The High Court set aside the impugned order due to inadequate consideration of natural justice and bylaw violations, remanding the matter to the Single Judge for a de novo hearing on merits.
Writ appeal allowed; impugned order dated 19.10.2022 set aside; matter remanded for de novo hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS
WRIT APPEAL No.197 of 2023
JUDGMENT:- (per Justice D.V.S.S.Somayajulu)
Heard Sri L.J.Veera Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2
followed for imposition of a punishment. He points out that in the impugned order there is no clear discussion about the exact Bylaw which was not been followed and it’s implication on the impugned order of punishment.
3
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
_______________________ JUSTICE V. SRINIVAS
17.03.2023 RKS
D.V.S.S. Somayajulu
V. Srinivas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
