any, stand
closed.
SDI- M. RAME SH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
DV
PVD p ^
HIGH COURT
DATED:02/01/2024
ORDER
AS.No.759 of 2015
^ or
%
ifar o
3 0 4PP 202^ n:
!!
5^ Se.'^lion
DISMISSED AS NON- PROSECUTION
C Cop'd^
Parmarthi Pothuraju
Dr V R K Krupa Sagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
