Allowed

Vaddeboina Venkata Krishna Reddy at Nellore Kirshna Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC1 Aug 2022WP/317/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Batch of writ petitions challenging the opening and continuation of rowdy sheets, suspect sheets and history sheets by the police under Chapter-37 of the A.P. Police Standing Orders. Following this Court's earlier common order declaring that Chapter void, the Court allowed the petitions, declared the sheets illegal and unconstitutional and directed their closure.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions allowed; the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets opened against the petitioners declared illegal and unconstitutional and directed to be closed forthwith, with no surveillance or

Vaddeboina Venkata Krishna Reddy… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Andhra Pradesh HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHKWn MANAVENDRANATH ROY

¶5

^26 and ^1442, 18696, 23516,

¶6

WRIT PETITION No; 4990 OF 201fi

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt. A.Meena, W/o, Venkateswararao, aged about 34 years, D. No. 29-74/1, Vadderapalem, Chilakaluripet Town, Guntur District

¶9

AND

¶10

...Petitioner

¶11

Pote Guntur District Rep, by its

¶12

?' Thf Guntur District, Guntur. ?Jde®?bad •' Home Department, Secretariat,

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

vMaaveXrinc^tes of na to iaw and the suspectSi sbe^et^fndtr^fore the r^pS''

¶15

LA. NO; 1 OF 2QlfifWPMP. NO: 6375 OF

¶16

in the affida\drfil^ in^UDDort of thJ playing that in the^{circumstancesstated} rtSSaS [K:

¶17

SunS for Se THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶18

WRIT PETITION NQ; I4fij i pp 20j fi

Between:

AND

...Petitioners

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶24

The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, West Godavari^District.

¶25

The Station House Officer, Palakol Town, Palakol,^{WestGodavariDistrict.}

¶26

...Respondents

¶27

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly^{oneinthenatureofWritofMandamus} declaring the action of the respondents Not and 3 in continuing the rowdy sheet against the petitioner by the 3"'^ respondent is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and violative of principles nf natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet pending before the 3^^ respondent.

¶28

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016rWPMP. NO: 18189 OF 2016^

¶29

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet pending before the 3’’'^ respondent against the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMA MOHAN PALANKI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶30

WRIT PETITION NO: 18284 OF 2016

¶31

Between:

¶32

S.N. Madhu, S/o Late S. Nagaraju Aged about: 34 Yrs, Manager, Syndicate Bank, Singanamala Branch R/o D.No.l7/825D, Tilak Nagar, Guntakal, Anantapur District

¶33

S.N.Ramesh, S/o Late S. Nagaraju Aged about: 38 Yrs, Occ: Advocate R/o D.No. 17/8250, Tilak Nagar, Guntakal, Anantapur District

¶34

S.N. Padmavathi, W/o Late S. Nagaraju Aged about: 58 Yrs, Occ: Housewife R/o D.N0.17/825D, Tilak Nagar, Guntakal, Anantapur District

¶35

...Petitioners

¶36

AND

¶37

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶38

The Superintendent of Police, Anantapur, Anantapur^District.

¶39

The Station House Officer, Guntakal II Town Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District.

¶40

The Sub Inspector of Police, Guntakal II Town Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District

¶41

Vali Basha, S/o not known to petitioner The Sub Inspector of Police (SI-2823), Guntakal II Town Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur^District.

¶42

...Respondents

¶43

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly^one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent police in harassing the petitioners requiring him to attend the police station every day without there being any reason and without any connected crime and to settle the civil disputes in between the family members of the petitioners and further proclaiming to open rowdy sheet against petitioner 1 and 2 without there being any cause and without following the Police Standing Orders is amounts to abuse of process, illegal, arbitrary and^{inviolationofArticle14,19and21of}

¶44

¶45

Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioners by opening of rowdy sheet.

¶46

LA. NO; 1 OF 2016rWPMP. NO: 22459 OF 20163

¶47

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners by opening rowdy sheet by calling them to sit in police station hours together, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶48

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NARAHARI BABU

¶49

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶50

WRIT PETITION NO: 28889 OF 201fi

¶51

Between:

¶52

Sri. Atmakuru Babu Rao, S/o Late Masthanaiah, Aged about 43 years, Occ: Private Employee, Vaweru Village, Buchireddipalem Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. Present R/o D.No.12/1/101, 0pp. Sivalayam, Guptha Park Centre, Santhapet, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. ...Petitioner

¶53

AND

¶54

The State of A.P., rep.by its PrI Secretary, Department of Home,Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶55

The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Nellore Rural,^{SPSRNelloreDistrict.} 4. The Station House Officer, Buchireddipalem Mandal,^{SPSRNelloreDistrict}

¶56

¶57

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 35768 OF 20161

¶58

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned notice vide Rc.D5 (S.R.)412011, dated 10.10.2014 and Another Notice 01.09.2015 said to have been issued under Revenue Recovery Act, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.

¶59

lA NO: 1 OF 2017

¶60

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents authorities to close the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner in W.P.No.28889 of 2016.

¶61

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR

¶62

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶63

¶64

WRIT PETITION NO: 3182 OF 2018

¶65

Between:

¶66

Soru Sambaiah, S/o. late. Appalaswamy Aged about 57 years, Occ Social Worker and Chief of Ambedkar Porata Samit, R/o.Sangam Street, Bobbili, Vizianagaram District.

¶67

...Petitioner

¶68

AND

¶69

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its. Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravathi. Guntur.

¶70

The Director General of Police, DGP, State of Andhra^Pradesh.

¶71

The Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram District.

¶72

The Station House Officer, Bobbili Police Station, Vizianagaram District.

¶73

...Respondents

¶74

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue order or orders more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents herein closing the rowdy sheet against the petitioner herein without reviewing the same and subject to physical and mental torture is illegal, arbitrary, discriminory violation of principles of natural justice and violation of rule of law and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially it is also prayed that this Honble court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 and 4 herein to close the Rowdy sheet against the petitioner herein.

¶75

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶76

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner herein register in the Respondent No.4 herein station and not to harass the petitioner without due process^oflaw.

¶77

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMESH BABU PEDAPALLI

¶78

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶79

WRIT PETITION NO: 4204 OF 2019

¶80

Between:

¶81

G H Reddy, living by cultivation. Residing YSR Kadapa District, A.P.

¶82

in Gorigenur Village, Jammalamadugu Mandal,

¶83

...Petitioner

¶84

AND

¶85

The State of AP, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.

¶86

The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District, Kadapa 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Jammalamadugu Division, Jammalamadugu, YSR Kadapa District

¶87

The Sub Inspector of Police, Jammalamadugu Urban Police Station, Jammalarrtdduyu Town, YSR Kadapa District.

¶88

...Respondents

¶89

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the proceedings vide memo C. No. 02/ SDPO-JMD/2018 passed by the 3"^ Respondent herein dated 11.02.2018 directing the 4‘^ Respondent to open rowdy sheet against the Petitioner is arbitrary, illegal, malafide and violation of Article^{21oftheConstitutionofIndiaand}

¶90

¶91

consequently direct the Respondents herein to close the rowdy sheet, opened against the Petitioner and further direct not to interfere with the personal liberty of the Petitioner.

¶92

lA NO: 1 OF 301 q

¶93

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent herein not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station and insist the Petitioner to furnish photographs belonging to the Petitioner in pursuance of the Memo vide C No 02/ SDPO-JMD/2018.

¶94

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K MUNI REDDY BALA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶95

WRIT PETITION NO: 10545 OF 2010

¶96

Between:

¶97

Mulageri Chinna Lakshamanna Karem Lakshmanna, S/o. Late Chinna Thirumalaiah, aged 32 years, R/o. H.No.3/143, Chinnapendekal Village, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶98

...Petitioner

¶99

AND

¶100

The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶101

The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District, Andhra^Pradesh. 3. Tf^ Deputy Superintendent of Police, Adoni, Kunrool^{District,AndhraPradesh.} 4. The SHO, Adoni Taluka Police Station, Kurnool District, Andhra^Pradesh.

¶102

...Respondents

¶103

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the 4th respondent police station as arbitrary illegal and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the police standing orders and consequently set aside the rowdy sheet continued against the petitioner in the 4th respondent police station. lA NO: 1 OF 201Q Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4‘'’ respondent not to call petitioner to the police station without there being pendency of any crime till disposal of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶104

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶105

WRIT PETITION NO: 11948 OF 2019

¶106

Between:

¶107

Bathula Siva Prasad, S/o. Bhadrachalam, Hindu, Aged 27 vears. Door No. 8-29-64,. Ganesh Nagar, Agatha Varappadu Village, Peda Kakani Mandal,^GunturDist.

¶108

...Petitioner

¶109

¶110

1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Prt. Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶111

¶112

The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Superintendent of Police, SPSR Neilore District,^Nellore. 4. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nellore Town Sub-Division, Nellore

¶113

The SLdLiuii House Officer, IV Town Police Station,^Nellore.

¶114

...Respondents

¶115

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction, more in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing Suspect Sheet No.8 of 2015 against the petitioner in Peda Kakani Police Station of Guntur District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also ultra virus the Police Standing Orders and consequently direct the respondents to close the Suspect Sheet No.8 dated 21.08.2015.

¶116

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶117

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner representation^dated 14.08.2019 for closure of Suspect Sheet No.8 dated 21.8.2015 on the file of PedaKakani Police Station, Pedakakani of Guntur District.

¶118

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶119

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to correct the words as Rowdy Sheet in place of Suspect Sheet by amending the letters in the W.P.No.11948/2019.

¶120

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶121

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the affidavit in the present Writ Petition on file.

¶122

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH MARKONDAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶123

WRIT PETITION NO: 12035 OF 2019

¶124

Between:

¶125

Challa Mariya Dasu, S/o Veera Swamy, Hindu, aged about 33 years, R/o Door No.8-2964/93, Ganesh Nagar, Agatha Varappadu Village, Peda Kakani Mandal, Guntur District.

¶126

...Petitioner AND

¶127

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶128

The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh State.

¶129

The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban District,^Guntur.

¶130

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Guntur Urban District, Guntur. 5. The Station House Officer, Peda Kakani Police Station, Peda Kakni, Guntur District.

¶131

¶132

¶133

2015 vide proceedings of the 4^'’ respondent in C.No.l29/SDPO^{NORTHDIV.I-GUNTUR} UR8AN/2015 against the petitioner in Peda Kakani Police Station, Guntur as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also ultra virus the Police Standing Orders and consequently direct the respondents to close the Suspect Sheet No.7/2015 dated 21.08.2015.

¶134

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶135

Petition under Section 151 OPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner representation^dated 14.08.2019 for closure of suspect sheet No.7/15 dated 21.08.2015 vide Proceedings in C.No.l29/SDPO NORTH DIV.I-GUNTUR URBAN/2015 issued by the 4**^ respondent pending on the file of the Peda Kakani Police Station, Guntur, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶136

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶137

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed, in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to correct the words as 'Rowdy Sheet' in place of 'Suspect Sheet' by amending the letters in the WP.No.12035/2019.

¶138

lA NO; 1 OF 2022

¶139

¶140

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH MARKONDAIAH

¶141

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶142

WRIT PETITION NO: 17227 OF 2019

¶143

Between:

¶144

Kampasati Satyanarayana, S/o. Nageswararao, Aged about 54 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Chintalapudi V and,M, West Godavari District.

¶145

...Petitioner

¶146

AND

¶147

The state of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary Home

¶148

Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶149

The Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District,^AtEturu. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jangareddygudem^{DivisionWestGodavari} District.

¶150

The Station House Officer, Chintalapudi West Godavari^District.

¶151

...Respondents

¶152

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus by declaring that the action of the respondents opening rowdy sheet against the petitioner and continuing the same is illegal arbitrary, and unconstitution al and consequently direct the respondents to lift the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the interest of Justice.

¶153

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶154

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the lespondents nut Lu call fut Lu police station and bifid over during pendency of above Writ petition in the interest of Justice.

¶155

¶156

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M P V N V SASTRI

¶157

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶158

WRIT PETITION NO: 19568 OF 2019

¶159

Between:

¶160

Doopana Sup/anarayana Reddy, S/o Neeladri Reddy, aged about 35 years, R/o Birlangi Village in Ichapuram Mandal, Srikakulam District. ...Petitioner

¶161

AND

¶162

The state of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary for Home, Secretariat, Velaqapudi, Guntur District. 2. Superintendant of Police, Srikakulam. 3. Subdivisional Police officer, Kasibugga, Srikakulam^District. 4. Inspector of police, Ichapuram, Srikakulam District. 5. SI of police Ichapuram Rural PS, Srikakulam District.

¶163

...Respondents

¶164

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus and declaring the acts of respondents in opening Rowdy sheet No.96/2019 against the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and against provisions of Police Standing orders and violative of Art. 21 of Constitution of India and set aside the rowdy sheet opened against petitioner and consequently direct the respondents to close rowdy sheet opened against petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ^Petition.

¶165

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATESWARLU KOLLA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶166

WRIT PETITION NO: 19756 OF 2Q1Q

¶167

Between:

¶168

U Venkateswarlu, S/o Giddaiah, Aged about 36 years, resident of H.No. 4-96, Remata village, Kurnool Mandal, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶169

Petitioner

¶170

AND

¶171

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its.Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶172

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Guduru Police Station, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances^stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2"“ respondent not to call me to the police station pending disposal of aforesaid writ petition.

¶177

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GHANTA SRIDHAR

¶178

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶179

WRIT PETITION NO: 20775 OF 2019 Between:

¶180

U.Durga Rao, S/o. Anjaneyulu, aged about 28 years, R/o. H.No. 8-11, Ambedkar Colony, R/o. B.Ndamanuru village, Nagutuppalapadu Mandal, Prakasam^District.

¶181

...Petitioner

¶182

AND

¶183

The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by It s Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati^{GunturDistrict.}

¶184

The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole 3. The Station House Officer, Naguluppalapadu Police Station, Naguluppalapadu, Prakasam Dist

¶185

...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet No. 432/18 against him even after acquittal in the solitary crime registered against him by the learned Special Judge for Trial of Offences under Electricity Act Cases-cum- I Addl. Sessions Judge, Prakasam District at Ongole by a Judgment dated 1.7.2019 in POCSOA S.C.No. 35/2017 and making him to sit there for hours together offering threats to him on pretext of counselling time and again, requiring his bind over as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the letter and spirit of catena of Judgments rendered by Honorable Supreme Court on Human Dignity and protection of Human Rights apart from being^{violativeofArticles20and21of} the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet against the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances^stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner without there being any crime registered against him on the pretext of continuance of rowdy sheet, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶186

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.CHALAPATHI

¶187

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶188

WRIT PETITION NO: Sfifl OF 2020

¶189

Between:

¶190

Gorle Sekhar, S/o, Nookaraju Aged about 36 years, Occ. business, R/o D.No.7-6-10, Velupula Street, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, (Home Department), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amravati city, Guntur.

¶191

¶192

The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam district, Visakhapatnam 3. The Dy. SP/ Sub Divisional Police Officer (SDPO), Anakapalalli Sub-Division Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam

¶193

The Station House officer, Anakapalli Town PS, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam Dist.

¶194

Sri. S. Tata Rao, Inspector of police. Worked as SHO in Anakapalli Town PS, (In the elections period year 2019) Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam^Dist

¶195

Vasadi Syamalarao, S/o Satya Rao Aged about 30 years, R/o. D.No.8-4-9, Kotniveedhi, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam^District.

¶196

...Respondents

¶197

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue, writ, direction or order, more particularly^{oneinthenatureofwritofCertioraricall} for the record pertaining to Rowdy Sheet Proceedings vide.C.No.20/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPOAKP/2019 dated 20-05-2019 on the file of the respondent No.3 and quashed the same by declaring the sane as illegal arbitrary, unwarranted, and violation of Art 14, 20 and 21 of Constitution of India and in Violation of PSO 601. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the certified copy of the Rowdy Sheet Proceedings vide.C.No.20/RowdySheet/SDPO-AKP/2019 dated 20-05-2019. lA NO; 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 not to extension further the Rowdy Sheet of the Proceedings C.No.20/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AKP/2019 dated 20-05-2019 issued by respondent No.3 pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶198

lA NO; 3 OF 2020

¶199

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the all the proceedings in C.No.20/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AKP/2019 dated 20-05-2019 issued by respondent No.3 pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶200

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BATHULA RAJ KIRAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶201

WRIT PETITION NO: 620 OF 2020

¶202

Between:

¶203

Amarpalli Krishnaji, S/o late Ramadu Aged about 53 years, Occ: business, R/o D.No.6-5-9, Velupula Street, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District.

¶204

...Petitioner

¶205

AND

¶206

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, (Home Department), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amravati city, Guntur.

¶207

The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam.

¶208

The Dy. SP/ Sub Divisional Police Officer, (SDPO) Anakapalalli Sub-Division Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District.

¶209

¶210

The Station House Officer, AriakapaJfi Town PS, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam Distrist. 5. Sri. S. Tata Rao, Inspector of police. Worked as SHO in Anakapalli Town PS, (In the elections period year 2019) Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam^District.

¶211

Vasadi Syamalarao, S/o Satya Rao Aged about 30 years, R/o. D.No.8-4-9, Kotniveedhi, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam^District.

¶212

...Respondents

¶213

¶214

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the certified copy of the Rowdy Sheet Proceedings vide.C.No.l9/RowdySheet/SDPO-AKID/2019 dated 20-05-2019.

¶215

lA NO; 2 OF 2020

¶216

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedinthe} affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the all the proceedings in C.No.l9/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AKP/2019 dated 20-05-2019 issued by respondent No,3 pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BATHULA RAJ KIRAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶217

WRIT PETITION NO: 22541 OF 2020

¶218

Between:

¶219

Vishwanadham Subba Ramakrishna @ Chinna, S/o. Jagadeeswara Rao, Aged about 33 years, Occ. Business, R/o. 6-9, Near Pedda Ramalayam, Thatiparthi Village, GoHaprolu Mandal, East.Godavari District, A.P.

¶220

Vishwanadham Purushottam, S/o.Jagadeeswara Rao, Aged about 31 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. 6-9, Near Pedda Ramalayam, Thatiparthi Village, GoHaprolu Mandal, East Godavari District, A.P

¶221

Adapa Prakash Rao @ Prakashayya, S/o. Sesha Rao, Aged about . 48 years, Occ.Agriculture R/o. Chakalipeta, Thatiparthi Village, GoHaprolu Mandal, East Godavari District, A.P. ...Petitioners

¶222

AND

¶223

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District,

¶224

The Superintendent of Police, East Godavarai District, At Kakikanda, A.P. 3. The Station House Officer, GoHaprolu, East Godavari District, A.P.

¶225

...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of WRIT OF MAND.AMUS to deda.nng that the continuation of Rowdy-sheet No.263 in respect of petitioner No.l, i.e., Vishwanadham Subba Ramakrishna, Rowdy-sheet No.262 in respect of Petitioner No.2, i.e.,Vishwanadham Purushottam and Rowdy-sheet No.261 in respect of petitioner No.3, i.e., Sri.Adapa Prakash Rao in spite of acquittal in SC No.371/201 on the file of XI Additional Ses.sions liidge, Pithapiiram hy judgment dated

¶226

¶227

24-01-2Q18 and registering binding over cases on the ground of Rowdy sheets in favour of the petitioners as illegal, untenable, unsustainable, motivated, against the law, and violative of the life and liberty as guaranteed under the Indian Constitution and principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheets as against the petitioners and not to harass the petitioners in any manner.

¶228

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶229

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to call the petitioners to the Police Station under the guise of Rowdysheet No.263, 262 and 261 in the name of petitioners.

¶230

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶231

WRIT PETITION NO: 24449 OF 2020

¶232

Between:

¶233

Parabathula Yesu Babu, S/o Late Krishna Murthy, Aged about 44 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o D.No. 2-42, Thondavaram Village, Ambajipeta Mandal, East Godavari District.

¶234

...Petitioner

¶235

¶236

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.

¶237

The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Manqalaqiri, Amaravathi.

¶238

The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, East Godavari^District.

¶239

The Sub Divisional Police Station Officer, Amalpuram Sub Division, East Godavri District.

¶240

The Station House Officer, Ambajipeta Police Station, East Godavari District.

¶241

...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the actiorr on the part of the respondents herein opened and continuing the rowdy sheet vide H.S No. 150 dated 10.01.2015 (not served copy by the police) by 5th respondent police station contrary to the order No. 601 (A) of the A.P. Police Manual basing on the registration of crimes in property disputes between the family members on other than the petitioner and his sister( due to protecting the mother aged about 85 years by the petitioner as per registered will executed by his father dated 30.08.2000) as illegal arbitrary and violating the articles 14,19 and 21 of the constitution of India and set aside the same and consequentially direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner to calling the police station every day on false crimes basing on the continuing the rowdy sheet vide H.S No. 150 dated. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner to calling the police station every day on false crimes basing on the continuing the rowdy sheet vide H.S No. 150 dated 10.01.2015 pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶242

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BOKKA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶243

¶244

WRIT PETITION NO: 25428 OF 2020

¶245

Between;

¶246

Linganeni Venkata Krishna, S/o, Nageswara Rao, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Bandarupalii Village, Tadikonda Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner

¶247

AND

¶248

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶249

Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Guntur. 3. Divisional Superintendent of Police, Guntur North,^{GunturDistrict.} 4. Station House Officer, Tadikonda Police Station, Tadikonda, Guntur District.

¶250

...Respondents

¶251

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly^{oneinthenatureofWritofMandamus'} declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 herein in not closing the History Sheet (Rowdy Sheet) opened against the petitioner inspite of the acquittal of the petitioner in SC.No. 182 of 2011 on the file of the Court of Sessions Judge, Guntur, and without taking into consideration of the Orders passed by this Hon'ble^Court in WP.No.38170 of 2012 dated 14-03-2016, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to close the History Sheet (Rowdy Sheet) opened against the petitioner by the 4th respondent forthwith.

