condition No.3(b) of general notification. Placing reliance on Zahoor 7. Nextly, he would argue condition In expatiation, he would submit that ag per the said condition a candidate out In the instant case, he would submit, the petitioner only worked as a Special Officer on contract service dated 07.11.2019 petitioner. Judge erroneously held as if the petitioner has experience for more than 3 Learned AG would strenuously argue that in the process, learned single Judge of Master/Principal and gave finding that the petitioner has fulfilled the that so far as No.3(b) is concerned, the petitioner has not fulfilled the said condition either. of 10 years of teaching experience must have 3 years of administrative experience as a Head Master/Principal of a High School or Junior College funded by the State/Central/Union Territory Government. in KGBV, Lepakshi, Ananthapur District not in the a Head Master or Principal. if her is into consideration, she cannot be said to have fulfilled condition No.3(b), for, the post of Special Officer cannot be equated with either a Head Master or a Principal. Therefore, the 2™ respondent has rightly rejected the candidature of the However, without considering these facts, the learned single has equated the post Special Officer with a Head basis capacity of either Therefore, even certificate taken years in terms of condition No.3(b) of general notification No.1/2019.
