Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad dismissed Writ Petition No. 9490 of 2022 as withdrawn by the petitioner. Associated interlocutory applications were also closed without costs.
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
p
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY. THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 9490 OF 2022
Between:
D. Swathi, D/o late D. Gangadhar, Aged about 30 years, R/o. D.No.6/607-1 Sankarapuram Street, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Petition, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in trying to issue appointment orders to the 6th Respondent on compassionate grounds basing on the fake certificates submitted by him and the Letter No.13001HR/Estt./2018, dated 28-8-2021 issued by the 2 nd Respondent as wholly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently declare that the 6th Respondentisnotentitledtobe appointed on compassionate grounds.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Between:
Petitioner/Respondent
AND
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the respondents to file Counter Affidavit in W.P.No.9490 of 2022.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to issue any appointment orders on compassionate grounds to the 6**^ Respondent till the disposal of O.S.No.1246 of 2021pending before the Court of III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa.
Counsel for the Petitloner:SRI. KIRTHI TEJA KONDAVEETI
Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI. G. RAMESH REDDY
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No.9490 of 2022
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri V.Madhusudhana Rao, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Kirthi Teja Kondaveeti,Ld.Counsel for the Writ Petitioner.
- Both the Letters are taken on record.
- Request granted.
- Accordingly, the Writ Petition
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No Order as to costs.
- Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed interms of this Order.
Sd/- K. SRINIV, ^A RAJU ASSISTAI^ra GISTRAR fs t { //TRUE COPY// SECJIO
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:18/12/2023
ORDER
WP.No.9490 of 2022
y^PP
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
D. Swathi
State of Andhra Pradesh
Dandu Rajendra Prasad
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
