High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by an Assistant Registrar challenging an internal transfer order, noting that the petition had become infructuous.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGHCOURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OFSEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MSJUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 1614 OF 2016
Between:
V.Srinivasa Rao, S/o V.Sambasiva Rao, agedabout 40 years, occ: Assistant Registrar, presently working at Jawaharlal NehruTechnologicalUniversity, Kakinada, E.G.District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the impunged order passed by the 1st respondent dt. 13-1-2016 bearing Procs. No. El/Internal Transfers/2015-16 transferring the petitioner in the place of 4th respondent who is working as Superintendent, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same, in so far as the petitioner herein is concerned.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 2037 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondents to continue the petitioner in the present place of work by suspending the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent dt.13.01.2016 bearing Procs. No.EI/Internal Transfers/2015-16, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI T ARUNACHALAM
Counsel for the Respondents: RAJASEKHAR RAO T(SC FOR JNTU KKDA)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI W.P.No.1614 of 2016
ORDER:
Sri V.Purnachandar Rao,learned counsel representing learned cousnel for the petitioner submitted that,the writ petition has become infructuous. As such, the writ petition is dismissedas infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shallstand closed. SDI- SHAIK MOHD. RAFT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 4l SEC h OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI T ARUNACHALAM Advocate [OPUC) 2. One CC to SRI RAJASEKHAR RAO T(SC FOR JNTU KKDA) Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies GSR
GSR
HIGH COURT
DATED:06/09/2023
ORDER
WP.No.1614 of 2016
DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS OF WP
5- Co ieA
Qb I~ ~ o 20
`
AN H
2 8 OCT 2323
y
* Current Section
V.Srinivasa Rao
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kakinada
The Vice Chancellor, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada
G.Joga Rao
K.B.Govinda Rao
Justice B S Bhanumathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
