C Srinivasa Rao v. the State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition challenging reference proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, the high court held that since the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority passed an order on the disputed land, nothing remained to be adjudicated in this writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed without any order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions stand dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
SB
io
WRIT PETITION NO: 4389 OF 2019
Between:
Cherukuru Srinivasa Rao, R/o. Konide narajupalem Village Ballikurava Mandal, Prakasham District Andhra Pradesh.
...PETITIONER
AND
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department represented by its Principal Secretary, Velagapudi Amaravathi Mandal, Guntur Andhra Pradesh
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the reference proceedings under Section 77(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 has any survival given the subsequent order by the Authority.
Whether the High Court should adjudicate the merits of the writ petition after the Authority passed an order on the disputed land.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Cherukuru Srinivasa Rao
- respondent
State of Andhra Pradesh
- respondent
Principal Secretary, Major Irrigation Dept.
- respondent
Gonugunta Bujjamma
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/4389/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court