llvel,'hood by dolng sl'lk sarees bus,ness; that durl'ng the part of hI-S business on 23-12-2021 and on 24-12-2021 he supplied Silk sarees, on a credit basI'S, worth Rs.1,72,319/- and Rs|61,318/- respectl'vely, to the A'aya s,-Ik showroom, sl-tuated near saj Baba Temple,,{Benzl cl-rc'e, v,'jayawada; that Accused No.1 ls the owner of the sa,-d shop; that on demand, Accused No.1 I-ssued two cheques bearl'ng Mos.o40787 and o40788, on 12-02-2022 and-o8-02-2022 respect,®vely for an amount of Rs.1,72,318/-and Rs.61,545/- respect,-vely; that when the sa,-d cheques were presented for clearance, the same were dl-shonoured on the ground of ``Account closedJ'; that on o2-06-2023 at about 3.30 P.M, when the defacto complal'nant along wI'th h,'s frl'end by name Kotam Anand went to the Alaya s,-lk showroom and demanded Accused No.1 to pay the amount covered by the two cheques, as they suppll|ed the sl-lk sarees way back I-n the year 2021, Accused No.1 along w,-th hl's staff, who are shown as Accused Mos.2 to 5, beat the defacto complainant and hls frI'end l'ndI-SCr,'mlnately; that they also sal'd to have strl'pped of the clothes of the defacto complalnant and h,'s frI'end and made them to kneel down ,'n the show room titl±.30 p.m; that the accused also
