The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on the ground that the petitioner's counsel had so submitted.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous applications dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
Writ Petition No.6123 of 2021
ORDER:-
Mr.Siva Nagarjuna, learned counsel representing
Mr.T.V.S.Prabakara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any,
shall stand dismissed.
_______________________ Dr. K. MANMADHA RAO, J
Date: 19.07.2022
HS
2
THE HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
Writ Petition No.6123 of 2021
Date: 19.07.2022
HS
Mr.T.V.S.Prabakara Rao
K. Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
