Disposed

K C Linga Reddy v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC1 Nov 2022WP/31050/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition regarding non-payment of Rs.30.76 lakhs dues for completed desilting works, the Court directed respondent authorities to complete verification within three weeks and pay the due amount within six weeks. The Court clarified that payment must be made immediately if verification is not completed by the deadline.

What did the court decide?

Direction to complete verification within three weeks; thereafter, pay the due amount within six weeks. Immediate payment mandated if verification delayed.

K C Linga Reddy Vs the State of Ap — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Andhra Pradesh HC (2022)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.31050 of 2022

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

The petitioner had been awarded various contracts for taking up the “Neeru-Chettu” programme for De-silting of Chittelanka vagu G.C Palem (V) in Bandiatmakur (M), Kurnool District and various other works, under various agreements. After execution of the said works, a final bill for Rs.30,76,324/- had been prepared and submitted to the concerned for payment. As the payment of the said amount has not been made by the respondents, the petitioner had approached this Court, by way of this writ petition.

¶5

It is the contention of the petitioner that even though the respondents admitted that the petitioner is entitled for payment of the aforesaid sum of money, no payment is being made. The petitioner contends that such non-payment of money is clearly arbitrary and high-handed requiring the interference of this Court.

¶6

This Court, in various orders, including the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated

¶7

¶8

05.10.2021 in W.P.No.10038 of 2021 and batch had taken the view that such non-payment of dues is arbitrary and that such dues need to be cleared by the respondents at the earliest.

¶9

The learned Government Pleader submits that the respondent authorities are verifying the claims of the petitioner and would be in a position to make payment only after such verification is completed.

¶10

In view of the aforesaid directions of this Court in various cases and after hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Irrigation, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to complete the verification process within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter to pay the amount due to the petitioner depending upon the outcome of the verification, within a period of six weeks. It is clarified that in the event of the verification process not being completed within the aforesaid period of three weeks, the respondents shall pay the amount due to the petitioner, without insisting upon any further time for verification. It

¶11

¶12

would also be open to the petitioner to agitate his/her/their claim for interest, if any payable by the respondents, in an appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶13

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any,

¶14

shall stand closed.

¶15

____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

¶16

01.11.2022 MJA

¶17

¶18

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶19

WRIT PETITION No.31050 of 2022

¶20

01.11.2022

¶21

MJA

K C Linga Reddy v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K C Linga Reddy v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bellamkonda Raviteja, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh (Sabbavaram Police Station)

Prakhya Nataraj Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Golla Surendra Kumar Vs the State of Andhra Prdesh

S.Anitha Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

P. Sudheer Kumar Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Y.Kumari Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh