Disposed

Bangari Jaya v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC20 Feb 2023WP/2749/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition regarding non-consideration of a representation for compassionate appointment. Without merits, the court directed the petitioner to submit a fresh representation within ten days for consideration within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to submit fresh representation within ten days for authorities to consider within four weeks.

Bangari Jaya Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh — Service and Employment | Andhra Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶2

WRIT PETITION No. 2749 of 2023

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Article

¶5

226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs:

¶6

“...to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2^nd respondent in not considering the representation dated 16.11.2022 for Compassionate Appointment as well as in not providing employment to the petitioner under compassionate grounds as being illegal, arbitrary and also oppose to all cannons of justice consequentially direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 16.11.2022 for Compassionate Appointment and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” (in verbatim)

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶8

Government Pleader for Higher Education appearing for the 1^st respondent and learned standing counsel appearing for the 2^nd respondent.

¶9

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner mainly submits that a direction may be given to the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 16.11.2022 submitted to the 2^nd respondent, for which learned Government Pleader for Higher Education submits that the petitioner’s representation dated 16.11.2022 is not available at the Office of the 2^nd respondent and if the petitioner submit a

¶10

¶11

representation afresh, the same may be considered by the respondents within a reasonable time, in accordance with law.

¶12

Having regard to the submissions made by both the learned counsels and in the facts and circumstances of the case, (without going into the merits of the case), the Writ Petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit a representation afresh within a period of ten days from today and on receipt of such representation, the respondents shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of four (04) weeks thereafter. It is made clear that the respondents will consider the petitioner’s representation on merits and in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶13

As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

¶14

20^th February, 2023. cbn

¶15

______________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J

¶16

¶17

201

¶18

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶19

W.P.No.2749 of 2023

¶20

20^th February, 2023

¶21

CBN

Bangari Jaya v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bangari Jaya v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madasu Premchand, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

P Venkata Ratnam Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

M Mahabub Basha Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

K Guruswamy, Vs The Assistant General Manager

Karri Shyamala Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Koyya Venkata Rakesh Kumar Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh