Disposed

Kasthuri Manayam, Chittoor Dist. v. the State of a.P.,Revenue,Hyd.,and 4 Otrs.

Andhra Pradesh HC3 Nov 2022WP/5427/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition under Article 226 challenged the inaction on specific complaints. With the respondents' consent, the court disposed of the petition by directing the authorities to decide the pending complaints within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent authorities to pass orders on pending complaints within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order.

Kasthuri Manayam, Chittoor Dist. Vs the… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2022)

¶1

HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.5427 of 2015

¶3

ORDER :

¶4

The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

¶5

“to issue any writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declare the action of the respondents in not taking action on the complaint given by the petitioner on 07.01.2013 and 11.02.2013 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents to take appropriate action on the complaint given by the petitioner on 11.02.2013 in accordance with law and to pass such other orders”.

¶6

Heard learned Government Pleader for Revenue

¶7

appearing for respondents 1 to 3.

¶8

No representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶9

Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, the truth or otherwise in those allegations need not be adjudicated by this Court as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents 1 to 3 readily agreed for disposal of the complaint given by the

¶10

¶11

petitioner on 07.01.2013 and 11.02.2013, if any, pending with the respondent authorities.

¶12

Therefore, instead of going into the merits of the case, having considered the submission of learned Government Pleader for Revenue, the Writ Petition is disposed of , directing the respondent authorities to pass orders on the complaint given by the petitioner on 07.01.2013 and 11.02.2013, if any, pending with them, in accordance with law, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There is no order as to costs.

¶13

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if

¶14

any, shall also stand closed.

¶15

_______________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶16

Date : 03.11.2022 ARR

¶17

¶18

HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶19

WRIT PETITION No.5427 of 2015

¶20

Date : 03.11.2022

¶21

ARR

Kasthuri Manayam, Chittoor Dist. v. the State of a.P.,Revenue,Hyd.,and 4 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kasthuri Manayam, Chittoor Dist. v. the State of a.P.,Revenue,Hyd.,and 4 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Viswanadhapalli Nallaiah Vs the State of Ap

A.Kamalamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Prl. Secretary

Devineni Gopi, Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the R.D.O

K.Kesavaraju, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Macherla Chennamma, Vs The State of A.P. Rep. by its Pri. Secretary

Murari Venkateswara Rao Vs The 5tate of Andhra Pradesh