Dismissed

Shaik Suleman Pasha v. State of a.P., Rep by Pp.

Andhra Pradesh HC8 Nov 2023CRLRC/1583/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice V. Srinivas disposed of a criminal revision case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the CrPC. The court permitted the petitioner's withdrawal and dismissed the case as withdrawn, vacating interim orders and closing pending miscellaneous applications.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Case dismissed as withdrawn; interim orders vacated; miscellaneous applications closed.

Shaik Suleman Pasha Vs State of a.P… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Andhra Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

► '

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶3

WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. SRINIVAS

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1583 OF 2009

¶7

Between;

¶8

Shaik Suleman Pasha, S/o. China John Saheb, Aged 40 years, Reporter, Vartha Daily, Macherla.

¶9

...Respondent/Accused/Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

State of A.P., rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad

¶12

...Petitioner/Complainant/Respondent

¶13

Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case in this Hon'ble Court against the order in Crl.M.P.No.2260 of 2009 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Macherla.

¶14

I.A. NO; 1 OF 2009fCRLRCMP. NO: 2194 OF 2009)

¶15

• XU Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances^stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Pi'oceedings including appearance of the petitioner/accused in PRC No. 29/2006 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge -cum - Judicial First Class Magistrate, Macherla pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case

¶16

lA NO; 1 OF 2018

¶17

• XU under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances^stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to PRP oq including appearance of the petitioner in PRC.No.29 of 2006 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judi cial First Class Magistrate, Macherla, pending disposal of the Crl.Rc.No.1583 of 2009 pending before this Honourable High Court.

¶18

< ^

¶19

’}/./: (A'^NO: 1 OF 2019

¶20

¶21

«> Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated}

¶22

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petition in PRC No.29 of 2006 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge cum Judicial First Class Magistrate, Macherla pending disposal of the Crl.RC.No.1583 of 2009 pending before this Hon’ble High Court.

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS

¶27

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 1583 of 2009

¶28

ORDER;

¶29

This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner/accused against the order dated 25.08.2009 in Crl.M.P.No.2260 of 2009 in P.R.C.No.29 of 2008 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Macherla.

¶30

Both the learned counsel are present.

¶31

Today, when the matter is taken up for final hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case.

¶32

Permission is accorded.

¶33

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶34

Interim Orders granted earlier if any, stand vacated.

¶35

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any. shall stand closed.

¶36

SDI- E KAMESWARA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

I
O'

SECTION OFFICER

To, 1. The Junior Civil Judge - cum - Judicial First Class Magistrate, Macherla. 2. One CC to Sri Sreekanth Reddy Ambati, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi [OUT] 4. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court^{ofA.P.atAmaravathi.} 5. Three CD Copies SVR sree

HIGH COURT

DATED:08/11/2023

ORDER

CRLRC.No.1583 of 2009

¶45

DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS WITHDRAWN .v“l . V

Shaik Suleman Pasha v. State of a.P., Rep by Pp.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaik Suleman Pasha v. State of a.P., Rep by Pp.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunkara Satyanarayana, Vs the State of Ap Rep by Its Pp Hyd.

Matta Srinivasa Rao at Srinivas Vs the State of A.P.

Serasani Vijaya Babu Vs the State, Rep.Byits P.P

Shaik Khadar Vali Vs the State of A.P.

K.S.Yogeswar, Vs K.S.Sridevi, and Another

Govada Sekhar Vs the State of A.P.