Petitioner in a writ petition concerning land acquisition compensation sought to withdraw the petition. Permission was accorded, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI .
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY .THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 1041 OF 2019
Between:
Atmakuri Chenchemma. W/o Yellamanda, Aged about„L__, 75 years, /R/o. Mukthinuthalapadu Village, Ongole Mandal.Prakasam District.A.P ...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No 3 in awarding compensation of Rs. 1,00,69,933/- in the name of 5th respondent vide proceedings R.C.LA/NH5/ Ongole Bypass road/24/2010 dated 23.04,2012 and supplementary award proceedings No 40-A/2011 dated 23.04.2012 as illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of Art 300-A of the Constitution of India consequently set aside the proceedings Rc.LA/NH5/ Ongole Bypass road/24/2010 dated 23.04.2012 and supplementary award proceedings No 40-A/2011 dated 23.04.2012 and direct the respondent No. 3 to award compensation to the petitioner.
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the proceedings RC.LA/NH5/ Ongole Bypass road/24/2010 dated 23.04.2012 and supplementary award proceedings No 40-A/2011 dated 23.04.2012, issued by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the main WP.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. V. R. MACHAVARAM
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel for the Respondents 4&5: SRI. GHANTA SRIDHAR
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No. 1041 OF 2019
ORDER:
In ’pursuance of court slip dated 10.08.2023, learned
counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the
present writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions shall
stand closed.
NAGAMMA ASSISTANT registrar //TRUE COPY//
/
To.
Advocate [OPUC]
Sdkr
HIGH COURT
DATED:14/08/2023
ORDER
WP.No.1041 of 2019
OF or
0 5 SEP 2C73 TO
Cunenl Section
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
Atmakuri Chenchemma
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The District Collector Prakasam District
The Competent Authority and Special Deputy Collector (LA)
Pathapati Venkateswarlu
Pathapati Krishnaiah
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
