Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition which was then dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATHI
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.2692 of 2018
M/s.Novitas Infotech,
Rep. by its Manager Mr.G.J.Murali Reddy
…. Petitioner
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Department of Industries, and others
…. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.Venkat Challa Counsel for the respondents : GP for Industries & Commerce Ms.A. Jayanthi ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of
this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
Date: 24.11.2023
KSJ
M/s. Novitas Infotech, Rep. by its Manager Mr. G.J. Murali Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Ninala Jayasurya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
