Allowed

Nusam Ramana Reddy, v. The State of A.P. rep. its Principal Secretary

Andhra Pradesh HC22 Jul 2022WP/22630/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Police rowdy-sheets, suspect-sheets and history-sheets opened under Chapter-37 were declared illegal and unconstitutional. Following an earlier common order, the Court allowed the petitions, ordered immediate closure of the sheets, and prohibited surveillance or police-station summons based on them, without examining individual merits.

What did the court decide?

All impugned rowdy-sheets, suspect-sheets and history-sheets closed forthwith; police directed to close their records and cease surveillance and summons based on those sheets.

Nusam Ramana Reddy, Vs The State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Andhra Pradesh HC (2022)

¶1

• ^

¶2

■y
d:
-O'
z>
! X)
M
qVv
•r--j

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)’

¶4

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TW'^V, PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

¶5

WRIT PETITION No: 3589S of

¶6

Between:

¶7

Kffiap„?am"Mand"ali'p°SRSore"SS^^^^^^ "sed about 51 years, Gottigundala Palem Village, ...Petitioner AND i- Hyderabad. 5. The Station House Officer, Kondapuram Police Station, Kondapuram, S.P.S^R.Nellore District. ...Respondents

¶8

gmsmsmmm ssmmmmmmys!

¶9

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014rWPMP. NO: 44922 OF 2014^

¶10

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PAVULURI SREENIVASULUZ. Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO: IIQQQ r>F

¶12

Between: Sn"e,7B"H^S?S,d=^Jn^u^:S^„tSrDistrS «/° H.N0.16.5-S4, Pits, ...Petitioner '' HyLSld”*^ Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its^Pri^dpal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, i: Se' §K?1sur7^?„7pTrurr7ltrS"'^“^="-

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

226 of the Constitution stated m the affidavit filed therewith, Up u.u praying that in the circumstances appropriate writ or direction rrhcT pleased to issue any other more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring

¶15

¶16

call the petitioner to the police station for signing in the register, pending disposal of the above

¶17

i writ petition.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DHANA LAKSHMI TALLAPALEM

¶19

, Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶20

WRIT PETITION NO: llOll OF 2016

¶21

Between: Gaddam Manikya Rao, S/o Gaddam Mohan Rao, Occ: Labour, R/o H.No.16-6-16, Christian Peta Old Guntur, Guntur District ' L ...Petitioner

¶22

AND

¶23

^ St^e of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, iiycj0r9D3Q. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad Commissionerate, Hyderabad. 3. The Station House Officer, Guntur - Town P.S, Guntur District.

¶24

...Respondents

¶25

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any other appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioners as illegal arbitrary and violative of Article 14, Article 19 (1) (e) and Article 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet against the petitioner.

¶26

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 13886 OF 20161

¶27

¶28

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DHANA LAKSHMI TALLAPALEM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶29

WRIT PETITION NO: 161 OF 2017

¶30

Between:

¶31

Yarlagadda Srinivasa Rao S/o Subba Rao aged 54 years Occ: Business R/o Makavaripalem, H/o Pagolu(v) Challapalli(M) Krishna District. ...Petitioner

¶32

AND

¶33

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District, at Vijayawada. 3. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 4. The Inspector of Police, P.S. Challapalli, Krishna^District.

¶34

...Respondents

¶35

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent nos.3 and 4 in registering Rowdy sheet no.336/14 dt. 15-5-2014 vide C.no.63/SDP0A/14as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the said proceedings and grant. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 176 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of proceedings no.336/14 dt.15-5- 2014 vide C.no.63/SDPOA/14 registered by the respondent nos. 3 and 4 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME WRIT PETITION NO: 1672 OF 2017 Between: 1. Gurajala Venkateswara Rao, S/o.Peddiraju, aged about 52 years Occ: Agricultural cooli R/o.Bommuluru-(V), Gudivada Rural -(M) Krishna Distsrict,^A.P. 2. Madapati Jaganmohana Rao, Jagan , S/o.Nageswara Rao, Aged about 52 years OccAgricultural cooli, R/o.Bommuluru-(V), Gudivada Rural -(M) Krishna Distsrict, A.P.

¶36

...Petitioners

¶37

AND

¶38

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Secretary-Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Velagapudi, A.P.

¶39

The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District, Machilipatnam. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gudivada, Krishna District,

¶40

The Station House Officer, Gudivada Taluk Police Station, Gudivada, Krishna District.

¶41

...Respondents

¶42

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction, more, particularly a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, opening rowdy sheet against the petitioners by the respondents as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Article 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the Rowdy sheet against the petitioners.

¶43

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 1911 OF 20171

¶44

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the respondents 2 to 4, Not to ask the petitioners to attend the police station,^henceforth.

¶45

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI Y.KOTESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶46

WRIT PETITION NO: 1918 OF 2017

¶47

Between:

¶48

Kokkiligadda Vasantha Rao, S/o. Vasantha Rao, aged about 30 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Kothapalem Village, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District.

