The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 against an order in a Civil Miscellaneous Application as infructuous.
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There is no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
FRIDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 108 OF 2021
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, filed against the Order passed in CMA.No.2 of 2018, dated 24-01-2020 on the file of III Additional District Judge, Bhimavaram as well as the order dated 24-02-2018 made in IA.No.219 of 2017 in OS.No.133 of 2017, on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District
Between:
Md Yusuf Aslam, S/o Md.Yusuf, age about 56 years, Occ. Business, R/o D.No.2-12-17/1, Sivaraopeta, Old current office road, 0pp. Seshadri Towers, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District.
...Petitioner/Appellant/Defendant No.1
AND
(Respondents 2 and 3 are not necessary parties to this proceedings.)
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
...Respondents/Appellants 2 & 3/Defendants 2 &3
Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in pursuance to the injunction granted in I.A.No.219 of 2020 in O.S.No.133 of 2017 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram West Godavari District pending disposal of CRP.
Counsel for the Petitioners
: SRI K V L NARASIMHA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 108 of 2021 ORDER: -
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging theorder dated 24.01.2020 in C.M.A. No.2 of 2018 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Bhimavaram, in confirming the order dated 24.02.2018 in I.A. No.219 of 2017 in O.S. No.l33 of 2017 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram.
- Learned counsel Mr. P. Samuel Sanjay Kumar, representing Mr. K.V.L. Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
- Recording the above said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SD'iK kasirao ACHARI assistant registrar
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTION OFFICER
PSR sree
\
HIGH COURT DATED:15/12/2023
ORDER
CRP.No.108 of 2021
^ Copfe 2.6l2-l2Jf D6/_
DISMISSING THE C.R.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Md Yusuf Aslam
Sirisha Nukala
Kiranmayee Mandava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
