The petitioner's writ petition challenging the university's decision not to admit him to duty was dismissed for lack of non-prosecution as no counsel appeared for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 5362 OF 2018
Between:
N. Rakesh, S/o N.Raju aged about 31 years, R/o H.No.87/1108-M/1- 17/A, Mother Land, C-Block, Kurnool.
...PETITIONER
AND
Rayalaseema University, rep. by its Registrar, Kurnool.
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not admitting the petitioner to duty as per the appointmentorderdated22.6.2017as arbitrary and illegal and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to admit the petitioner to duty with all the consequential benefits.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying thatinthecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to admit the petitioner to duty in pursuance of his appointment letter dated 22.6.2017 as per his selection, pending disposal of writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. THOTA GOPINATH
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI P HARINATH GUPTA
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRAAAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION No.5362 of 2018
ORDER:
Despite the matter posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none represented for the petitioner.
The docket proceedings dated 10.11.2023 and 03.11.2023alsoshow none represented for the petitioner. It appears theyhavenointerestin prosecuting the matter.
Sri P.Harinath Gupta, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent is in attendance.
In that view, the Writ Petitior, is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall
stand closed.
Sd /- B. CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT\REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
To,
SECnON OFFICER
O SRI. THOTA GOPINATH Advocate [OPUCl 2. One CC to SRI. P HARINATH GUPTA Advocate [OPUCl 3. Three CD Copies Madhu SK
HIGH COURT
DATED:23/11/2023
ORDER
WP.No.5362 of 2018
5cof^'e5 nlsls^i
■a:z
V- c; ■v
A •o'
75 V
S^. %
^5
r<br>r*
DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N. Rakesh
Rayalaseema University
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