¶49

Chennu Srinivas Rao, S/o. Harichandrudu, aged about 30 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Kothapalem Village, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District.

¶50

Kokkiligadda Veera Raju, S/o. Harichandrudu, aged about 32 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Kothapalem Village, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District.

¶51

Kokkiligadda Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Peda Ankaiah, aged about 31 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Kothapalem Village, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur^District.

¶52

Pedasingu Suklacharyudu, S/o. Venkataswamy, aged about 34 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Kothapalem Village, Nizampatnam Mandal, Guntur District ...Petitioners

¶53

AND

¶54

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶55

The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Rural, Guntur,^{GunturDistrict.} 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bapatia Sub-Division, Bapatia, Guntur District 4. The Station House Officer, Adavuladeevi Police Station,^{GunturDistrict.}

...Respondents

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 2203 OF 20171

¶61

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may_ be pleased tP direct the Respondents not to harass the petitioners.

¶62

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B S N NAIDU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶63

WRIT PETITION NO: 2570 OF 2017

¶64

Between:

¶65

Nallamilli Radha Krishna Reddy @ Gopalam, S/o. Subba Rama Reddy, Hindu, Aged about 60 years. Occ: Retd. Employee, R/o. Rayavaram Village, Anaparthy Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Petitioner

¶66

¶67

Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal, Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat

¶68

Building, Amaravati at Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶69

1. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District,^atKakinada. 3. The Station House Officer, Rayavaram Police Station, Rayavaram, East Godavari District.

¶70

...Respondents

¶71

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents herein particularly Respondent No. 3 in opening rowdy sheet and affixing the petitioner's photos in the notice board of the Rayavaram Police Station and calling upon the petitioner to the Rayavaram Police Station regularly without pendency of any crime against the petitioner as nothing but illegal, arbitrary, erroneous, high handed and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the rowdy sheet further directing the Respondents herein not to interfere with the petitioner's personal life and liberty guaranteed under the Constitution of India.

¶72

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 3014 OF 2017^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents particularly Respondent No.3 not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner under the guise of rowdy sheet pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶73

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A K KISHORE REDDY

¶74

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶75

WRIT PETITION NO: 3058 OF 2017

¶76

Between:

¶77

Gangula Narayana Reddy, S/o Styanarayana Reddy, aged 50 years, R/o Santhagudipadu Village, Rompecherla Mandal, Guntur District.

¶78

...Petitioner

¶79

AND

¶80

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Rural, Guntur,^{GunturDistrict} 3. The Inspector of Police, Rompecherla Police Station, Rompecherla, Guntur, Guntur Dist

¶81

...Respondents

¶82

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declare the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in failing to close the rowdy sheet No. 45/2015 opened against the petitioner on the file of the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of the provisions of Police Control Orders and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to forthwith close the rowdy sheet against the petitioner on the file of the 3'^ respondent.

¶83

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 3609 OF 2017'>

¶84

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station on the pretext of the rowdy sheet No. 45 of 2015 on the file of the 3"“rd respondent Pending disposal of the above writ petition of the above writ petition.

¶85

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶86

WRIT PETITION NO: 4155 OF 2017

¶87

Between:

¶88

P.P.C.Rao, S/o. Subba Rao, Hindu, aged about 34 years, R/o. 26-25-13, Durgivari Street, Gandhinagar, Vijayawada. ...Petitioner

¶89

AND

¶90

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada. 3. Assistant Commissioner of Police, West Zone, Vijayawada. 4. Station House Officer, II, Town Police Station, Vijayawada.

¶91

...Respondents

¶92

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening a Rowdy Sheet and retaining of the same vide proceedings of 3rd respondent

¶93

C.NO.27/HS/ACP-WZ/2014, dt.25.01.2017 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently call the records and set aside the same.

¶94

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 4986 OF 2017^

¶95

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings of 3 rd respondent vide C.No.27/HS/ACP-WZ/2014, dt.25.01.2017, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶96

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶97

WRIT PETITION NO: 4438 OF 2017

¶98

Between:

¶99

Guduri Radhakrishna, S/o late Adinarayana @ Adiyya, age about 45 years, Occ: Business, R/o Flat No.509, S.L.V.Mythri Towers, Ashramam Road, Kamujuvaripalem, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner

¶100

AND

¶101

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶102

The Divisional Police Officer-cum-Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District at Eluru. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Dy. Superintendant of Police, Narasapur Sub-Division, Narasapur, West Godavari District.

¶103

The Station House Officer, Palakoderu Police Station, Palakoderu, West Godavari District. 5. The Station House Officer, Bhimavaram I Town Police Station, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District.

¶104

...Respondents

¶105

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner vide H.S.No. 117/2016, dated 10-01-2016 of 4th respondent in pursuance to the proceedings of 3rd respondent 1016MdpO-N/2015, dated 17-112015, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the A.P.Police Standing orders, consequently direct the respondents to delete the petitioner's name from the rowdy sheet vide proceedings of 3 rd respondent 1016/ADPO-N/2015, dated 17-11-2015. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 5367 OF 2017j Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of proceedings of the 3^*^ respondent 1016/ADPO-N/2015, dated 17-11-2015, pending disposal of main Writ Petition. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 10227 OF 20173 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of WP.No.4438 of 2017 by fixing an early date.

