Dismissed

Ayitha Rajesh v. N Srinivasulu

Andhra Pradesh HC3 Feb 2023CC/6248/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court closed a contempt petition filed against a Tahsildar for alleged non-implementation of a writ order. Noting the reply affidavit confirmed the application was considered and rejected, the court held that the contempt case was closed but allowed parties to challenge the rejection order separately.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed. Petitioners at liberty to challenge the endorsement dated 29.12.2022 advised.

Ayitha Rajesh Vs N Srinivasulu — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶2

. FRIDAY .THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

¶5

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6248 OF 2022

¶6

[fg

¶7

Contempt case U/s. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to Punish the

¶8

Between:

¶9

1.1. AyithMyiin a Rajnaj es nh , 5>/oS/o Ma nh eswara, Aged about 3 4.4 years, Occ Cultivation R/o Narayanapuram Village', Damavaram Post, Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.

¶10

Maruboyina Suresh, S/o Gopalaiah, Aged about 34 years, Occ Cultivation 5 H Narayanapuram Village, Damavaram Post, Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. Sreedevi, VV/o Srinivasulu, Aged about 41 years, Occ Cultivation

¶11

UnR/o Narayanapuram Village, Damavaram Post ,. Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. .

¶12

...Petitioners

¶13

AND

¶14

N Srinivasulu. Tahsildar. Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.

¶15

P. Siva. Mandal Surveyor. Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. '

¶16

...Respondents

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRi. MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI NARASIMHA REDDY. G . L

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

L H'

ei i! r

i ■

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATHI

¶28

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

¶29

CONTEMPT CASE No.6248 OF 2022

¶30

Between:

¶31

Ayitha Rajesh and three others

¶32

... Petitioners

¶33

and

¶34

N.Srinivasulu, Tahsildar, Dagadarthi Mandal,SPSR Nellore District and another

¶35

... Respondents

¶36

Counsel for the petitioners : Mr.Muchakayala Narayana

¶37

Counsel for R.l & R.2 : Mr.Narasimha Reddy G.L.

¶38

ORDER:

¶39

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶40

learned Assistsint Government Pleader for Revenue representing Mr.Narasimha Reddy G.L., appearing for the respondents.

¶41

The Contempt Case is filed alleging non implementation of the orders dated 21.10.2022 in Writ Petition No.34560 of 2022 ‘The said writ petition was disposed of, with a direction to the pt respondentTahsildar, to take appropriate action on the petitioners’

¶42

¶43

application dated 20.9.2022 and intimate the decision to the petitioners within a period of four weeks from the

¶44

date of receipt of a copy of the order.

¶45

A reply affidavit is filed by the I®* respondent

¶46

wherein it is inter alia stated that pursuant to the above

¶47

said orders, the application of the petitioners was considered and endorsement dated 29.12.2022 was

¶48

issued rejecting the request of the petitioners.

¶49

In view of the same, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to challenge the

¶50

sai4 endorsement dated 29.12.2022, if they are so

¶51

advised. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶52

Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if

¶53

any, shall stand closed. ’4-

¶54

SD/-M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY R^ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTIONOFFICER

¶55

To,

¶56

N.Srinivasulu, Tahsildar, Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 2. P. Siva, Mandal Surveyor. Dagadarthi Mandal. SPSR Nellore District. 3. One CC to Sri Muchakayala Narayana. Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri Narasimha Reddy. G . L. Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies

sree

HIGH COURT

DATED: 03/02/2023

¶61

ORDER

¶62

'3;
I® 1 4 AUG 2023 mi

¶63

CC.No.6248 of 2022

¶64

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE

Ayitha Rajesh v. N Srinivasulu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayitha Rajesh v. N Srinivasulu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Giddaluru Veera Swamy Vs Pattaneshetti Ravi Subhash,I.a.S

M/S. Raghuram Hume Pipes Private Limited Vs Sashibhushan Kumar,I.a.S

Nagaraju Subbaraju Vs Sri Shamsher Singh Rawat

Salagala Kiran Kumar Vs State of Ap

Graddagunta Madhavaiah Vs N Srinivasulu

Harikasree Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh