Petitioner filed a writ petition declaring respondents' actions illegal and seeking permission to visit a holy place. Counsel submitted the cause no longer survives, leading this court to dismiss the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SWIT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 30068 OF 2023
Between;
Shaik Abdul Raheed, S/o Chansa, aged about 45 years, Occ: medical representative, R/o Srinivasaraopet, 60 feet road, Guntur Town, Guntur District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Petition, order or direction more in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the actions of the 3'*^ respondents in interfering and obstructing the petitioner is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Art. 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to obstruct the petitioner, and grant the petitioner permit to visit the petitioner holy place.
lA NO; 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to obstruct the petitioner, and grant the petitioner
/
(
permit to visit the petitioner holy place of maldcafrom19-11-2023to06-12-2023 pending disposal of the main writ.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI. HARISH KUMAR.T
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
%
HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No.30068 of 2023
ORDER:
Heard Sri K.Ganesh Raghavendra, learned counsel representing T.Harish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit thatthecause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudicationandthatthe Writ Petition has become infructuous and the same was endorsed on the file by the learned counsel.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition isdismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending
shall stand closed.
Sd/- P.VIblPD KUMAR ASSIST GISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEGtlOM OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SRI. HARISH KUMAR.T, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.[OUT] 3. Three C.D.Copies nm
d
HIGH COURT
DATED:22/11/2023
ORDER
WP.No.30068 of 2023
DISMISSING THE WPAS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Shaik Abdul Raheed
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Venkata Jyotirmai Pratapa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
