The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a writ petition challenging tender conditions as infructuous on the submission that the matter did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAvl (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MARCp. TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYtvucmtv tupjiTHREE-i-
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SIWT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26284 OF 2017
Between:
Door No.44/38-NeaFp^n%a^ No. 162/2001) having its office at ^apa Andhra Pradesh repre^nted by iSS
' and -..petitioner ; Y2ia?udtS.nlurfe^°tM Secretariat. j^Velagapudh Guntur District Engineer R&B, «
f® O' Conewutton of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated Pleased to issue a wrft’of m2ndaX or anv declaring the action of the 3"* and 4^” resooLpntJ type hot mix plant 100 - 120 TPH wfthin 100 batch .an eligibility condition as per G O Rt No iVo T Tr 2017 to X participate in the tPnHpr No.2349(9)/^/(NH&CRF)/DEE 3/AEE/20l?ir H Tw .!??-?’■ ^IT widening and strengthening of Raiamoeta kJhin relating to to 30/0. 46/0 to 53/0 and 9'3/0 to -Thumkur Road from Km 25/0 discrimlnately and consequently dUct the 3^^^ resnonn''^? the petitioner for award of the wo?k notified in^hP^tu to consider the bid of mentioned above. tk notitied in the two tender notifications
lA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPiVIP. NO: 32588 OF 2017)
stated In the affidl^tS^n support^'^the^writ^^^n® crcumstances pleased to direct the Respondent No 3 to Court may be award of work notified in^without insistina fn? petitioner for within 100 Km distance from the site of work plant
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. A P REDDY
Th’eTo::^;^:&:?^g; * B-j-tDiNGs
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No. 26284 of 2017
ORDER:
M/s A.P.Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive, as such the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ
Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 3' SECTION^FFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. A P Reddy Advocate [OPUC] .. .-r, 2. Two CCs to GP for Roads & Buildings, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies PV MSR
'1
I '
HIGH COURT
DATED:29/03/2023
ORDER
WP.No.26284 of 2017
Si*
■^1
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Door No.44/38-NeaFp^n%a^ No. 162/2001)
Andhra Pradesh Government
V. SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
