G.V. Raghavendra Prasad v. The Anantapur Municipal Corporation
Case brief
What is this about?
The Writ Petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as no representation was filed on behalf of the petitioner on the date of hearing.
The Writ Petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as no representation was filed on behalf of the petitioner on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
W.P. No. 33058 OF 2010
ORDER :
Though the matter is listed today under the caption dismissal, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner herein has no interest in prosecuting the Writ Petition.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this case, shall
stand closed.
__________________ A.V. SESHA SAI, J
Date: 21.02.2023 Ks
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
W.P. No.33058 OF 2010
Date:21.02.2023
Ks
A.V. Seshasai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court