In W.P. No. 1870 of 2016 challenging the selection of an Anganwadi worker, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition for default due to the petitioner's non-appearance on the day posted for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVifi (Special Original Jurisdiction) f
MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 1870 OF 2016
Between:
S.Susheelamma W/o Venkata Naik, Aged about 24 years, Occ; Unemployed, R/o Y.G.Thanda (v), Thuggali (M), Kurnool District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularlyoneinnatureofwritof Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent 2 to 4 in selecting the Respondent no.5 for the post of Anganwadi worker for the Y.G.Thanda (v) (ST), Kurnool District by not following rules prescribed under selection guidelines issued by Department of Women and Child Welfare: Kurnool and consequently direct the Respondent 2 to 4 to appoint the petitioner as Anganwadi worker for the Y.G.Thanda (v) (ST), Kurnool District by setting aside the selection of Respondent No.5 by the Respondents 2 to 4, in the interest of justice
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition Under Rule 12 of W.P rules, 1977 r/w under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave for filing counter affidavit in the writ petition No. 1870/2016.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 2365 OF 2016)
''^ circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court mav be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to not to make the selection of S'" Resporident for the post of Anganwadi worker for the Y.G.Thanda (v) (ST) Kurnool District as permanent appointment
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR WOMEN DEV-CHILD WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI
Writ Petition No. 1870 of 2016
ORDER:
- No representation for the petitioner for the past two adjournments, particularly even today, though the matter was posted under the caption 'for dismissal'. As such,theWritPetition is dismissed for default.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall standclosed.
SD/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
Se^TKJN^FFICER
To,
csb
HIGH COURT
DATED:11/09/2023
ORDER
WP.No.1870 of 2016
^OF ANoTT^
oY
m
g 2 3 AUG 20?A
to,
. Current Section . *
Copfvi PBK
3i|lo)ii3
DISMISSING THE WP FOR DEFAULT
WITHOUT COSTS
S.Susheelamma W/o Venkata Naik
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The District Collector, The Chairman, The District Women & Child Development Agency, Kurnool
Project Director, The District Women & Child Development Agency, Kurnool
Child Development Project Officer, ICDS Project, Adoni Revenue Division, Pathikonda
Sugali Sujatha W/o Ramesh Naik
B S BHANUMATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