¶252

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶253

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to pay domiciliary visits to petitioner house nor insist upon petitioner appearance before them, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶254

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶255

WRIT PETITION NO: 317 OF 2021

¶256

Between:

¶257

Vaddeboina Venkata Krishna Reddy @ Nellore Kirshna Reddy, S/o. Panchatntram Reddy, Aged about 52 years, Vempalli Road, Yerraguntia Town, Kadapa District.

¶258

...Petitioner

¶259

AND

¶260

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶261

The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa District, Kadapa. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa^District. 4. The Station House Officer, Yerraguntia Police Station, Kadapa District.

¶262

...Respondents

¶263

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue Writ, direction or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the Orders in R.C.No.27/R.S./SDPO-KDP/14, dt.25-9-2014 Issued by the Respondent No. 3 and there by open rowdy sheet No351 against the petitioner is Illegal, arbitrary, violation of the Principles of Natural Justice, Violation PSO 601 and In

¶264

¶265

violation of Art. 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequences set aside the Rowdy sheet no-351 maintaining by Respondent No. 3.

¶266

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶267

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to their police station by suspending the Operation of Rowdy sheet no-351 maintaining by Respondent No. 3 pending disposal above Writ Petition.

¶268

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶269

WRIT PETITION NO: 787 OF 2021

¶270

Between:

¶271

Chennu Chanti, S/o.Sri Ch.Perayya Hindu, aged 46 years Occ-Business, R/o.Door No.3-5-4 Chekkavari Street, Bhimavaram West Godavari District Andhra Pradesh

¶272

■ ■ ■ Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department A.P.Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District,^{AndhraPradesh.} 2. The Superintendent of Police, W.G.District, Eluru,^AP. 3. The Sub. Divisional Police Officer, Narsapur, Sub.Division, Narsapur, W.G.District, AP. 4. The Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Bhimavaram, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Bhimavaram, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶273

...Respondents

¶274

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to -issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the action of the 3'''* Respondent in permitting the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to open the rowdy sheet against the petitioner and opening of rowdy sheet vide Sheet No.3/ 2020 on the file of the 5“" Respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary exercise of power, contrary to Police Standing Orders and also violative of Art. 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 to remove the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner forthwith on the file of the Respondent.

¶275

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶276

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 not to interfere with petitioner's life and liberty under the guise of opening of a rowdy sheet against him on the file of the 5^*" Respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶277

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.CHIDAMBARAM

¶278

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶279

¶280

WRIT PETITION NO: 3169 OF 2021

¶281

Between:

¶282

Padala Abhi Ram, b/o Venkata Rami Reddy, Aged abuuL 25 yrs, R/o Komaripalcm Village, Bikkavolu Mandal, East Godavari District.

¶283

...Petitioner

¶284

AND

¶285

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. Secratary^{Home,Secratarait,} Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Gunturu District.

¶286

The Director General of Police, Govt, of A.P, Mangalagiri,^{Amaravathi,GunturDistrict.} 3. The Superintending of Police, East Godavari District,^Kakinada. 4. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Ramachandrapuram^{Sub-Division,} Ramachandrapuram, East Godavari District.

¶287

The SHO, Bikkavolu PS, East Godavari District.

¶288

The SHO, Bommuru PS, Rajamahendravaram Urban, East^{GodavariDistrict.}

¶289

...Respondents

¶290

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order direction more particularly one in the^{natureofwritofMANDAMUSdeclare} the proceedings of the 4'’*’ respondent opened and^{continuingtheRowdysheetagainst the} petitioner in C.No.l5/Rowdy/SDPO-RCPM/2020dt 16.11.2020^as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the life and liberty as guaranteed the petitioner under the Provisions of the Constitution of India as well as the law laid down by the constitutional courts and contrary to the order No.601(A) of the AP Police Manual^{basingontheRegistrationof} Crimes in between the two political parties and violative^{ofArt.14,19and21ofthe} Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents to close the Rowdy sheet against the petitioner.

¶291

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶292

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedinthe} affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High^Court may^{bepleasedtosuspendthe} operation of the petitioner C.No.l5/Rowdy/SDPO-RCPM/2020 dt:16.11.2020 pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶293

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P R K AMERANDRA KUMAR

¶294

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶295

WRIT PETITION NO: 8207 OF 2021

¶296

Between:

¶297

Yarra Srikrishna, S/o Chittibabu, Aged about 27 years,^{NearZim,Kothamundu,Peddapuram,} East Godavari District.

¶298

...Petitioner

¶299

AND

¶300

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶301

The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District^atKakinada. 3. The Sub Divisional Police Officer (D.S.P), Peddapuram,^{EastGodavariDistrict,} 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Peddapuram, East^{GodavariDistrict.} 5. The Sub-Inspector of Police (S.H.O), Peddapuram^{PoliceStation,Jaggampeta,East} Godavari District.

¶302

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that ,in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Cnurt may he pleased to

¶303

¶304

issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing rowdy sheet vide No. 805, of 2018 in Peddapuram Police Station, Peddapuram, East Godavari District is illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also A.P. Police Standing Order 601 and consequently set aside the rowdy sheet stated supra.

¶305

lA NO: 1 OF 7071

¶306

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to calf me to the police station to the Police Station in connection with Rowdy Sheet No. 805 of 2018 in Peddapuram Police Station, Peddapuram, East Godavari District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

¶307

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.SUBBA REDDY

¶308

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶309

WRIT PETITION NO: 8516 OF 2021 Between:

¶310

Sinka Raniarao, S/o. Pyddayya, Aged about 30 years, R/o Varisam Village, Vansthala Mandal, Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner

¶311

AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat Velagapudi Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam District. 3. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. 4. The Station House Officer, J.R Puram Police Station Srikakulam District.

...Respondents

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings in opening Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner bearing No 42 on the file of the S.H.O J.R Puram Police Station, Srikakulam District, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶316

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶317

WRIT PETITION NO: 11009 OF 2021

¶318

Between:

¶319

Vangal Chandra Sekhara Reddy, S/o Baleeswara Reddy, Aged 48 years, Occ; Arqiculturalist R/o H.IMo.28/794-3-1, NGO's Colony, Nadyala, Near Om Shanthi Board, Nadyala Rural' Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

...Petitioner

AND

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The SuperintendeiiL uf Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District, A.P. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandyal, Kurnool District, A.P. 4. The Circle Inspector, Panyam Village, Kurnool District,^A.P. 5. The Station House Officer, Gadivemula Police Station, Gadivemula Mandal, Kurnool District, A.P.

¶324

...Respondents

¶325

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4^'^ and 5*'’ respondent continuing the Rowdy Sheet bearing No.52 of 2005 issued vide proceeding no. C.No.875/SDPO-N/2005 based on the solitary instance even though the petitioner is acquitted in the said above case and even though the prescription under police standing order 601 and 742 are not fulfilled by yielding to the pressures brought out by the local political leaders and making him to sit there for hours together offering threats to him on pretext of counseling time and again, requiring his bind over as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the letter and spirit of catena of Judgments rendered by Honourable Supreme Court on Human Dignity and protection of Human Rights apart from being violative of Articles 14, 19, 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet against the petitioner.

¶326

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶327

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner without there being any crime registered against him on the pretext of continuance of rowdy sheet by calling him to the police station and making him sit hours together pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶328

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.NITESH

¶329

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶330

WRIT PETITION NO: 11844 OF 2021

¶331

Between:

¶332

Pamu Kishore Kumar @ Pamula Kishore, S/o.Sreeramulu, Aged 24 years, Occ. Un-Employee, R/o.Somidavalasa Village, Therlam Mandal, Vizianagaram^District.

¶333

...Petitioner AND

¶334

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur^District. 2. Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram District. 3. Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Bobbili Sub-Division, Vizianagaram District. 4. Station House Officer, Therlam Police Station. Vizianagaram^District. 5. Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Srikakulam Sub-Division,^{SrikakulamDistrict.} 6. Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Srikakulam^District.

¶335

...Respondents

¶336

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed, therewith, the High Court may be pleased to

¶337

¶338

issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 to 6 on the petitioner's representations dated 19.01.2021 and 15.03.2021 submitted to close the Rowdy Sheet proceedings C.No.80/SDPO-S/H.S12015, dated 22.12.2015 and Rowdy Sheet No 112 issued by the 5th respondent and the same is transferred to the 3^'^ respondent and the said rowdy sheet proceedings and rowdy sheet which is pending and continuing against the petitioner's on the rolls of 4'^ respondent police station, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of the Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Orders and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently quash Rowdy Sheet proceedings C.N0.8O/SDPOS/H.S/2015, dated 22.12.2015 and Rowdy Sheet No.112 issued by the 5' respondent and directs the respondents not to interfere with his liberty in any manner in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 7071 few Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances^stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.01.2021 and 15.03.2021 Sheet proceedings C.No.80/SDPO-S/H.S/2015, dated p.l2 2015 and Rowdy Sheet No.112 issued by the S'"'^{respondentandthesame} is transferred to the 3 respondent and the said rowdy sheet proceedings and rowdy sheet Which IS pending and continuing against the petitioner's on the rolls of 4‘^ respondent police station and consequently directs the respondents not to pay domiciliary visits to the pebtioners house nor insist upon him appearance before them, pending disposal of the mam writ petition. a p

¶339

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVAS AMBATI

¶340

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶341

WRIT PETITION NO: 12911 OF 7071

¶342

Between:

¶343

Guv^a Rannesh Reddy @ Chitti, S/o.Sri G.Rama Krishna Reddy Hindu, aged 42 years R/o.Thellanellapalfe H/o.Gaddamvaripalli Pnr.Thayat Chowdepalle Mandal, Chittoor District!

¶344

...Petitioner

¶345

1 nn, r- Prsdesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department, ^cretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur^DistrictAP

¶346

1. The Superintendent, of Chittoor District, Chittoor AP 3. Je Sub.Divisional Police Officer, Palamaner, Chittoor^DistrictAP 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Chowdepalle Police Station Chowdepalle, Chittoor District Andhra Pradesh

¶347

...Respondents

¶348

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit hied therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings of the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in opening rowdy sheet No 13 of Chowdepalle Police Station, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh against the petitioner is arbitrary, illegal, malafide and violation, of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent herein to close the rowdy sheet, opened against the pphfinner an d further direct not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner

¶349

¶350

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶351

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4*'’ Respondent herein not to call the petitioner to the police station pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶352

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D KODANDARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶353

WRIT PETITION NO: 16844 OF 2021

¶354

Between:

¶355

Vuyyuru Phaneendra Reddy, S/o. Nagi Reddy, aged about 38 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.4-63, Nidamarru (V), Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur^{District-522503}

¶356

...Petitioner

¶357

AND

¶358

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Vetagapudi, Amaravathi, A.P.

¶359

The Superintendent of Police, (Urban), Guntur District,^AP.