¶106

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶107

WRIT PETITION NO: 5194 OF 2017

¶108

Between:

¶109

L V Mohan Reddy, S/o. Narasimha Reddy, aged about 48 years, Occ: Church Father, R/o.D.No.2-474, P.W. Colony, Back Side Ahobilampuram, Pulivendula Town and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ...Petitioner

¶110

AND

¶111

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶112

The Superintendent of Police, Y.S.R. Kadapa District, at Kadapa. 3. The Assistant Superintendent of Police, Pulivendula, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station; Khajipet, Y.S.R.Kadapa District. 5. The Station House Officer, Police Station; Pulivendula, Y.S.R. Kadapa District.

¶113

...Respondents

¶114

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or

¶115

direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the Respondents Nos. 2 to 5 in opening and maintaining the rowdy sheet, dated 13-7-2016, against the Petitioner in connection with the crime No. 54 of 2016, on the file of P.S. Khajipet, is illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 5 to delete the Petitioner's name from the rowdy sheet, dated 13-7-2016.

¶116

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 6322 OF 20171

¶117

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 5 not to insist the Petitioner’s presence in the police stations in connection with the rowdy sheet, dated 13-7-2017 maintained against the Petitioner, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.

¶118

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P BHAKTHAVATSAL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶119

WRIT PETITION NO: 5880 OF 2017

¶120

Between: R Posiprasad S/o Suryanarayana, Aged about 30 years, Occ: Driver, R/o D.No. 3-30, Janardhana Swamy temple street, Kadiyam Village and Mandal, East Godavari District.

¶121

...Petitioner

¶122

AND

¶123

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its PrI Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶124

The Superintendent of Police, Urban District, Raj^{amahendravaram} 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District 4. The Orcle Inspector of police (Station House, Officer), Kadiyam Police Station, Kadiayam East Godavari District.

¶125

The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kadiyam Police Station, Kadiyam, East Godavari District.

¶126

...Respondents

¶127

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing rowdy sheet vide No. 6 & of 2012, against the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also A p' Police Standing Order 601. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 7179 OF 20171 , Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4‘'’ respondent not to call the petitioner to the Police Station in connection with Rowdy Sheet No. 6 of 2012 pendinq disposal of the above Writ Petition.

¶128

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T V JAGGI REDDY

¶129

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶130

WRIT PETITION NO: 6432 OF 2017

¶131

Between:

¶132

Pothina Venkata Rao, S/o B.Apparao, age about 50 years, Occ: Car Driver, R/o D.No. 1-118 Pilaka Komativanipalem, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam ...Petitioner

¶133

AND

¶134

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam City, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Madhurawada Zone, Visakhapatnam. 4. The Station House Officer, P.M.Palem Police Station, Madhurawada, Visakhapatna m.

¶135

...Respondents

¶136

¶137

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 7865 OF 2017^

¶138

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner vide C.No.36/History sheet/ACPMWD/2011, dated 06-11-2011 and maintained in P.M.Palem P.S., Visakhapatnam city, pending disposal of the above writ petition, in the interest of justice.

¶139

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAJA GOPALA RAO HANUMANTHU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶140

WRIT PETITION NO: 7726 OF 2017

¶141

Between:

¶142

Pidugu Ravi @ Pasupuleti Ravi, S/o Subbaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Driver, R/o. Nehru Road, Proddatur, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. ...Petitioner

¶143

AND

¶144

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal, Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat

¶145

Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶146

The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, DGP Office, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

¶147

The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa^District. 4. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Proddatur Division, Proddatur, YSR Kadapa District. 5. The Circle Inspector of Police, Proddatur Rural, Proddatur Town, YSR Kadapa District. 6. The Sub Inspector of Police, Chapadu Police Station, Chapadu, YSR Kadapa District.

¶148

...Respondents

¶149

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the order passed by the 4th Respondent herein dated 24.09.2014 directing the 6th Respondent to open rowdy sheet against the Petitioner is arbitrary, illegal, malafide and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents herein to close the rowdy sheet, opened against the Petitioner and further direct not to interfere with the personal liberty of the Petitioner.

¶150

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 9524 OF 20171

¶151

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 5th Respondent herein not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station and insist the Petitioner to furnish photographs belonging to the Petitioner in pursuance of the Order passed by the 4‘^ Respondent dated 24.09.2014, pending disposal of the Writ Petition before this Honourable Court. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.DUSHYANTH REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶152

WRIT PETITION NO: 9276 OF 2017

¶153

Between:

¶154

Nagothi Appla Raju, S/o Late N. Peddi Appalaswamy, Occ: Contractor, 25-13, Kala Nagar, Kommadi, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam- 530048.

