Arava Satyanarayana at Sathibabu v. the State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of interconnected Writ and Criminal petitions regarding land possession and seized paddy. The Court held that as tenancy rights are pending adjudication before a Special Officer, the sale proceeds of the harvested crop must be deposited with that Special Officer rather than the Revenue Treasury.
What did the court decide?
The sale proceeds of the harvested crop were directed to be deposited before the Special Officer for Tenancy Cases-cum-Additional Junior Civil Judge, Peddapuram, pending the outcome of pending Agri-Te