¶360

The Sub Divisional Police Officer, North Sub-Division, Guntur Urban, Guntur District, AP

¶361

The Inspector of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur District,^A.P. 5. The Station House Officer, Mangalagiri Rural Police Station, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, AP

¶362

Asodi Srinivasa Reddy, Sub Inspector of Police, Presently attached to Sub Divisional Police Officer, North Sub-Division, Guntur Urban, Guntur District, AP

¶363

...Respondents

¶364

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing impugned proceedings vide C.No.06/BCs/SDPO-NORTH/GTR(U)/ 2021, dated 10.04.2021, where under permission was granted to Respondent No.5 to open a Rowdy sheet against the petitioner and keep close watch over his movements and run him under Security Sections of law whenever necessary to curb his movements, as being illegal and arbitrary as well as against the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 21, 19 (a), (b), (d) and (g) of the Constitution of India as well as the settled proposition of law laid down by the Constitutional Courts and consequently to set aside the same, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings vide C.No.06/BCs/SDPO-NORT H/GTR(U)/2021, dated 10.04.2021 issued by the 3"'’ Respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition, in the interest of justice.

¶365

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI

¶366

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶367

¶368

WRIT PETITION NO: 17414 OF 2071

¶369

Between:

¶370

Tanneru Lima Maheswara Rao, S/o late Venkateswarlu, aged about 65 years, R/o HIG-14 Midilapuri, Vuda Colony, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam.

¶371

...Petitioner AND

¶372

State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the Principal Secretary Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶373

The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Madhurawada Sub-Division, Visakhapatnam 5. The Inspector of Police, P.M.Patem Police Station, Visakhapatnam. G. The Inspectot of Police, II Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam

¶374

...Respondents

¶375

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 5^'’ respondent in continuing/maintaining the rowdy sheet No.1/2011, dated 4.1.2011 against the petitioner as illegal, contrary to law and yiolation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the rowdy sheet No.1/2011, dated 4.1.2011 on the file of the 5^^ respondent Police Station, which is continuing against the petitioner, pending disposal of writ petition.

¶376

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR

¶377

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶378

WRIT PETITION NO: 17439 OF 2021

¶379

Between:

¶380

Boya Shiva Kumar, S/o Boya Chinna Maddileti, Aged about 28 years, R/o D.No.8-108, B.C. Colony, Midthur village and Mandal,^Kurnool District, Kurnool District.

¶381

...Petitioner

¶382

¶383

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Deaprtment, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravatl, Guntur District.

¶384

1. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3. The Station House Officer, Midthur Police Station Midthur, Kurnool District.

...Respondents

continuing the Suspect/Rowdy Sheet No.276 in the name of the petitioner on the file of the Midthur Police Station^^{KutnoolDistrictas} illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3'"'* respondent to close the Suspect/Rowdy Sheet No. 276 in the name of the petitioner on the file of the Midthur Police Station, Kurnool District.

¶389

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶390

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent^toclosethe Suspect/Rowdy Sheet No. 276 on the file of the Midthur Police Station, Kurnool District forthwith pending disposal of the^mainW.P.

¶391

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B S VENKATA RAMESH

¶392

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶393

WRIT PETITION NO: 17658 OF 2021

¶394

Between:

¶395

Penumaia Dharma, S/o Bojja, Working as teacher Mandal Praja Parishat Primary School, Nadimivalasa, Arma Panchayati, Dumbriguda Mandal, Visakhapatnam^District

¶396

...Petitioner

¶397

AND

¶398

Station House Officer, Dumbriguda Police station, Visakhapatnam District 2. The Inspector of Police, Araku Valley, Visakhapatnam^District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati

¶399

...Respondents

¶400

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, dedaring the action of the respondents In directing the petitioner to appear before the police station and threatening to open a rowdy sheet against petitioner and threatening that petitioner should appear before him whenever they call and sit there from morning to evening, without there being any case or any report against petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and unjust against my fundamental rights of living peacefully and respectably and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner peaceful daily life in any manner whatsoever such as calling to the police station and making to sit there without any legal proceedings.

¶401

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶402

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an interim direction against the respondents not to call petitioner to the police station and to make to sit there and not to threaten petitioner of opening a rowdy sheet without any statutory proceedings during the pendency of this writ petition.

¶403

¶404

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶405

WRIT PETITION NO: 18037 OF 2021

¶406

Between:

¶407

Boya Sekhar, S/o. Boya Nallanna, aged about 26 years, R/o. H.No. 7-44, Boya Veedhi, C Belagat village and Mandal, Kurnool District

¶408

...Petitioner

¶409

AND

¶410

The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by It s Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secreteriait Buildings, Velaqapudi, Guntur^Dist. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District at^Kurnool. 3. The Station House Officer, C-Belagal Police Station, C-Belagal, Kurnool District.

¶411

...Respondents

¶412

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents more particularly that of 3'''' respondent in continuing rowdy sheet against the petitioner and further binding him over before Special Executive Magistrate as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the letter and spirit of Judgment a Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court of AP in WA No. 1874/2003 dated 4.11.2003 and WP No. 11475/2020 and Batch dated 26.08.2020 as well catena of Judgments rendered by Honorable Supreme Court on Human Dignity and protection of Human Rights apart from being violative of Articles 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner.

¶413

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶414

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein not to call the petitioner by infringing his personal liberty without there being any crime registered against him, pending disposal of the Writ Petition pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶415

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI 3 U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶416

WRIT PETITION NO: 18172 OF 2021

¶417

Between:

¶418

Boya Tirumalesu, S/o. Boya Naganna, aged about 24 years, R/o. C Belagal village and Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Petitioner

¶419

AND

¶420

The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by It s Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur^Dist. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District at^Kurnool. 3. The Station House Officer, C-Belagal Police Station, C-Belagal, Kurnool District.

...Respondents

sheet against the petitioner and further binding him over before Special Executive Magistrate as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the letter and spirit of Judgment a Division Bench of this Hon'ble Cntjrf of AP in WA No. 1874/2003 dated 4.11.2003 and WP No. 11475/2020 and Batch dated 26.08.2020 as well catena of Judgments rendered by Honorable Supreme Court on Human Dignity and protection of Human Rights apart from being violative of Articles 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner.

¶425

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶426

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein not to call the petitioner by infringing his personal liberty without there being any crime registered against him, pending disposal of the Writ Petition pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶427

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶428

WRIT PETITION NO: 18187 OF 2021

¶429

Between:

¶430

Boya Ramanjaneyulu, S/o. Chinna Muneppa, aged about 42 years, R/o. C Belagal village and Mandal, Kurnool District.

¶431

...Petitioner

¶432

AND

¶433

The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by It s Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur^Dist.

¶434

The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District at^Kurnool. 3. The Station House Officer, C-Belagal Police Station, C-Belagal, Kurnool District.

¶435

...Respondents

¶436

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents more particularly that of 3'''' respondent in continuing rowdy sheet against the petitioner and further binding him over before Special Executive Magistrate as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the letter and spirit of Judgment a Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court of AP in WA No. 1874/2003 dated 4.11.2003 and WP No. 11475/2020 and Batch dated 26.08.2020 as well catena of Judgments rendered by Honorable Supreme Court on Human Dignity and protection of Human Rights apart from being violative of Articles 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently set aside the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner.

¶437

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶438

¶439

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J U M V PRASAD

¶440

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶441

¶442

WRIT PETITION NO: 19025 OF 2021

¶443

Between:

¶444

Meenuga Madhu Babu, S/o. M Nagendra Babu aged about 42 years, Occ. RTI Activist 86 Para legal volunteer, R/o D.No. 10-1-32, 10* Ward, SC Colony, Uravakonda Town 86 Mandal, Ananthapur District. ...Petitioner

¶445

AND

¶446

State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the Principal Secretary Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶447

The Superintendent of Police, Ananthapur District,^{AndhraPradesh.} 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, Uravakonda Police Station, Uravakonda, Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶448

...Respondents

¶449

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus calling for records pertaining to Rowdy Sheet No. 685/UKD before the Uravakonda Police Station, Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh and quash the same as being arbitrary, illegal, ultra vires the provisions of the AP Police Standing order as well as in violation of Article 14, Article 19 86 Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

¶450

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶451

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to produce the record pertaining to the opening and continuance of the rowdy sheet No 685/UKD pending before the Uravakonda Police station before this Honourable Court forthwith.

¶452

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶453

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the third respondent not to call the petitioner to the police station or harass the petitioner in lieu of the rowdy sheet No 685/UKD pending before the Uravakonda Police station.

¶454

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI HAMSA DEVINENI

¶455

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶456

WRIT PETITION NO: 20048 OF 2021 Between;

¶457

Palanati Narendra Reddy, S/o. Gopal Reddy, Aged 32 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o. Budiapalem , Mogallur Panchayat, Veligandia Mandal, Prakasam^District. ...Petitioner

¶458

AND

¶459

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶460

Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, at Ongole. 3. Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kandukur, Prakasam^District. 4. Sub inspector of Police, /Station House Officer, Kanigiri Police Station, Kanigiri, Prakasam District.

¶461

...Respondents

¶462

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to

¶463

¶464

issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly^{oneinthenatureof'WritofMandamus'} declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 herein in not closing the History Sheet (Rowdy Sheet) No.4, opened against the Petitioner on 23- 10-2011 inspite of the acquittal of the petitioner in Sessions Case No. 19 of 2012 dated 13-12-2018, on the file of the Special Judge for Trail of Offences under Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - cumAdditional District and Sessions Judge, Prakasam District at Ongole, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to dose the History Sheet (Rowdy Sheet) No.4 opened against the petitioner by the 4^*^ respondent forthwith.

¶465

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶466

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to interfere in any manner into the personal life and liberty of petitioner, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶467

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶468

WRIT PETITION NO: 20455 OF 2021

¶469

Between:

¶470

Karri Soma Pocheswara Rao, S/o Satyanarayana, Hindu, aged 50 years, Occ. Government Servant, R/o 64-16-6/2, Pratap Nagar, Kakinad Urban, Gandhinagar, East Godavari District. ...Petitioner

¶471

AND

¶472

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District,^Kakinada. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ramachandrapuram,^{EastGodavariDistrict.} 4. The Station House Officer, Biccavolu Police Station, Biccavolu, East Godavari District

¶473

...Respondents

¶474

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue, a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of 3'”'^ respondent in issuing the proceedings C.No.l8/Rowdy/SDPO-RCPM/2020dated 16.11.2020 in opening the Rowdy Sheet being illegal, arbitrary in contravention of provisions of Order 601 of AP Police Manual and Order 742 of AP Police Standing Orders and in violation of. Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents herein to quash the Rowdy Sheet.

¶475

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶476

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the Proceedings C.No.l8/Rowdy/SDPO-RCPM/2020dated 16.11.2020 issued by the 3 rd respondent pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶477

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K SRINIVASA PRASAD

¶478

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶479

¶480

WRIT PETITION NO: 20946 OF 2021

¶481

Between:

¶482

Vemula Meera Vali, S/o Srinivasulu Aged about 28 years, R/o H.No. 1/163, Vonipenta viHaqe Mydukur Mandat, YSR Kadapa District.

