The appellant sought permission to withdraw a first appeal against a decree, stating the matter was settled out of court. The court granted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. RAVINDRA BABU
FIRST APPEAL NO: 1216 OF 2017
Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and Decree Dated 20/07/2017 in O.S.No.61 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, at Kurnool.
BETWEEN:-
P.Andrynamma, W/o. Late P.Chandra Sekhar aged about57years,Housewife, R/o. H.N0.81/5-Q-1, Swamy Reddy Nagar Near ITC Company,KurnoolCity.
...APPELLANT (DEFENDANT)
AND
(Both are R/o. H.No.8-3-8, Krishna Nagar, Kurnool City.)
...RESPONDENTS (PLAINTIFFS)
LA. NO: 1 OF 2017(ASMP. NO: 3045 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 3 days in filing the above appeal.
Counsel for the Appellant:- SRI. J JANAKIRAMI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents:-
The Court made the following ORDER:-
APHCO 1^)918922017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3364]
FRIDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
TH^ HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A V RAVINDRA BABU
FIRST APPEAL NO: 1216 OF 2017
Between:
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant(s): SRI J JANAKIRAMI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents:
The Court made the following judgment:
Sri B.V.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the Appeal, as the matter is settled out of the Court.
Considering the same, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There
shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
Sd /- M.S.V. NAVEEN CHANDRA DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTION OFFICER
- The Principal District Judge, at Kurnool.
- One CG to Sri. J. Janakirami Reddy, Advocate fOPUCl
- THREE C D Copies. SSL AL
;p.
HIGH COURT
DATED:01/03/2024
JUDGMENT AS.N0.1216 0F 2017
OF AMO#^
S. 2 8 MAY 20?^ Oil
^^^SPATCV'^
APPEAL SUIT IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
SSL
2 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Andrynamma
M.Shankaramma (died per L.Rs.)
M.Prabhakar Reddy
M.Ravindra Reddy
A.V. RAVINDRA BABU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