¶155

...Petitioner

¶156

AND

¶157

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District,^{AndhraPradesh.}

¶158

The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam City, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Madhurawada Zone, , Visakhapatnam. 4. The Station House Officer, P.M.Palem Police Station / t Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam. ...Respondents

¶159

¶160

¶161

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 11492 OF 2017^

¶162

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner C.No.21/History sheet/SLPO AKP/2007, dated 13-05-2007 and maintained in P.M.Palem P.S., Visakhapatnam city, pending disposal of the above writ petition, ii the interest of justice.

¶163

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAJ AND RAM LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶164

WRIT PETITION NO: 10342 OF 2017

¶165

Between:

¶166

Pallavolu Kishore Babu, S/o. Chinnaiah, Aged about 36 years , SC, Occ: Secondary Grade Teacher Kotareddy Nagar, Kandukur Town, Kandukur Mandal, Prakasam District. State of Andhra Pradesh ...Petitioner

¶167

AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh , Rep by its Prinicipal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi ( Capital City), Amaravathi, Amaravathi Mandal, Guntur District. 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Ongole town, Ongole Prakasam District 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ongole town, Ongole Prakasam District. 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station - Kandukur, Kandukur Town & Mandal, Prakasam District.

¶168

...Respondents

¶169

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ, Order Particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring the action of respondents in opening and continuing rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the police stations of 4th Respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Police Standing Orders and violative of Rights Guaranteed under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner in the 4^'’ Respondent police station.

¶170

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 12811 OF 2017’>

¶171

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 4^'" Respondent not to summon the petitioner to the Police Station of 4^'' Respondent Office without following due process of law pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶172

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH RAMAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶173

WRIT PETITION NO: 10948 OF 2017

¶174

Between:

¶175

Kureti Suresh, S/o.Venkata Puma Siva Rama Prasad (giSivaiah, Aged about 36 years, Occ: Business, Kuretivaripalem, R/o. Pedakallepalli village, Mopidevi Mandal, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner

¶176

AND

¶177

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Amaravathi. Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, Krishna^District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Avanigadda,^{KrishnaDistrict.} 4. The Inspector of Police, Challapalli P.S, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶178

...Respondents

¶179

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the Respondent No. 3 and 4 in registering the Rowdy sheet No. 283 dated 01-09-2009 as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unjustified, abuse of process of law and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and unsustainable and to Direct the Respondent No. 3 and 4 to close the Rowdy sheet No. 283 dated 01-09-2009.

¶180

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 13610 OF 2017^

¶181

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to suspend the operation of proceeding No. 283 dated 0109-2009 registered by the respondents No.3 and 4, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶182

■ ^

¶183

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMA RAO MAVIDI

¶184

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶185

¶186

WRIT PETITION NO: 13753 OF 2017

¶187

Between:

¶188

Kasireddy Nagendra Sree Harsha S/o. Madan Mohan Reddy, Occ:Freelance Journalist Cum RTI Activist, # R/o H.No 11-31-37/2, Pullareddy Nagar, Kavali Town, SPSR Nellore Dist. ...Petitioner

¶189

AND

¶190

The State of A.P, Rep by its Principle Secretary (Home), Secretariat, Valagapudi, Amaravathi Guntur District.

¶191

The Superintendent of Police, SPSR Nellore Dist.

¶192

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer Kavali, SPSR Nellore^Dist.

¶193

The Station house Officer, Kavali Town, SPSR Nellore^Dist.

¶194

...Respondents

¶195

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the action of 3 rd and 4*^ respondents by Opening a Rowdy Sheet No 196 On the File of SHO, Kavali I town P.S,Even though No criminal cases are pending as on the proceedings No.C.No.89/GLSDO.K/2015 Dt.14.09.2015 without jurisdiction, without following any procedure under statutes as illegal, arbitrary, high handness and against to the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 16, 19 (1) (g), 21, 300 A and 301 of the Constitution of India and consequently Quash the rowdy sheet No 196. on the File of SHO, Kavaii I town P.S.

¶196

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI JANARDHANA REDDY PONAKA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶197

WRIT PETITION NO: 15200 OF 2017

¶198

Between:

¶199

Kothala Veera Venkata Rama Kishore, S/o.Rama Rao, aged about 43 years, R/o.20-18-60, Thummalova, Raj amahendravaram. East Godavari District.

¶200

Koppada Rama Raju, S/o.Ramachandra Rao, aged about 57 years, R/o.59-15-4/3, P 86T Colony, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District. ...Petitioners

¶201

AND

¶202

¶203

The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat

¶204

Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh.

¶205

The Superintendent of Police, Rajamahendravaram Urban, Raj amahendravaram. East Godavari District.

¶206

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Central Zone, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District.

¶207

The Station House Officer, Rajamahendravaram III Town, Law 8i Order Police Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District.

