This is a criminal petition filed to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The bench observed that the charge sheet had been filed by the police. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
No relief granted; petition dismissed as infructuous due to filing of charge sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1901 OF 2020
Between:
...Petitioner/Accused 2 and 5
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that inthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime no. 518 of 2020, dated 05.05.2020 of on the file of the SHO PS Kanchikacharla, Krishna District, against the petitioner/Accused.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in Crime No.518 of 2020, dated 05.05.2020 on the file of the SHO PS Kanchikacharla,Krishna District till the disposal of the Main Quash petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K Viswanatham, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the RespondentNo.2.
The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRA^AI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1901 of 7070
ORDER:
Heard Sri K.Viswanatham, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. D.Prasanna Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the State/respondent No.1.
- When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that as per the written instructions received from the Station House Officer, Kanchikacherla Police Station, charge sheet has been filed in this case.
- Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of, recording the same.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- K SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
I I
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. The Station House Officer, Kanchikacharla Police Station, Krishna District 2. One CC to Sri. K Viswanatham, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradeshat Amaravati lOUT]
Pmg vna
*■
HIGH COURT
DATED:22/12/2023
ORDER
CRLP.No.1901 of 2020 9- CopfcS Zl-]zlzi+ D5U
:3
APi^
202^
“VI
’jS>,
'hyy
^CHEO
DISMISSING THE CRLP AS INFRUCTUOUS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C given the filing of the charge sheet.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Mohan Rao Chintala and Yelaka Pitchi Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh (through Public Prosecutor)
Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
