A writ petition was disposed of, relying on a prior judgment (W.P.No.8384 of 2020) holding such pleas non-maintainable. The court left remedies open to the petitioner under law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
W.P.No.880 of 2022
ORDER:
The petitioner has approached this Court with the complaint that the complaint filed by the petitioner before the 1st respondent has not been registered and the contention of the 1st respondent that the said complaint was not received by him at all, is incorrect.
of 2020 held that a writ petition seeking such a direction is not maintainable.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand
closed.
_________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
17th November, 2022 Js.
Issue C.C. by Monday.
RRR,J 2 W.P.No.880 of 2022
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
W.P.No.880 of 2022
17th November, 2022
Js.
The Petitioner
The 1st Respondent
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
