Appeal under Section 96 CPC against findings on possession and denial of 24% interest in a decree from O.S. No. 130 of 2013, Principal District Judge, Nellore. On the appellants' letter and submission, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
SATURDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
FIRST APPEAL NO: 349 OF 2023
Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C. aggrieved by thefindingasregardsto possession on issue No. 3 and also aggrieved by thedecreetotheextentof not granting interest @ 24 percent per annum from thedateofsuit till the date of realisation by judgment and decree dt. 31.1.2023passedinO.S.No.130of 2013 on the file of court of the Principal District Judge, Nellore, the above named appellants beg to present this Memorandum ofregularappeal.
BETWEEN:-
...APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS
-.-rz?
AND
/
...RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS
Counsel for the Appellant(s):- SRI. ARAVALA SREENIVASARAO. Counsel for the Respondents: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
r
APHC010272392023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3494]
SATURDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
APPEAL SUIT NO: 349/2023
Between:
Anumala Setty Vasudeva Varaprasada Rao S/o. Subba Rao, aged about 60 years, R/o. H.No.15-4-55, Pedda Bazar, Kandukur village Post and Mandal, Prakasam District and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND
Tellapalli Raghavaiah, S/o.Polaiah Aged 70 years, R/o.D.No.24-2-435, Saraswati Nagar, Dargamitta, Nellore and another ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. ARAVALA SREENIVASARAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.
The Court made the following Judgment: (per NJS,J)
In view of the letter dated 18.11.2024, addressed to the Registrar and the submission made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
As a sequel, all pending applications shall also standdismissed.
SD/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
/Or
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
P-T’-..*-
■/'
ssl
ns
&
HIGH COURT
DATED:23/11/2024
ORDER
[3=ItD 0 'f MAR 2025 6*
Current deciion
pffSPATCV^^:^
AS.N0.349 OF 2023
APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN.
ssl
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anumala Setty Vasudeva Varaprasada Rao
Beesa Nageswara Rao
Gurram Venkata Rao
Kota Chinnaiah
Gurram Srinivasulu
Tellapalli Raghavaiah
Ninala Jayasurya
Sumathi Jagadam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