¶208

...Respondents

¶209

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in opening Rowdy Sheet against the Petitioners and continue without closing the said Rowdy Sheet on the file of 4*^^ Respondent/ Station House Officer, Rajamahendravaram III Town Law 8i Order Police Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, against the principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the Respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet against the Petitioners.

¶210

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 18776 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet opened against the Petitioners on the file of 4'" Respondent/ Station House Officer, Rajamahendravaram III Town Law 8i Order Police Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶211

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B V RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶212

¶213

WRIT PETITION NO: 17404 OF 2017

¶214

Between:

¶215

Bellary Khader Basha, S/o. Tajuddin, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Private Service, R/o. H/No 2/99 Bharpet, Adoni, Kurnool District - 518 301. ' ...Petitioner

¶216

AND

¶217

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principle Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶218

The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad.

¶219

The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District.

¶220

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Dy.S.P, Near Govt. ESI Hospital, Adoni, Kurnool District - 518 301.

¶221

The Station House Officer, Adoni I Town Police Station,^Kurnool Dist.

¶222

The Station House Officer, Adoni II Town Police Station,^KurnoolDist.

¶223

The Station House Officer, Adoni III Town Police Station,^{KurnoolDistrict.}

¶224

...Respondents

¶225

¶226

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 21264 OF 20171

¶227

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner without following the due process of law and forbearing the respondent No, 5 to 7 not to use the finger prints. Photo graphs, I.D. proofs in the History sheet taken from the petitioner forcibly for maintenance of the Criminal Profile against petitioner and not to summon the petitioner frequently to the police station and detain them and threatened them.

¶228

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M A SHAKEEL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶229

WRIT PETITION NO: 18424 OF 2017

¶230

Between:

¶231

Nallamothu Veerababu, S/o.Thirupathaiah, aged about 30 years, R/o H.No. 33-57-187, Jayprakash Colony, Ongole, Prakasam District.

¶232

...Petitioner

¶233

AND

¶234

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District..

¶235

The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Station House Officer, Taluk Police Station, Ongole, Prakasam District.

¶236

...Respondents

¶237

¶238

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 22492 OF 20171

¶239

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the 3 rd respondent herein not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner herein in any manner, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.

¶240

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY

¶241

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶242

WRIT PETITION NO: 22592 OF 2017

¶243

Between:

¶244

Nusam Sree Ram Reddy, S/oo Pedda Narayanappa, Aged about 30 years, Occ: Agriculture, Residing at Dadithota Village, Tadimarri Mandai, Ananthapur^District.

¶245

...Petitioner

¶246

AND

¶247

The State of A.P., rep by its. Principal Secretary, Home Department, Velagapudi, Vijayawada. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapur District, Anantapur. 3. The Station House Officer, Tadimarri Police Station, Anantapur District.

¶248

...Respondents

¶249

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Direction or Order declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing rowdy sheet against the petitioner Tadimarri Police Station, Anantapur as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also ultra virus the Police Standing Order 742 consequently direct the respondents to close the history sheet maintained against the petitioner taken by the respondents.

¶250

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 27812 OF 2017^

¶251

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of further action of the respondents in pursuance of the rowdy sheet maintained against the petitioner in Tadimarri PS., Anantapur.

¶252

in the circumstances stated in the affidavit

¶253

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M KARIBASAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶254

WRIT PETITION NO: 22630 OF 2017

¶255

Between:

¶256

Nusam Ramana Reddy, S/o Pedda Narayanappa, Aged about 46 years, Occ: Agriculture, Residing at Dadithota Village, Tadimarri Mandai, Ananthapur District.

¶257

...Petitioner

¶258

AND

¶259

The State of A.P. rep. its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Velagapudi, Vijayawada. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapur District, Anantapur. 3. The Station House Officer, Tadimarri Police Station, Anantapur District.

¶260

...Respondents

¶261

¶262

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 27861 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of further action of the respondents in pursuance of the rowdy sheet maintained against the Petitioner in Tadimarri Police Station, Anantapur.

¶263

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.KARIBASAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶264

WRIT PETITION NO: 34335 OF 2017

¶265

Between:

¶266

Kunchepu Ravi Kumar @ Ravi, S/o Subbarayudu Aged about 30 years Occ: Vaddera R/o Mekala Balaya palli village, Yerraguntia mandai Kadapa District.

¶267

...Petitioner

¶268

¶269

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Development Velagapudi Amaravathi Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶270

1. the Superintendent of Police, Kadapa Dist. 3. The Asst. Superintendent of Police, Kadapa sub Division, Kadapa.

¶271

The Inspector of Police, Yerraguntla,Kadapa Dist. 5. The Sub Inspector of Police, Yerraguntia, Kadapa^Dist. 6. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kalamalla Police Station.

¶272

...Respondents

¶273

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 6 in opening rowdy sheet vide Rowdy No. 32 against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of AP police standing order 742 and contrary to the principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same by directing the respondents 3 to 6 to close the rowdy sheet vide rowdy No.32 against the petitioner in the interest of justice.

