B.Madhu Babu v. G K. Dwivedi,I.a.S
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petitioner sought closure after respondents claimed compliance with prior orders. Court accepted compliance and closed the case.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed. No costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions in the contempt case stood closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE No. 4554 of 2022
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 04.08.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.22297, 22305, 22312, 22321 of 2022.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 04.08.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.22297, 22305, 22312, 22321 of 2022 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
In view of the above, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
____________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
5th January, 2023 MSI
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondents
Coram
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/4554/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court