¶483

...Petitioner

¶484

AND

¶485

The Station House Office, Mydukur (U/G) police station Mydukur, YSR Kadapa District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Proddutur, YSR Kadapa District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa^District. 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rept. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶486

...Respondents

¶487

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent Nos.l to 3 in opening the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner and continuing the same in the 1st respondent police station based on involvement in Cr.No.69/2012 and the same was closed in C.C.No.143/2012 on 20-022017 as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to close Rowdy Sheet pending against the petitioner in the 1st respondent police station forthwith in the interest of justice.

¶488

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶489

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be to direct respondent Nos.l to 3 not to disturb the personal liberty of the petitioner on the ground of pendency of Rowdy Sheet in the 1'^ respondent police station pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice.

¶490

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NAGENDRA REDDY

¶491

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶492

WRIT PETITION NO: 26749 OF 2021

¶493

Between:

¶494

Gattupalli Panduranga Rao, S/o. Koteswara Rao, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Manager, Endowment Department, R/o. Chebrolu Village and Mandal,^{GunturDistrict} ...Petitioner

¶495

AND

¶496

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur^District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District at Guntur. 3. Deputy Sub-Divisional Police Officer, (South), Guntur Urban, Guntur District. 4. Station House Officer, Chebrolu Police Station, Guntur^District.

¶497

...Respondents

¶498

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a- writ, order or direction more particulaily one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 4^*^ respondent in insisting the petitioner to appear

¶499

¶500

before his authority and fixed the petitioner photo -on the notice board by indicating he is a rowdy sheeter, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with the petitioner personal life and liberty and further direct to the 4^’’ respondent to remove petitioner photo on the display board.

¶501

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶502

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in any manner by summoning the petitioner to appear before his authority and further direct to the 4^*’ respondent to remove his photo forthwith on the display board by indicating he is a rowdy sheeter, pending disposal of main writ petition.

¶503

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.SRIHARI

¶504

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶505

WRIT PETITION NO: 29372 OF 2021

¶506

Between:

¶507

Katabathina Penchalaiah, S/o Ramarnurthi, aged about 20 years, R/o Kuricharlapadu village, Venkatachalam Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.

¶508

...Petitioner

¶509

¶510

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its PrI. Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶511

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Women Police Station, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District.

¶512

The Station House Officer, V.Satram Police Station, Venkatachalam, SPSR Nellore District.

¶513

...Respondents

¶514

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner on the file of V.Satram Police Station, Venkatachalam, SPSR Nellore District and continuing the same as illegal, arbitrary and Violative^{ofArticle21ofConstitutionofIndia} and Consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to dose the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner on the file of V.Satram Police Station, Venkatachalam, SPSR Nellore District.

¶515

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶516

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner on the file of the V.Satram Police Station, Venkatachalam, SPSR Nellore District forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶517

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.GANGA RAMI REDDY

¶518

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶519

¶520

WRIT PETITION NO: 993 OF 2022

¶521

Between:

¶522

PutsaJogaRao, S/o. P. Nayakanna, Aged 30 years, R/o. D.No.1-592, Peddamuraharipuram Village, VajrapukothuruMandal, Srikakulam^District.

¶523

Putcha Ravi Teja, S/o. P. Paparao, Aged 23 years, R/o. D.No.2-587, Gandhi Veedhi, Peddamuraharipuram Village, VajrapukothuruMandal, Srikakulam^District

¶524

...Petitioners

¶525

AND

¶526

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶527

Superintendentof Police, Srikakulam District, Srikakulam. 3. Deputy Superintendent of Police/Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kasibuqqa, Srikakulam District.

¶528

Sub inspector of Police/Station House Officer, Vajrapukothuru Police Station, Vajrapukotturu Mandal, Srikakulam District.

¶529

...Respondents

¶530

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 herein in not closing the Rowdy Sheet Nos.l of 2017 and 5 of 2017, opened against the Petitioners, inspite of the acquittal of the petitioners in SC.No.2/2018 dated 30-11-2018, on the file of the Court off the Special Judge for Trial of Cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - cum - 1st Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Srikakulam, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheets opened against the petitioners by the 4^" respondent, forthwith.

¶531

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶532

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to interfere in any manner into the personal life and liberty of petitioners, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶533

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENKATA REDDY CHITTEM

¶534

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶535

WRIT PETITION NO: 3223 OF 2022

¶536

Between:

¶537

Paila Yesu @ Paila Esu @ Shevag, S/o Mani Raju, 39 years, Occ: Daily Labour, Gowrinagar, NAD Kotta Road, Visakhapatnam (Urban), Visakhapatnam.

¶538

...Petitioner

¶539

AND

¶540

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶541

The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Kolanukonda, Mangalagiri, Guntur District.

¶542

The Assistant Commissioner o^ Police, West Zone,^{VijayawadaKrishnaDistrict.} 4. The Station House Officer, II lown Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 5. The Station House Officer, Airport Police Station, Visakhapatnam.

¶543

...Respondents

¶544

¶545

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue on appropriate writ oidei ut diredion more particularly one In the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening, continuing and transferring the Rowdy Sheet No. R12/2T/VC/2009 (C.No.405/ACP-WD /2009), dated 0304-2009 on the file of 4*'^ respondent-police station maintained by 3rd respondent, now trying to transfer the same to 5^'' respondent police station against the petitioner herein as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to close and to quash the Rowdy Sheet No. R12/2T/VC/2009 (C.No.405/ACP-WD/200 9), dated 03.042009 on 4' respondent-police station maintained by 3'''’ respondent against the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 207? Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly 3'’'^ and 4‘^ respondents herein not to transfer the Rowdy Sheet No. R12/2T/VC/2009 (C.No.405/ACP-WD/2009), dated 03-04-2009 on the file of 4th respondent-police station maintained by 3rd respondent herein to the 5th respondentpolice station and not to harass the petitioner on the pretext of the rowdysheet, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶546

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CHALLA AJAY KUMAR

¶547

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶548

WRIT PETITION NO: 3283 OF 2022

¶549

Between:

¶550

Kanubuddi Ramana Reddy, S/o. Narayana Reddy, Aged 36 years, R/o. Nandipalem Village, Podili Mandal, Prakasam District.

¶551

...Petitioner

¶552

¶553

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District.

¶554

1. Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. Additiorial Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam^District. 4. Sub Divisional Police Officer-cum-Deputy Superintendent of Police, Darsi, Prakasam District.

¶555

1. Inspector of Police, Podili Circle, Podili, Prakasam^District. 6. Station House Officer, Podili Police Station, Podili,^{PrakasamDistrict.}

¶556

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly of the respondents 5 and 6 in continuing the Rowdy Sheet / Suspect Sheet opened against the petitioner on the rolls of 6th Respondent in spite of the predecessor of the 6'^'’ respondent sought permission by Letter dt. 20.09.2019 from the 4^*’ respondent to close Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner and in insisting the petitioner to repeatedly appear before the 6th respondent once in every week under the guise of keeping his movements under dose watch, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and violative of Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Orders and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently quash the said Suspect / Rowdy Sheet opened against the petitioner on the rolls of the 6“

¶557

¶558

respondent and direct the respondents particularly the respondent not to interfere with thre petitioner's personal life and liberty in any manner in the interest of justice.

¶559

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶560

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit hied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly 6'^ respondent not to pay domiciliary visits to the petitioner's house nor insist upon his appearance before them, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.

¶561

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SARATH KUMAR D

¶562

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶563

WRIT PETITION NO: 4340 OF 2022

¶564

Between:

¶565

Shaik Nabi Rasool, S/o. Shaik Burhan, Aged about 22 years, D.No. 8/310, Near Old Aniineya Swamy temple, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District.

¶566

...Petitioner

¶567

AND

¶568

State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi rep. by its Secretary.

¶569

The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Adoni, Kurnool District.

¶570

The Station House Officer, Yemmiganur Town Police Station, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District.

¶571

...Respondents

¶572

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No. 4 in entering the petitioner's name in the suspects list and continuing his name in the said list and harassing him by calling him to police station under the pretext of enquiry without any complaint against him, as illegal, arbitrary, unwarranted, unjust, and violative of Art.,14, 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India and consequently DIRECT the respondents to remove the name of the petitioner from the suspects list and not to harass him.

¶573

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶574

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to harass the petitioner, pending disposal of above writ petition.

¶575

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER

¶576

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶577

¶578

WRIT PETITION NO: 6743 OF 2022

¶579

Between:

¶580

Bogathi Vijay Prathap Reddy, aged about 50 years S/o Bogathi Narayana Reddy, R/o 1-54-C, OC Colony, Vennapusapalli Yellanur Mandal, Anantapuramu^{District-515465}

¶581

...Petitioner

¶582

AND

¶583

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi Village, Guntur District.

¶584

The Superintendent of Police, Anantapur District, Anantapuram, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Tadipatri Division, AnantapuramDistrict, Andhra Pradesh.

¶585

The Station House Officer, Yellanur PS, Anantapuramu^District. 5. The Station House Officer, Putlur P.S Anantapuramu^District. 6. The Station House Officer, Tadipatri Town P.S. Anantapuramu^District

¶586

...Respondents

¶587

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in continuing the name of petitioner on the rolls of Rowdy sheet vide No. 106/1998 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Police Standing Orders apart from violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under^Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct the respondents to forthwith remove the name of petitioner from Rowdy sheet.

¶588

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶589

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the respondents not to call and detain the petitioner as per the Rowdy sheet No. 106/1998, pending disposal of main Writ Petition.

¶590

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI HARISH KUMAR RASINENI

¶591

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶592

WRIT PETITION NO: 6753 OF 2022

¶593

Between:

¶594

K Srinivasarao@ Vasu, S/o. Ramaiah, aged about 43 years, R/o. Pandillapalll, Vetapalem Mandal, Prakasam District.

¶595

...Petitioner

¶596

AND

¶597

The Station House Officer, Vetapalem, Prakasam District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Chirala, Prakasam District. 3. The Dy. Superintendent of Police, Chirala, Prakasam^District. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, Ongole. 5. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District.

...Respondents

against the petitioner before the respondent Police Station as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet pending before the respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 20??

¶602

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1"' respondent not to interfere with petitioners life and liberty by calling petitioner to police station under guise of rowdy sheet pending before the 1"^ respondent against the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶603

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO

¶604

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶605

WRIT PETITION NO: 7284 OF 2027

¶606

Between: 1. Naganandi Ramakrishna @ Pichiguntia Ramakrishna, S/o. Naganandi Venkateswarlu, M Years, R/o. Rudravaram Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Andhra Pradesh.

¶607

1. Naganandi Madhu @ Pichiguntia Madhu, S/o. Naganandi Ramudu @ Medimedde Pradesh' Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Andhra

¶608

Naganandi Sreenivasulu @ Seenu, S/o Naganandi Chinna Pullaiah @ Medimedde Pullaiah Aged 48 Years, R/o. Rudravaram Village, Pamulapadu Mandal,

¶609

Andhra Pradesh.

