The High Court disposed of two criminal petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous because the respective appeals they sought to quash had already been disposed of by the Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa.
Both criminal petitions were disposed of as infructuous; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
»222»>
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI^^TJ^
TUESDAY JHE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
I
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
CRIMINAL PETITION NOS: 1316 AND 1320 OF 2020
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1316 OF 2020
Between:
N.MD. Mustek, S/o. Late N.Khadar Hussain, Occ: Teacher, Aged about 53 Years, R/o. D.No.8/209-1-15,40,Bismilla Nagar, Kadapa, YSR (Kadapa) District.
...Petitioner/Appellant/Accused
AND
...Respondents/Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the orders dated 19.12.2019 in Crl.M.P.No.2220 of 2019 in Crl.A.No.136 of 2019 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa, and allow the Criminal Petition.
\ ,
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the Petitioner in Crl.A.No.136 of 2019 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Shaik Mohammed Ismail, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and of Sri Allam Ramesh Advocate for the Respondent No.1
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1320 OF 2020
Between:
Sk M Abdul Raheem, S/o. Sk.M.Azeezulla Shareef, Aged about 52 Years, R/o. D.No.6/254, K.M.H Street, Kadapa, YSR (Kadapa)District.
...Petitioner/Appellant/Accused
AND
...Respondents/Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the orders dated 19.12.2019 in Crl.M.P.No.2219 of 2019 in Crl.A.No.135 of 2019 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa, and allow the criminal petition.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the Petitioner in Crl.A.No.135of2019onthefile of the Hon'ble Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Shaik Mohammed Ismail, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and of Sri Allam Ramesh advocatefor the Respondent No.1
The Court made the following Common Order:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1316 AND 1320 OF 2020
COMMON ORDER:
Sri Durga Shiva Sai, learned counsel representing Sri Shaik Mohammed Ismail, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sravan Kumar Naidana, learned Special Assistant PublicProsecutor representing respondent No. 1/State, are present.
- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the appeals were disposed of by the learned Principal Sessions Judge at Kadapa.
- In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petitions become infructuous, and they deserved to be disposed of asinfructuous.
- Accordingly, both the Criminal Petitions are ‘Disposed of as Infructuous’.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stands closed.
SD/- S SRINIVASA PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR f'^ECTION^FICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SMA
sree
HIGH COURT
DATED: 19/09/2023
COMMON ORDER
E?
j/X 10 SEP 20?A •y0\i
CRLP Nos.1316 and 1320 of 2020 ^ ^ Currant Section
*!>,j^SPaTCVA?3
DISPOSING BOTH THE CRLPs AS INFRUCTUOUS
N.MD. Mustek
Mada Subbarayudu
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor
Sk M Abdul Raheem
Mada Subbarayudu
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor
B.V.L.N. Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
