Petitioners challenged a notification inviting applications for Fair Price Shop Dealers as violative of G.O.Ms.No.4/2011 and fundamental rights. The High Court held the petition infructuous as no further orders were required and dismissed it without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
/o’
FRIDAY. THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 16474 OF 2016
Between:
...PETITIONER{S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Notifications in R.C.No.C/16/2015, dated 02-05-2016 issued by the respondent No.2 inviting applications for appointment of Fair Price Shop Dealers of the Fair Price Shop Nos.1, 7, 9, 14 & 27 of Chakrayapeta Mandal, Y.S.R District as quite contrary to the G.O.Ms.No.4. Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies (CS-I) Department, dated 19-02-2011 and the Register of Roster prepared by the respondent No.2 and produced by him before this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.14711 of 2015 and Batch and also quite contrary to the well settled legal principles apart from tjeing violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Articles 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass
4
LA. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 20337 OF 20161
dated 02-05^2016 issuPri"hP*fh^^^"^® Notifications in R.C.No.C/16/2015 Writ PeWiSn respondent No.2. pending disposal of the above
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. V R REDDY KOVVURI
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
gHHT PETITION No. 16474 of 2016
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned Government Pleader.
During hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners on the instructions submitted that the matter has become infructuous and no further orders are required in this matter.
Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as i^W«'TKer^shaUbe no order as to costs.
. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ
Petition shall stand closed.
3
SD/-A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SEi OFFICER
To, SEi 2 Twn PP Kowuri Advocate [OPUC] 2. TwoI 00sCCs to GP for P utCivil Supplies, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies Sdkr
AL
HIGH COURT
DATED;05/05/2023
ORDER
WP.No.16474 of 2016
a 0 8 SEP 2023
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
3 provisions across 2 enactments
R.Sailaja, W/o.Siva Sankar
Mulla Ammazee, W/o. Mulla Mahamed Gouse
Kamatam Snehalatha, W/o. Pallet! Chinnodu
Gajula Gayathri, W/o.Gajula Mallikarjuna
N.Rajasekhar Reddy, S/o. N.Vengala Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh
D. Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
