The Court dismissed a writ petition on April 5, 2022, for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner's representation on the date of hearing and the day of disposal.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.6009 OF 2015
ORDER :
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 30.04.2022. Hence, it is posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 04.05.2022 SSP
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.6009 OF 2015
Date: 04.05.2022
SSP
Petitioner
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