¶610

Gadesina Nagasheshulu @ Pichiguntia Nagaseshuiu, S/o. Gadesina Jammanna <a Pichguntia Jammanna Aged 49 Years, R/o. Rudravaram Village, Pamulapadu

¶611

Mandal, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioners

¶612

AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Deputy General of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh 3. Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh 4. Station House Officer, Pamulapadu Police Station, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh ...Respondents

¶613

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the action of the Respondent authorities in continuing-Rowdy Sheet No. 39 (II). Naganandi Madhu - Rowdy Sheet No. 40, (III). Naganandi Sreenivasulu (g) Seenu - Rowdy Sheet No. 41 and (IV). Gadesina Nagasheshulu @ Pichiguntia Nagaseshuiu - Rowdy Sheet No. 41, Rowdy Sheet opened in the year 2018, at Pamulapadu Police Station, Kurnool District as illegal, arbitrary and also contrary to the A.P Police Standing Orders and also against the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the Respondent Authorities to close the Rowdy Sheet which was opened against the petitioners and also^further direct the respondent Police^to remove the names of the Petitioners from the Kowdy Sheet Board in Pamulapadu Police Station at Kurnool.

¶614

¶615

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶616

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Police not to summon the Petitioners to the Police Station, Pamulapadu, Kurnool District.

¶617

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI Y.BALAJI

¶618

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶619

WRIT PETITION NO: 7525 OF 2022

¶620

Between:

¶621

Chilukuri Prasad, S/o. Sri. Venkata Rao, Hindu, Aged about 55 Years, Occ- Business, R/o Door No. 13-105/1, Cotton Peta, 2"^ Street, Dowlaiswaram - 533 125, East Godavari District.

¶622

Dasari Raj Kumar, S/o. Sri Krishna, Hindu, Aged about 28 years, OccBusiness, R/o.Door No. 109-2-26, Netaji Nagar, Bommuru - 533 124, Rajamahendravaram Rural, East Godavari District. ...Petitioners

¶623

AND

¶624

State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its PrI. Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi - 522 237, Guntur District.

¶625

The Superintendent of Police, Rajamahendravaram Urban Police District, Rajamahendravaram - 533 103, East Godavari District

¶626

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, South Zone, Rajamahendravaram Urban Police District, Rajamahendravaram - 533 103, East Godavari^District

¶627

The Station House Officer, Dowlaiswaram P.S., Dowlaiswaram - 533 125, East Godavari District.

...Respondents

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to summon the Petitioner to the police station pursuant to the 'Rowdy Sheet' opened against him on the file of the 4‘^ Respondent, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition.

¶632

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI N.SIVA REDDY

¶633

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶634

WRIT PETITION NO: 7652 OF 2022

¶635

Between:

¶636

M.Mallikarjuna, S/o M.Vannurappa, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o Pulagutta Palli, Guntakol Rural, Annntapur District. ...Petitioner

¶637

¶638

AND

¶639

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by it's Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District 2. The Superintend of Police, Anantapur, Anantapur^District 3. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Guntakal, Anantapur^District 4. The Station House Officer, Guntakal Rural Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District.

...Respondents

lA NO: 1 OF 202?,

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to not to call the Petitioner to Police Station by assigning the reason that Petitioner being a Rowdy Sheeter they have to keep a vigilance on the petitioner.

¶644

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY

¶645

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶646

WRIT PETITION NO: 8911 OF 2022

¶647

Between:

¶648

Chekuri Sudhakar Raju, S/o. Puma Chandar Raju, Aged 51 years, R/o. Flat No. C-3, 3' Floor, D. No. 8-2-468/A/l, Paradise Residency, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. ...Petitioner

¶649

AND

¶650

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,

¶651

The Assistant Commissioner of Police Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, A.P.

¶652

The Commissioner of PoHce, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, A.P. 4. The Inspector of Police, P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶653

The Station House Officer, P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶654

...Respondents

¶655

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of Certiorari by calling for the entire records pertaining to the Rowdy Sheet/ History Sheet No.2 of 2017 dated 22.07.2017 on the file of the P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District on the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and also in violation of the Police Standing Orders and consequently Quash and set-aside the Rowdy Sheet/History Sheet No.2 of 2017 dated 22.07.2017 on the file of the P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District against the petitioner.

¶656

¶657

lA NO: 1 OF 7n?7

¶658

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Sheet No.2 of 2017 dated 2^^2017'^^ the filing of a certified copy of Rowdy

¶659

lA NO; 2 OF 2022

¶660

under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to suspend the Rowdy Sheet/History Sheet No.2 of 2017 dated 22.07 2017 on the file of the P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District against the petitioner, forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶661

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V VINOD K REDDY

¶662

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶663

WRIT PETITION NO: 11073 OF 2022

¶664

Between:

¶665

Korugodu Veeranna @ S/o. K. Chinna Veeranna, Hindu, aged about 24 yeare, R/o. 24102, Vijaya Cloth Circle, Old Town, Anantapuram Town and District.

¶666

...Petitioner

¶667

1 -ru r. and 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Vetagapudi, Amaravathi.

¶668

1. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram.

¶669

J. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram. 4. The Station House Officer, I Town PS, Anantapuram Town and District.

¶670

...Respondents

¶671

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet bearing No. 611 of I Town PS, Anantapuram Town against the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the said rowdy sheet in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 7077 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against him, pending the Writ Petition.

¶672

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

¶673

Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR HOME

¶674

¶675

WRIT PETITION NO: 11081 OF 2022

¶676

Between:

¶677

Vefur Shaik Sadiqu Vali @ Miah, S/o. V. Mahib Sab, Muslim, aged about 39 years, R/o. 28113, Boya Street, Anantapuram Town and District.

¶678

...Petitioner

¶679

AND

¶680

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.

¶681

The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram. 4. The Station House Officer, I Town PS, Anantapuram own and District.

¶682

...Respondents

¶683

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fifed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet bearing No. 601 of I Town PS, Anantapuram Town against the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the said rowdy sheet in the interest of justice.

¶684

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶685

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not, to summon the petitioner to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against him, pending the Writ Petition.

¶686

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

¶687

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶688

WRIT PETITION NO: 11167 OF 2022

¶689

Between:

¶690

Alishar Shaik Masoom Baba, S/o. A. Ismail Sab, Muslim, aged about 60 years, R/o. 12-3899, 1^ cross, Vidyuth Nagar, Anantapuram Town and^District.

¶691

...Petitioner

¶692

AND

¶693

The State of A.P, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.

¶694

The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram. 4. The Station House Officer, II Town PS, Anantapuram^{TownandDistrict.}

...Respondents

lA NO: 1 OF 20??

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner, pending the Writ Petition.

¶700

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

¶701

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶702

WRIT PETITION NO: 11169 OF 2022

¶703

Between:

¶704

Shaik Chetia Baba Vali, S/o. S.C. Fakruddin, Muslim, aged about 33 years, R/o. 25-309, Asar Street, Anantapuram Town and District.

¶705

...Petitioner

¶706

AND

¶707

The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.

¶708

The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram.

¶709

The Station House Officer, I Town PS, Anantapuram^{TownandDistrict.}

¶710

¶711

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶712

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against him, pending the Writ Petition.

¶713

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

¶714

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶715

WRIT PETITION NO: 11170 OF 2022

¶716

Between:

¶717

Syed Mahaboob Basha, S/o. Sayed Shaiksha Vali, Muslim, aged about 26 years, R/o. 22-369, Gold Smith Street, Old Town, Anantapuram Town and District

¶718

...Petitioner AND 1. The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Super inlefideiiL of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram.

¶719

¶720

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram. 4. The Station House Officer, I Town PS, Anantapuram^{TownandDistrict.}

¶721

¶722

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶723

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against him, pending the Writ Petition.

¶724

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

¶725

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶726

WRIT PETITION NO: 11171 OF 7077

¶727

Between: Katika Babji Rao @ Babji, S/o. K. Venkat Rao, aged about 26 years, R/o. 26-255, Momeen Street, Old Town, Anantapuram Town and District.

¶728

...Petitioner AND

¶729

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.

¶730

The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram. 4. The Station House Officer, I Town PS, Anantapuram Town and District.

...Respondents

lA NO: 1 OF 2077

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against him, pending the Writ Petition.

¶735

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

¶736

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶737

¶738

WRIT PETITION NO: 11442 OF 2022

¶739

Between:

¶740

Khaji Mahammad Jeelan Basha, S/o. K.M. Rafiq, Muslim, aged about 22 years, R/o. 12-3899, ISt cross, Vidyuth Nagar, Anantapuram Town and^District.

¶741

...Petitioner

¶742

AND

¶743

The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Vetagapudi, Amaravathi.

¶744

The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram District, Anantapuram.

¶745

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer,, Anantapuram.

¶746

The Station House Officer, II Town PS, Anantapuram^{TownandDistrict.}

¶747

...Respondents

¶748

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly^one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet bearing No. 524 of II Town PS, Anantapuram Town against the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the said rowdy sheet in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon me to the police station as part of surveillance or otherwise on the basis of rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner, pending the Writ Petition.

¶749

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI

¶750

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶751

WRIT PETITION NO: 18696 OF 2022

¶752

Between:

¶753

Mallam Vasu, S/o.Vasantha Rao, Aged about 29 years, Occ. unemployed, R/o.D.No.18-4084, Redlla Bazar Main Road, Sangadigunta, Guntur, Guntur^District.

¶754

...Petitioner

¶755

AND

¶756

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh.

¶757

The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Tadepalli.

¶758

The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban, A.P.

¶759

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Guntur West,^Guntur

¶760

The Station House Officer, Pattabhipuram Police Station, Pattabhipuram, Guntur.

...Respondents

lA NO: 1 OF 207?

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet maintained against the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶766

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RATAN MOHAN MEDIDA

¶767

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶768

WRIT PETITION NO; 2351fi OF 7077

¶769

Between: Ju^avarapu Veerabhadram, S/o. J.Ramu, Aged about 44 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. D No 2-64, Kongara van Veedhi, Near Ramalayam, Pedapudi village, Pedapudi Mandal, East Godavari District.

