filed seeking to summon the Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Yemmiganur to produce account extract of the ledger of the accused and return memo dated 30.11.2016 in respect of cheque bearing No.000030, dated 12.11.2016 and in order to give evidence thereon. It is the case of 1 St respondent that the documents which the petitioner herein intends to rely upon were already part of the record. When such is the case, while dealing with applications to summon Branch Managers from different banks or officials or public functionaries, in general, the Courts must observe restraint, in view of the guidelines laid down in Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation represented by its Commissioner and another Vs M. Ramakrishna and others It is quite evident that when the petitioner intends to rely upon documents, which are made part of the record, there would not be any necessity to summon the head of the branch since the documents issued by the bank are presumed to be true. Except filing an application to summon the Branch Manager ofthe said bank, no reasons have been assigned as to how theevidenceof the proposed witness is necessary in the presentcase.The trial Court rightly placed relianceon Sections4 and5of the Banker's
