Petition challenging official inaction to remove a statue was closed after respondents admitted via written instructions that the statue and platform had already been demolished, with the petitioner admitting the same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.1249 of 2023
ORDER:
The petitioners had approached this Court being aggrieved by the inaction of the official respondents in removing a statue which was sought to be set up near house of the petitioners.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
15.02.2023 RJS
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.1249 of 2023
15-02-2023
RJS
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
