High Court dismissed a Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for non-prosecution as petitioners failed to appear despite the matter being posted under dismissal caption.
Criminal Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^ —
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
FRIDAY. THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7090 OF 2018
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for Records in F.I.R.No.56 of 2017 dated 26-01-2017 on the file of Station House Officers, Pendurthi Police Station against Petitioners No.1 and 2 and quash the impugned FIR No.56 of 2017 dated 26-01-2017 and consequential bonds obtained by Respondent No.2 from the Petitioners No 1 and 2 not to enter into Ac. 16-94 cents of land and develop the same as per L.P.No.50/2013 dated 22-11-2013.
%
l-A. NO: 1 OF 2nifi
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C . . .... ^ ■ praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may w?th^ No.2 or any other police officer not to interfere th the civil rights of Petitioner No.3 and her employee Petitioner No 2 in vhiS°'^'2? bearing Sy.No. 7/4A3a and 7/4A3b of Narava /p M Visakhapatnam District as per approved layout in L.P.No.50/2013 dated 22-11-2013 pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K ARVIND KUMAR, Adyocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA
RAJASEKHAR RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION Nq.7090 OF 201«
ORDER:
There is no representation for the petitioner on 17.11.2023. Therefore, this Court directed to post this matter under dismissal caption for today i.e.,24.11.2023. Despite the matter being posted under dismissal caption, the petitioners have no representation.
Therefore, it evinces that the petitioners have no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, the present Criminal Petition is •• dismissed for r non-prosecution.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTION OFFICER
Amaravathi [OUT] High Court of Andhra Pradesh at
HIGH COURT
DATED;24/11/2023
ORDER
CRLP.No.7090 of 2018
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION •VM 0/
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vindula Venkata Ramana
Indala Eswara Rao
Vindula Leelavathi
The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Station House Officer, Pendurthi Police Station
Gompa Surya Prakasa Rao
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
