The High Court directed the withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 23089 of 2012 and dismissed the petition on withdrawal. Consequently, pending interim orders were vacated.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim orders vacated; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
<br>
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION NO: 23089 OF 2012
Between:
Mula Viswanadham, S/o. Late M. Sankara Rao, Age: 45 years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o.8-18/1-101/1, Pradeep Nagar, Vizianagaram. ...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of a writ of "Mandamus" declaring the orders of the 1®* Respondent made in proceedings D.Dis.No.999/2011/KRC dated 16.04.2012 as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and thereby set aside the order of the 1®‘ Respondent iri D.Dis.No.999 /2011/ KRC dated 16.04.2012 and consequently set aside the proceedings Notice Rc.No. 1708/2012/E dated 19.06.2012 issued and initiated by the 2""^ Respondent.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2012fWPMP. NO: 29476 OF 20121
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders of the 1st Respondent made in proceedings D.Dis.No.999/2011/KRC dated 16.04.2012 pending the disposal of the writ petition.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 29477 OF 2012^
P®tition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the proceedings Notice Rc.No. 1708/2012/E dated 19.06.2012 issued and initiated by the 2 Respondent pending the disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATA SIVA KUMAR DEVARA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 7: SRI M. S. R. SUBRAHMANYAM
The Court made the following: ORDER
7
r
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
WRIT PETITION No. 23089 of 2012
JUDGMENT:
No representation for the petitioner.
wishes to settle the issue amicably out of the Court and wants to withdraw the 'writ petition.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in
consequence.
//TRUE COPY//
SDI- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / CC'-
SECTION OFFICER
To,
y
■-*
HIGH COURT
DATED:14/12/2023
ORDER
WP.No.23089 of 2012
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN AS PRAYED WITHOUT COSTS
4
0<br>
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition needs to be allowed or dismissed.
Whether the interim orders need to be vacated.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mula Viswanadham
The Joint Collector, Vizianagaram
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizianagaram
The Tahsildar, Vizianagaram
Dubba Ananda Krishna
Dubba Rama Rao
Ravi Nath Tilhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