¶770

...Petitioner

¶771

AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District at Kakinada. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, East Godavari District 4. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 5. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Pedapudi Police Station, East Godavari District

¶772

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing the History Sheet No.51 of 2011 in Pedapudi Police Station, Pedapudi Mandal, East Godavari district against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of mdia and also contrary to the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and batch dated 15.07.2022 and consequently set^asidethe same. lANO: lOF 2077 under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 to 5 not to call the petitioner to the Police Station in connection with History Sheet No. 51 of 2011, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

¶773

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.BALA MOHAN RAO

¶774

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶775

WRIT PETITION NO: 2T.S26 OF 2077

¶776

Between:

¶777

Jujjavarapu Srihari S/o. J.Ramu, Aged about 48 years, Occ- Agriculture, R/ o D No 2-64 East Godavari Snct"* Near Ramalayam, Pedapudi village, Pedapudi Mandal,

¶778

...Petitioner AND

¶779

¶780

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶781

The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District^atKakiriada. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, East^{GodavariDistrict.} 4. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kakinada, East^{GodavariDistrict.} 5. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Pedapudi Police Station,^{EastGodavariDistrict.}

...Respondents

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedintheaffidavit} filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 to 5 not to call the petitioner to the Police Station in connection with History Sheet No. 52 of 2011, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

¶786

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S BALA MOHAN RAO

¶787

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶788

WRIT PETITION NO: 23541 OF 2022

¶789

Between:

¶790

Jujjavarapu Srinivasa Rao @ Nallabbu, S/o. J.Ramu, Aged about 42 years, Occ- Agriculture, R/o. D.No. 2-64, Kongara vari Veedhi, Near Ramalayam, Pedapudi village, Pedapudi Mandal, East Godavari district

¶791

...Petitioner

¶792

AND

¶793

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶794

The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District^atKakinada. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, East^{GodavariDistrict.}

¶795

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kakinada, East^{GodavariDistrict.}

¶796

The Sub-Inspector of Police, Pedapudi Police Station,^{EastGodavariDistrict.}

...Respondents

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 to 5 not to call the petitioner to the Police Station in connection with History Sheet No 53 of 2011, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

¶802

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S BALA MOHAN RAO

¶803

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶804

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING COMMON ORDER;

¶805

¶806

CMR, J. W.P.No.4990 of 2016 & Batch

¶807

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH RQY

¶808

¶809

Writ Petition NOS.4990, 14611, 18284, 28889 of 2016;³¹⁸² of 2018; 4204, 10545, 11948, 12035, 17227, 19568, 19756,²⁰⁷⁷⁵ of 2019; 560, 620, 22541, 24449; 25428 of 2020; 317, 787, 3169, 8207, 8516, 11009, 11844, 12911, 16844, 17414, 17439, 17658, 18037, 18172, 18187, 19025, 20048, 20455, 20946, 26749, 29372 of 2021; 993, 3223, 3283, 4340, 6743, 6753, 7284, 7525, 7652, 8911, 11073, 11081, 11167, 11169, 11170, 11171, 11442, 18696, 23516, 23526 and 23541 of 2022

¶810

COMMON ORDER:

¶811

In this batch of Writ Petitions, the petitioners sought^either to quash the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/histoiy-sheets that are opened against them or to direct the respondent police officials to close the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/historysheets.

¶812

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing^forthe respondents.

¶813

These Writ Petitions are being disposed of without going into the merits of the cases on the ground of legal validity^ofthesaid rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets opened by invoking the provisions of A.P. Police Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders, in view of the recent common order of this High Court, dated 15.07.2022, in W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and batch, whereby this Court held that the Standing Orders of A.P. Police^Manualor A.P. Police Standing Orders to the extent of opening/continuatioⁿ of -FOK^dy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets and keeping^

¶814

CMR, J. W.P.No.4990 of 2016 & Batch

¶815

surveillance on the individuals on the basis of the said rowdysheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets, in terms of Chapter-37 of the aforesaid Standing Oi-ders, are void.

¶816

The rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/histor3t-sheets were opened against the petitioners in all tliese Writ Petitions iin terms of Chapter-37 of the A.P. Police Standing Orders or A.P. Police Manual.

¶817

The legal validity of Chapter-37 of the said A.P. Police Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders, on the basis of which the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets are being opened, has been questioned and challenged before this Cour t in W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and batch, This court, by its common order, dated 15.07.2022, passed in the above batch of Writ Petitions, after considering the law on the issue elaborately^with reference to the earlier judgmentts rendered by the Apex Court and, more particularly, with reference to the Constitution Bench judgment of the Apex Court rendered in the case of K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of Indiai, held that Chapter-37 of the A.P. Police Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders on the basis of which the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/histor^-sheets are being opened and surveillance is being kept on the individuals on the basis of the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets , as

¶818

void. At para.45 of the said common order, it is held as follows: ‘45) Hence, the Writ Petition No..3568 of 2022 is allowed declaring the Standing Orders of .A.P. Police Manual / A.P. Police Standing Orders to the extent of opening/continuation

¶819

(2017) 10 se e 1

¶820

3 CMR, J. W.P.No.4990 of 2016 & Batch

¶821

of Rowdy Sheet, Suspect Sheet, History Sheet etc., and on that basis the surveillance of the individual (in -terms of Chapter 37 of the above said Standing Orders) as void. All the other Writ Petitions are also allowed. All the rowdy sheets opened in this batch of Writ Petitions are directed to be closed immediately. The police cannot open or continue a rowdy sheet or collect data pertaining to a person without the sanction of law”. Collection of personal data amd its usage for prevention of crimes also can only be in accordance with a law'’ which crosses the thresholds mentioned in the Constitution of India and the various judgments including K.S.Puttaswamy case (2 supra) since ‘privacy’ is now a Fundamental Right as per PartIll of the Constitution of India. It is reiterated that the police cannot (under the existing orders) indulge in night visits; domiciliary visits to the houses of a suspect or accused. They cannot take or demand the photographs, fingerprints etc., except under the procedure established by a ‘law’ and if the conditions laid down are satisfied. Accused or suspects cannot be summoned or called to the Police Station or an3rwhere else either during festivals/elections/weekends etc. They cannot be made to wait at the Police Stations for any reason or seek permission to leave the local jurisdiction.”

¶822

¶823

Therefore, as the very Chapter-37 in the A.P. Police^Manual and A.P. Police Standing Orders, on the basis of which all the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets are opened and suiweillance is being kept on the petitioners on the basis of the V. said the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets and the ssme are being continued, is now declared as void, the opening of the said the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets against the petitioners and continuing the same is clearly^{unsustainable} under law. They have no legal sanctity and they cannot be sustained under law and they cannot be allowed to be in force and continued any longer.

¶824

CMR, J. W.P.No.4990 of 2016 & Batch

¶825

Therefore, in view of the aforesaid common order, dated 15.07.2022, of this Court and for the reasons stated therein, these Writ Petitions are allowed declaring the opening of the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheetts/ hi s tory- sh eets against the petitioners, which are all impugned in these Writ Petitions, as illegal and unconstitutional, Consequently, all the ro wdj'-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets. opened against the petitioners in these Writ Petitions, stand closed forthwith. The respondents in all these Writ Petitions' are directed to close the the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/histoiy-sheets in their records which are opened against the petitioners. No surveillance shall be kept on the petitioners herein on the basis of the said the rowdysheets/.suspect-sheets/history-sheets and the petitioners shall not be called to the Police Station in connection with any such rowdy-sheets/su.spect-sheets/histor>'--sheets. which are now declared as illegal and unconstitutional and which are closed. No costs.

¶826

Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any.

¶827

shall also stand closed.

¶828

¶829

//TRUE COPY//

¶830

Sd/- P.VENKATA RAMANA JOINT REGISTRAR N OFFICER

¶831

¶832

Mr. Vali Basha, S/o not known to petitioner Sub Inspector of Poiice (51-2823), Guntakal II Town Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District. 2. Mr.Vasadi Syamalarao, S/o Satya Rao Aged about 30 years, R/o. D.No.8-4-9, Kotniveedhi, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District. 3. Sri. S. Tata Rao, Inspector of police. Worked as SHO in Anakapalli Town PS, (In elections period year 2019) Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam^Dist 4. Sri. S. Tata Rao, Inspector of poiice. Worked as SHO In Anakapalli I own PS, (In elections period year 2019) Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam^District. 5. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶833

The Sub-Inspector of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Guduru Police Station, Kurnool District Andhra Pradesh.

¶834

/. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Anantapuram. 8. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Guntur West,^Guntur 9. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban District,^Guntur. 10. The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa^District. 11. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District at Kurnool. 12. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh. 13. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, Ongole. 14. The Superintendent of Police, Rajamahendravaram Urban Police District, Rajamahendravaram

¶835

533 103, East Godavari District

¶836

IS. The Additional Superintendent of Police, Ongole,^{PrakasamDistrict.} 16. The Asodi Srinivasa Reddy, Sub Inspector of Police, Presently attached to Sub Divisional Police Officer, North Sub-Division, Guntur Urban, Guntur District, AP

¶837

The Assistant Commissioner of Police Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, A.P,

¶838

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Madhurawada Sub-Division, Visakhapatnam. 19. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, West Zone, Vijayawada Krishna District. 20. The Circle Inspector of Police, Peddapuram, East^{GodavariDistrict.} 21. The Circle Inspector, Panyam Village, Kurnool District,^A.P. 22. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, A.P.

¶839

The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam. 24. The Deputy General of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh. 2b. The Deputy Sub-Divisional Police Officer, (South), Guntur Urban, Guntur District. 26. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Adoni, Kunroot District, Andhra Pradesh. 27. the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jangareddygudem^{DivisionWestGodavariDistrict.} 28. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kakinada,^{EastGodavariDistrict.} 29. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandyal, Kurnool District, A.P. 30. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Proddutur, YSR Kadapa District. 31. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ramachandrapuram,^{EastGodavariDistrict.} 32. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Women Police Station, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. 33. The Deputy Superintendent of Police/Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kasibuqqa, Srikakulam District.

¶840

The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Kolanukonda, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 35. The Divisional Superintendent of Police, Guntur North, Guntur District.

¶841

The Dy. SP/ Sub Divisional Police Officer (SDPO), Anakapalalli Sub-Division Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam

¶842

The Dy. Superintendent of Police, Chirala, Prakasam^District. 38. The he Deputy Superintendent of Police, South Zone, Rajamahendravaram Urban Police District, Rajamahendravaram - 533 103, East Godavari^District

¶843

The Inspector of Police, Araku Valley, Visakhapatnam^District.

¶844

The Inspector of Police, Chirala, Prakasam District

¶845

The Inspector of Police, Ichapuram, Srikakulam^District.

¶846

The Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Bhimavaram, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶847

The Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam

¶848

The Inspector of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur District,^A.P.

¶849

The Inspector of Police, P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶850

¶851

46. The Inspector of Police, Po	dili Circle, Podili, ^{Prakasam District.}
47. The SHO, Adoni Taluka Pol 48. The SHO, Bikkavolu PS, Ea	ice Station, Kurnool District, ^{Andhra Pradesh.} st Godavari District.
49.TheSHO,BommuruPS,R	jamahendravaramUrban,East ^{Godavari District.}
50.TheSIofPolice,Ichapura	mRuralPS,Srikakulam^District.
51.TheStationHouseOffice,	Mydukur(U/G)PoliceStationMydukur,YSRKadapaDistrict.
52. The Station House Office,	Urban P.S., Chilakaturipet, GunturDistrictRep.byitsInspectorof
Police
53. The Station House Officer,	Airport Police Station, Visakhapatnam.
54. The Station House Officer,	Ambajipeta Police Station, East Godavari District.
55. The Station House officer,	Anakapalli Town PS, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam Dist.
56. The Station House Officer,	Biccavolu Police Station, Biccavolu, East Godavari District
57. The Station House Officer,	Bobbili Police Station, Vizianagaram District.
58.The.StationHouseOfficer,	BuchireddipalemMandal, ^{SPSR Nellore District}
59. The Station House Officer,	C-Belagal Police Station, C-Belagal, Kurnool District.
60.TheStationHouseOfficer,	ChebroluPoliceStation, ^{Guntur District.}
61. The Station House Officer,	Chintalapudi West Godavari ^District.
62.TheStationHouseOfficer,	DowlaiswaramP.S.,Dowlaiswaram -533125,EastGodavari
District
63.TheStationHouseOfficer,	DumbrigudaPolicestation,VisakhapatnamDistrict
64. The Station House Officer, A.P.	Gadivemula Police Station, Gadivemula Mandal, Kurnool District,
65. The Station House Officer,	Gollaprolu, East Godavari District,A.P.
66. The Station House Officer,	Guntakal II Town Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District.
67.TheStationHouseOfficer,	GuntakalRuralPoliceStation,Guntakal,AnantapurDistrict.
68. The Station House Officer,	ITown PS, Anantapuram Town and District.
69.TheStationHouseOfficer,	IITownPoliceStation,Bhimavaram,W.G.District,Andhra
Pradesh.
70.TheStationHouseOfficer,	IITownPoliceStation, Srikakulam District.
71. The Station House Officer,	II Town Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
72. The Station House Officer,	II Town PS, Anantapuram ^{Town and District.}
73. The Station House Officer,	IV Town Police Station, ^Nellore.
74. The Station House Officer,	J.R Puram Police Station Srikakulam District.
75. The Station House Officer,	Mangalagiri Rural Police Station,Mangalagiri,GunturDistrict,AP
76. The Station House Officer,	Naguluppalapadu Police Station, Naguluppalapadu, Prakasam Dist
77.TheStationHouseOfficer,	P.M.PalemPoliceStation,Visakhapatnam,VisakhapatnamDistrict.
78. The Station House Officer,	Palakol Town, Palakol, ^{West Godavari District.}
79.TheStationHouseOfficer,	PamulapaduPoliceStation,KurnoolDistrict,AndhraPradesh
80. The Station House Officer,	Pattabhipuram Police Station, Pattabhipuram, Guntur.
81.TheStationHouseOfficer,	PedaKakaniPoliceStation,PedaKakni,GunturDistrict.
82. The Station House Officer,	Podili Police Station, Podili, Prakasam District.
83. The Station House Officer,	Putlur P.S Anantapuramu ^District.
84. The Station House Officer,	Tadikonda Police Station, Tadikonda,GunturDistrict.
85. The Station House Officer,	Tadipatri Town P.S. Anantapuramu District
86. The Station House Officer,	Therlam Police Station. VizianagaramDistrict.
87. The Station House Officer,	V.Satram Police Station, Venkatachalam, SPSR Nellore District.
88. The Station House Officer, 89. The Station House Officer,	Vetapalem, Prakasam ^District Yellanur PS, Anantapuramu ^District.
90.TheStationHouseOfficer,	YemmiganurTownPoliceStation,Yemmiganur,KurnoolDistrict
91. The Station House Officer,	Yerraguntia Police Station, Kadapa District.
92.TheSubDivisionalPoliceO	ficer(D.S.P),Peddapuram,EastGodavariDistrict,
93. The Sub Divisional Police Of	ficer, Guntakal, Anantapur ^District
94.TheSubDivisionalPoliceO	ficer,Kandukur,Prakasam^District.
95. The Sub Divisional Police Of	ficer, Nellore Rural, ^{SPSR Nellore District.}
96.TheSubDivisionalPoliceO	ficer,NorthSub-Division,GunturUrban,GunturDistrict,AP
97. The Sub Divisional Police Of 98.TheSubDivisionalPoliceO	ficer, Srikakulam, ^{Srikakulam District.} ficer-cum-DeputySuperintendentofPolice,Darsi,Prakasam
District.
99.TheSubDivisionalPoliceS	ationOfficer,AmalpuramSubDivision,EastGodavriDistrict.
100.TheSubinspectorofPolice	,/StationHouseOfficer,KanigiriPoliceStation,Kaniqiri,Prakasam
District.
101. The Sub Inspector of Police 102.TheSubInspectorofPolic	, Guntakal II Town Police Station, Guntakal, Anantapur District ,JammalamaduguUrban
YSRKadapaDistrict.	Police Station, Jammalamaduqu Town ^

¶852

¶853

10-3. The Sub Inspector of PoHce, Uravakonda Police Station, Uravakonda, Ananthapur District,
Andhra Pradesh.
104. The Sub inspector of Police/Station House Officer, VajrapukothuruPofice Station,
Vajrapukotturu Mandal Srikakulam District.
IDS. The Sub. Divisional Police Officer, Narsapur, Sub.Division, Narsapur, W.G.District, AP.
106. The Sub.Divisional Police Officer, Palamaner, Chittoor District, AP
107. The Sub.Inspector of Police, Chowdepalle Police Station Chowdepalle, Chittoor District Andhra
Pradesh
108. The Sub-Divisbnal Police Officer, Anantapuram,
109. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Bobbili Sub-Division, Vizianagaram District.
110. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Guntur Urban District, Guntur.
111. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Jammalamadugu Division, Jammalamaduqu, YSR Kadapa
District
112. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kadapa, Kadapa District.
113. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
114. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kasibugga, Srikakulam District.
115. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nellore Town Sub-Division, Nellore
116. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Ramachandrapuram Sub-Division, Ramachandrapuram, East
Godavari District.
117. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Srikakulam Sub-Division, Srikakulam District.
118. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Tadipatri Division, Anantapuram District, Andhra Pradesh.
119. The Sub-Inspector of Police (S.H.O), Peddapuram Police Station, Jaggampeta, East Godavari
District.
120. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Pedapudi Police Station, East Godavari District.
121. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Pedapudi Police Station, East Godavari District.
122. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapur, Anantapur District
123. The Superintendent of Police, (Urban), Guntur District, A.P.
124. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District, At Kakikanda, A.P.
125. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District at Guntur.
126. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, at Ongole.
127. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam District.
128. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural
129. The Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram District.
130. The Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District, At Eluru.
131. The Superintendent, of Chittoor District, Chittoor A.P.
132.The Station House Officer, Midthur Police Station Midthur, Kurnool District.
133. One CC to Sri Butta Vijaya Bhasker, Advocate [OPUC]
134. One CC to SRI. BATHULA RAJ KIRAN Advocate [OPUC]
135. One CC to SRI. M CHALAPATHI Advocate [OPUC]
136. One CC to SRI. VENKATESWARLU KOLLA Advocate [OPUC]
137. One CC to SRI. M P V N V SASTRI Advocate [OPUC]
138. One CC to SRI. CH MARKONDAIAH Advocate [OPUC]
139. One CC to SRI. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
140. One CC to SRI. K MUNI REDDY BALA PRASAD Advocate [OPUC]
141. One CC to SRI. RAMESH BABU PEDAPALLI Advocate [OPUC]
142. One CC to SRI. P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR Advocate [OPUC]
143. One CC to SRI. SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI Advocate [OPUC]
144. One CC to SRI. D KODANDARAMI REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
145. One CC to SRI. KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR Advocate [OPUC]
146. One CC to SRI. N SRIHARI Advocate [OPUC]
147. One CC to SRI. SARATH KUMAR D Advocate [OPUC]
148. One CC to SRI. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Advocate [OPUC]
149. One CC to SRI. P GANGA RAMI REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
150. One CC to SRI. VENKATA REDDY CHITTEM Advocate [OPUC]
151. One CC to SRI. P NAGENDRA REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
152. One CC to SRI. K SRINIVASA PRASAD Advocate [OPUC]
153. One CC to SRI. J U M V PRASAD Advocate [OPUC]
154. One CC to SRI. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Advocate [OPUC]
155. One CC to SRI. HAMSA DEVINENI Advocate [OPUC]
156. One CC to SRI. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATT Advocate [OPUC]
157. One CC to SRI. Y BALAJI Advocate [OPUC]
158. One CC to SRI. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
159. One CC to SRI. V VINOD K REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
160. One CC to SRI. ATCHUTANANDA DONDETI Advocate [OPl ICJ
161, One CC to SRI. PATAN MOHAN MEDIDA Advocate [OPUr]

¶854

¶855

One CC to SRI. S BALA MOHAN RAO Advocate [OPUC} 163. One CC to SRI. N SIVA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 164. One CC to SRI. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Advocate [OPUC] 165. One CC to SRI. HARISH KUMAR RASINENI Advocate [OPUC] 166. One CC to SRI. P R K AMERANDRA KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 167. One CC to SRI. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Advocate [OPUC] 168. One CC to SRI. T.V.JAGGI REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 169. OneCCto SRI. SRINIVAS AMBAIT Advocate [OPUC] 170. One CC to SRI. V NITESH Advocate [OPUC] 171. OneCCto SRI. K CHIDAMBARAM Advocate [OPUC] 172. One CC to SRI. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Advocate [OPUC] 173. One CC to SRI. BOKKA SATYANARAYANA Advocate [OPUC] 174. One CC to SRI. K B RAMANNA DORA Advocate [OPUC] 175. One CC to SRI. P NARAHARJ BABU Advocate [OPUC] 176. One CC to SRI. RAMA MOHAN PALANKI Advocate [OPUC] 177. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 178. Two CD Copies

¶856

RAM

¶857

Note: The typographical mistake in incorporating the^{caseWP.No.l7439of2021} in batch cases is rectified. Substitute this amended order in place of earlier order which was dispatched on 16-09-2022.

¶858

Sd/- E.KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR

HIGH COURT

DATED:01/08/2022

AMENDED COMMON ORDER

WRIT PETITION Nos: 4990. 14611. 18284. 28889 of 2016; 3182 of 2018: 4204, 10545, 11948, 12035, 17227, 19568. 19756, 20775 of 2019:560, 620, 22541, 24449, 25428 of 2020; 317. 787. 3169, 8207, 8516, 11009, 11844, 12911. 16844, 17414, 17439,17658, 18037. 18172, 18187, 19025, 20048, 20455. 20946, 26749, 29372 of 2021; 993. 3223, 3283. 4340, 6743, 6753, 7284, 7525. 7652. 8911, 11073, 11081, 11167. 11169. 11170, 11171, 11442, 18696, 23516. 23526 and 23541 of 2022.

¶864

0 ‘I FEB 2025 ^
Current Section . ^

¶865

ALLOWING THE ALL WP's WITHOUT COSTS

Vaddeboina Venkata Krishna Reddy at Nellore Kirshna Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vaddeboina Venkata Krishna Reddy at Nellore Kirshna Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yarra Raju Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Pasila Suresh at Suresh Kumar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

P. N. Balaji alias Arun, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Gorle Sekhar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Amarpalli Krishnaji Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Chennu Chanti Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh