Disposed
V Bharatha Lakshmi v. the State of Ap
Andhra Pradesh HCWP/11121/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Ernest While r ...RESPONDENTS Petition under…
What the court decided
AI extract
Ernest While r ...RESPONDENTS Petition under…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAvtb=a^ (Special Original jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUN TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
'■ ■ -PRESENT ■ ■■■
i.-
THE HON’BLE SRI Justice gannamaneni Ramakrishna prasad WRIT PETITION NO: 11121 OF 2023
Between:
V Bharatha Lakshmi, w/d-,-Rajubabu, Hiridu, Aged 31 years, R/o D.No.2-37, Tutipala
□Set Mandal, Anakapalli District Ernest While Visakhapatnam
...PETITIONER
and
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring that the order vide Re.No.35/2022/CS-6/ dt.15-9-2022 issued by Respondent no.4 as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and violative of Article 14 and 21 arid also offends various rights and protections guaranteed under the constitutions of India and quash the same i.e order vide RC.No.35/2022/CS-6/ dt. 15-92022 issued by Respondent no.4 and consequently declare that the NO OBJECTION Certificate, dt.23/02/2019 issued by Panchayat Secretary,
n
•/
/
Pradeab pe.roleuo,. produo.a (Ltoe^o^ilo^^ a’od'^Se^^":, rup'p^/oX^
lA NO: 1 OF 2n2a
^a^X4^%eXa^°
Reapoodeo, oo.4, peodiog diapoaal oHhe above w'rd pevS®
S:S°.U5.L’’Sh B^eii ''• "AO REP FOR SRI.
sSppUES ' ‘’® «•»«”»-"«• ’■*‘0 6: SRI G. RAJU. AGP FOR CIVIL
Counsel for the Respondents 2&3: GP FOR REVENUE
Rospondente 1 to 9: SR. N. SRIHARI. SC FOR GRAM
The Court made the following: ORDER
H-'- ■
. t
HOHBU sm a„ST,CB OANKAMAKBM
OF 2O2'» ORAL ORDRR; ■
1
Heard Sri .K., ^^^ Learned ' Counsel appearing on behalf of SH Sahhavarapu Satlsh Bahu Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri G. Raju,. . Earned Assistant Qovemm^t pleader for Civil Supplies ‘ appearing for Respondents.
I
«°‘-wara Rao; darned Co^^^^ ' behalf Of Sri Sahhav^apu Satish Bahu. Learned Counsel '
the WHt Petitio,er,,,hprits that the Interinr Order passed by this Court on 03.05.2022 has h„ has been complied with and that no further orders would be required.
has been complied •
Sn G. Raju, Learned As^stant Government Pleader for C.V.1 Supplies appearing for the Respondents has no objection for the same. 4. n this view of the matter, the present Writ Petition does not require any furtherconsideration in view of the compliance of the Interim Order dated 03.05.2022.
Shall be no order as to opst^; '
Contd.,
2
6. Interlocutory Applications; if any, stand closed in
terms of this order.
SD/- B. PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
/
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
4^*
HIGH COURT
DATED:14/O6/2O23
o|
I
ORDER
WP.No.11121 of 2023
DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
V Bharatha Lakshmi
The State of AP
Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court