¶274

I.A. NO; 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 42694 OF 2017^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to 6 to close the rowdy sheet vide Rowdy No.32 opened against the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶275

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N PARAMESWARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶276

WRIT PETITION NO: 34446 OF 2017

¶277

Between:

¶278

Gorla Obulesu, S/o Obelusu Aged about 30 years R/o D.No. 7/5 Near Chinna gate, RTPP, Kalamalla village Yerraguntia mandal, Kadapa Dist.

¶279

...Petitioner AND

¶280

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi Guntur District Andhra Pradesh.

¶281

The Superintendent of Police Kadapa Dist. 3. The Asst. Superintendent of Police, Kadapa sub Division, Kadapa. 4. The Inspector of Police Yerraguntia, Kadapa Dist. 5. The Sub Inspector of Police Yerraguntia, Kadapa^Dist. 6. The Sub Inspector of Police Kalamalla Police Station.

¶282

...Respondents

¶283

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 6 in opening rowdy sheet No.243 and rowdy No.33 against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of AP police standing order 742 and contrary to the principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same by directing the respondents 3 to 6 to close the rowdy sheet No.234 and as well as rowdy No.33 against the petitioner in the interest of justice.

¶284

I.A. NO; 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 42831 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to 6 to close the rowdy sheet No.234 as well as Rowdy No.33 opened against the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶285

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.PARAMESWARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶286

WRIT PETITION NO; 35061 OF 2017

¶287

Between:

¶288

Gadwal Md.Esa, S/o Gadwal Abdul Sattar, Aged about 37 years, Occ.Business, R/o.H/No 2/234, Bharpet, Adoni, Kurnool District - 518 301. ...Petitioner

¶289

AND

¶290

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principle Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings. 2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad. 3. Superintendent of Police, .Kurnool Kurnool District. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Office, of the Dy.S.P, Near Govt. ESI Hospital Adoni, Kurnool District - 518 301 5. The Station House officer, Adoni I Town Police Station,^KurnoolDist. 6. The Station House officer, Adoni II Town Police Station, Kurnool Dist. TThe Station House officer, Adoni III Town Police Station, Kurnool Dist.

¶291

'13

¶292

The Station House officer, Adoni III Town Police Station, Kurnool Dist.

¶293

...Respondents

¶294

¶295

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 43569 OF 20171

¶296

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner without following the due process of law and forbearing the respondent No. 5 to 7 not to use the finger prints. Photo graphs, l.D. proofs in the History sheet taken from the petitioner forcibly for maintenance of the Criminal Profile against petitioner and not to summon the petitioner frequently to the police station and detain them and threatened them.

¶297

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M A SHAKEEL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶298

WRIT PETITION NO: 37968 OF 2017

¶299

Between:

¶300

Achanti Subramanyam, S/o Subba Rao, Aged 45 years, Occ: Unemployee R/o D.No. 20-93, Masjid Road, Pithanavari Veedi, Mogaltur Village, West Godavari^District.

¶301

...Petitioner

¶302

AND

¶303

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Home, Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, West Godavari^District.

¶304

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narsapur , West^{GodavariDistrict.} 4. The Station House Officer Mogaltur Police Station, Mogaltur, West Godavari District. 5. The Station Achanta Police Station, Achanta West Godavari District.

¶305

...Respondents

¶306

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 4 and 5 in not removing the petitioner name from the rowdy sheet which is declared upon the involvement of petitioner in crime No. 81 of 2001 on the file of 5th respondent PS, inspite of acquittal in the very same case as still mantainig the Rowdy sheet upon me is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and violative principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents No.4 and 5 forthwith remove the name of the petitioner from the rowdy sheet in the interest of justice.

¶307

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017rWPMP. NO: 47152 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents No.4 and 5 to remove the name of the petitioner from the rowdy sheet which forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶308

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PRUDHVI RAJ MUDUNURI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶309

WRIT PETITION NO: 41977 OF 2017

¶310

Between:

¶311

Desu prasanna Kumar, S/o. Desu Hanumantha Rao, Age: 31 years, Occ: Bussiness, R/o. D.No. 26-27-122, Ground Floor, 1st Lane main Road, A.T. Agraharam, Guntur.

¶312

Desu Srinivasu, S/o. Desu Hanumantha Rao, Age: 31 years, Occ: Bussiness, R/o. D.No. 2627-122, Ground Floor, 1st Lane main Road, A.T. Agraharam,^Guntur. ...Petitioners AND

¶313

The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal, Secretary, Home Department, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh.

¶314

The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban, Guntur^district.

¶315

The Inspector of Police, Nagarampalem circle, Guntur, Guntur District.

¶316

The Sub inspector of Police, Nagarampalem P.S., Guntur, Guntur^District.

¶317

¶318

Medisetty Rambabu, S/o. Late Pedda Veeraiah, Aged about: 43 years, Occ: Business, R/o. 26-27-122, 1st Floor, 1st Lane main Road, A.T. Agraharam,^Guntur.

