Writ petition dismissed for default as no representation appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION NO.26564 OF 2017
ORDER :
When the matter is taken up for hearing on 18.02.2022, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the
caption “for dismissal” on 02.03.2022.
Even today when the matter is called, there is no
representation on behalf of the petitioner at 11:44 AM.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for default. There
shall be no order as to costs of the Writ Petition.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 02.03.2022
PGT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION NO.26564 OF 2017
Date: 02.03.2022
PGT
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
