The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati Bench disposed of three writ petitions challenging the Sub Registrar's action in not registering sale deeds. The court held the petitions infructuous and dismissed them.
No order passed on the prayer to register documents; proceedings closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION Nos: 28155. 25121 and 28272 OF 2015
WRIT PETITION NO: 28155 OF 2015
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2^^ respondent in not registering the document sought to be presented by the petitioner with respect to the property with house western side of half of the portion of the Plot No. 92, admeasuring 122.22 sq. yards in Sy No. 317/1, LP No.10/82, Parimala Nagar, Kallur Village and Mandal, Kurnool District in favour of the
K''
third parties as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2"'^ respondent to entertain and register the sale deed presented by the petitioner with respect of the above property.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 36529 OF
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances slated m the affidavit fiied in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2"“ respondent to register the document presented by petitioner with respect to the property with house western side of half of the portion of the Plot No. 92 admeasuring 122.22 sq. yards in Sy No. 317/1, LP No, 10/82, Parimala Nagar, Kallur Village and Mandal, Kurnool District forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI C. RAMA SUBBA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : GP FOR STAMSP & REGISTRATION
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI SHAIK MOHAMMAD (SC FOR AP WAKF BOARD)
WRIT PETITION NO: 25121 OF 7(\iR
Between:
H NO. 76/93-B2
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2 nd respondent in not registering the document sought to be presented by the petitioner with respect to the property with eastern and western side i.e, 20 feet and 30*'" feet of house bearing Plot No.56 admeasuring 133.33 sq. yards in Sy No.320/1 situated at Parimala Nagar, Kallur Village and Mandal, Kurnool District through my vendors by way of Regd Sale Deed vide Doc No. 2884/2011 in favour of the third parties as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2""^ respondent to entertain and register the sale deed presented by the petitioner with respect of the above property.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 32602 OF 20151
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2"^^ respondent to register the document presented by petitioner with respect to the property with eastern and western side i ..e 20 feet and 30th feet of house bearing Plot No,56 admeasuring133.33 sq. yards in Sy No.320/1 situated at Parimala Nagar, Kallur Village and Mandal, Kurnool District through my vendors by way of Regd Sale Deed vide Doc No. 2884/2011 forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI C. RAMA SUBBA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : GP FOR STAMSP & REGISTRATION
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI SHAIK MOHAMMAD (SC FOR AP WAKF BOARD)
WRIT PETITION NO: 28272 OF 2015
Between:
Subbanna, Aged 39 Years R/o. H No. 76/97-174-5, Weaker Section Colony Kurnool City, Kurnool District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2"^ respondent in not registering the document sought to be presented by the petitioner with respect to the property with house bearing Plot No. 52, admeasuring 253 .33 sq. yards in Sy No. 320/1, LP No. 10/82 of 76^ ward of Kallur Village and Mandal, Kurnool District m favour of the third parties as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2"r respondent to entertain and register the sale deed presented by the petitioner with respect of the above property.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 36654 OF 20151
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased, to direct the 2"'^ respondent to register the document presented
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION Nos.28155. 25121 and 28272 of 2015
COMMON ORDER;
At the time when these matters are taken up for hearing, Sri C. Rama Subbareddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, represents that this Writ Petition has become infructuous.
The statement of the learned counsel for the petitionersis placed on record.
Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if anyinthe Writ Petitions, shall stand closed.
To.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR § SECTION OFFICER
Cnr
HIGH COURT
DATED:02/12/2022
COMMON ORDER
WP.No.28155, 25121 and 28272 of 2015
O?
tn i
0 6 MAR 20?5 C/j ?
. Currsni Section
■'v
DISMISSING THE W.Ps AS INFRUCUTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
E. Koulutlaiah Goud & Anr. etc.
Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh
Sub Registrar, Stamps & Registration, Kallur
Tahsildar, Kallur
AP State Wakf Board
V. SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