¶319

...Respondents

¶320

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the respondent No. 2 to 4 interfering with life and liberty of the petitioners under threat of opening a rowdy sheet against the petitioners with vengeance and as a counter blast to the writ petition filed by the petitioners father in W.P. No. 36774 of 2017 questioning the highhanded action of the respondents no. 2 to 4 in collusion with and to aid the respondent no. 5 to evict the petitioners' father from the leased property of the respondent no. 5 though protected by the injunction orders against the respondent no. 5 in lA No. 119/2016 in Os No. 162/2016 dated 06.01.2017 on the file of the I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded, coupled with mala fides, for extraneous considerations, collusive and in violation of Art.14, 19 (1) (g) and Art.21 of Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice and fair play and may also.

¶321

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 52052 OF 2017J Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents more particularly Respondent No. 2 to 4 not to interfere with the petitioners and their family members life and liberty, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶322

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K RAMACHANDRA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶323

WRIT PETITION NO: 42140 OF 2017

¶324

Between: K. Kannan, S/o. K. Kuppa Swamy, Aged 40 years, R/o. D. No. 16-37, Koormayapuram, Newpet, Kuppam Town, Chittoor District. / k , ...Petitioner AND

¶325

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat

¶326

at Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶327

The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor District. 3. The Station House Officer, Kuppam Police Station,^{ChittoorDistrict.} 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kuppam Police Station, Chittoor District.

¶328

...Respondents

¶329

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3 rd and 4‘ respondents in opening the Rowdy Sheet No. 613 against the petitioner, on the file of P.S. Kuppam, as highly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet No. 613 against the petitioner, on the file of Kuppam Police Station, in the interest of justice.

¶330

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 52263 OF 2017J

¶331

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 herein not to call the petitioner to the Police Station in pursuance of the Rowdy Sheet No.613 opened against him on the file of Kuppam Police Station, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶332

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶333

WRIT PETITION NO: 42465 OF 2017

¶334

Between:

¶335

Katchaala Sankar, S/o Doraswamy, Aged about 39 years, Occu;Reporter, R/o Door No.26-42-207 Line, A.T Agraharam Guntur-4 ' ...Petitioner

¶336

AND

¶337

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶338

The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, West Division, Guntur Town, Guntur.

¶339

The Station House Officer, Pattabhipuram Police Station, Guntur Urban District.

¶340

...Respondents

¶341

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly In the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in calling to the Police Station 3 times in a week and making the Petitioner to stay in the Police Station for the most of the day only on the ground that a Rowdy Sheet is pending, without following due process of law since two months as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 4th Respondent not to interfere with the life and liberty of the Petitioner without following due process^oflaw.

¶342

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 52639 OF 7 Q17-> Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4^'’ Respondent not to interfere with the liberty of the Petitioner without following due process of law pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶343

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SYED KHADER MASTAN

¶344

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶345

WRIT PETITION NO: 42856 OF 2017

¶346

Between:

¶347

Peddapichigalla Gangadharam @ Ganga Raju, S/o. Nagaraja, aged about 26 years, occ; Working, As outsourcing employee at Sub Registrar Office, Kalikiri, Resident of Thota Street, Vayalpadu Town and Mandal, Chittoor District, A.P.

¶348

...Petitioner

¶349

AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh , Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor District. 3. The Station House Officer, Vayalpadu, Chittoor District. 4. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Madanapalle,^{ChittoorDistrict.} 5. K. Prakash, S/o. Late Reddappa, Police Constable -4302, Vayalpadu Police Station, Chittoor District.

¶350

...Respondents

¶351

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in opening rowdy sheet No. 697 by virtue of Proceedings No. C. No. 44/SDPO (M)/2017 dt. 17.02.2017 against the petitioner based on one crime alleged to have in Crime No. 2 of 2017 of PS Vayalpadu, Chittoor District, even though the petitioner is not the habitual offender not involved in any breach of peace and public tranquility and the same is being continued by extending the rowdy sheet without specifying any reason as arbitrary, illegal, violation of Part III of the Constitution of India as against the articles 14, 15, 21, 22, and paradox to Police Standing Orders No. 601 and 602 (1), and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the rowdy sheet No. 697 against the petitioner in the 3rd respondent police station in the interest of justice.

¶352

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 53155 OF 20171

¶353

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the rowdy sheet No. 697 against the petitioner in connection with Crime No.2 of 2017 on the file of 3"^ respondent police station, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.

¶354

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A P REDDY

¶355

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶356

WRIT PETITION NO: 42913 OF 2017

¶357

Between:

¶358

Medara Rama Murthy, S/o.Late Venkatramana, Occ: Private Employee, R/o.Ganqadoddi village Wo.Kuraparthy, Vayalpadu Mandal, Chittoor District,^A.P. ' ...Petitioner AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh , Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor District.

¶359

¶360

The Station House Officer, Vayalpadu, Chittoor District. 4. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Madanapalle, Chittoor, District. 5. K. Prakash S/o. Late Reddappa, Police Constable -4302, Vayalpadu Police Station, Chittoor District.

¶361

...Respondents

¶362

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in opening rowdy sheet No. 699 by virtue of Proceedings No. C. No. 44/SDPO (M)/2017 dt. 17.02.2017 against the petitioner based on one crime alleged to have in Crime NO. 2 of 2017 of PS Vayalpadu, Chittoor District, even though the petitioner is not the habitual offender not involved in any breach of peace and public tranquility and the same is being continued by extending the rowdy sheet without specifying any reason as arbitrary, illegal, violation of Part III of the Constitution of India as against the articles 14, 15, 21, 22, and paradox to Police Standing Orders No. 601 and 602 (1), and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the rowdy sheet No. 699 against the petitioner in the 3rd respondent police station in the interest of justice.

¶363

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO; 53220 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the rowdy sheet No. 699 against the petitioner in connection with Crime No.2 of 2017 on the file of 3^ respondent police station, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.

¶364

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A P REDDY

¶365

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶366

WRIT PETITION NO: 42917 OF 2017

¶367

Between:

¶368

Mayakunta Sreenath, S/o.Srinivasulu, aged about 22 years, Occ: student. Resident of Shivapura m village, Vayalpad Mandal, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner

¶369

AND

¶370

State of Andhra Pradesh , Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor District. 3. The Station House Officer, Vayalpadu, Chittoor District. 4. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Madanapalle,^{ChittoorDistrict.} 5. K. Prakash, S/o. Late Reddappa, Police Constable -4302, Vayalpadu Police Station, Chittoor District.

¶371

...Respondents

¶372

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in opening rowdy sheet No. 701 by virtue of Proceedings No. C. No. 44/SDPO (M)/2017 dt. 17.02.2017 against the petitioner based on one crime alleged to have in Crime NO. 2 of 2017 of PS Vayalpadu, Chittoor District, even though the petitioner is not the habitual offender not involved in any breach of peace and public tranquility and the same is being continued by extending the rowdy sheet without specifying any reason as arbitrary, illegal, violation of Part III of the Constitution of India, as against the articles 14, 15, 21, 22, and paradox to Police Standing Orders No. 601 and 602 (1), and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the rowdy sheet No. 701 against the petitioner in the 3^“ respondent police station in the interest of justice.

¶373

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 53225 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the rowdy sheet No. 701 against the petitioner in connection with Crime No.2 of 2017 on the file of 3'"'^ respondent police station, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.

¶374

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A P REDDY

¶375

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶376

WRIT PETITION NO; 42975 OF 2017

¶377

Between:

¶378

Medara Vinod, S/o.Late venkatramana. Aged about 26 years, Occ: Outsourcing Employee at Sub Registrar Office, Kalikiri, R/o.Thota Street, Vayalpad town and Mandal, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner

¶379

AND

¶380

State of Andhra Pradesh , Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶381

The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor District. 3. The Station House Officer, Vayalpadu, Chittoor District. 4. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Madanapalle,^{ChittoorDistrict.} 5. K. Prakash, S/o. Late Reddappa, Police Constable -4302, Vayalpadu Police Station, Chittoor District.

¶382

...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in opening rowdy sheet No. 698 by virtue of Proceedings No. C. No. 44/SDPO (M)/2017 dt. 17.02.2017 against the petitioner based on one crime alleged to have in Crime NO. 2 of 2017 of PS Vayalpadu, Chittoor District, even though the petitioner is not the habitual offender not involved in any breach of peace and public tranquility and the same is being continued by extending the rowdy sheet without specifying any reason as arbitrary, illegal, violation of Part III of the Constitution of India as against the articles 14, 15, 21, 22, and paradox to Police Standing Orders No. 601 and 602 (1), and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the rowdy sheet No. 698 against the petitioner in the 3rd respondent police station in the interest of justice.

¶383

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 53287 OF 2017^

¶384

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to close the rowdy sheet No. 698 against the petitioner^{inconnectionwithCrime} No.2 of 2017 on the file of 3'^'^ respondent police station, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.

¶385

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A P REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME ,

¶386

WRIT PETITION NO: 44416 OF 2017

¶387

Between:

¶388

Jujjavarapu Srihari, aged about 35 years, Occ.cultivation, R/o.D.No.2-64, Kongada Vari Veedhi, Pedapudi Village and Mandal, East Godavari Dist. ...Petitioner

¶389

AND

¶390

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶391

The Superintend of Police, East Godavari District, Kakinada, E.G.Dist. 3. The Duputy Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, East^{GodavariDistrict.} 4. The Station House Officer, Pedapudi Police Station, Pedapudi (V) and (M), East Godavari District.

¶392

...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner on the file of 4th respondent, on the pretext of sui-veillance even though the petitioner has not involved in any case after 2011 and acquitted in C.C.No.363 of 2014, as illegal, arbitrary unjust, discriminatory and also in violation of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and also contrary to the provisions of the Police Standing Orders and consequently direct the respondent to remove the name of the petitioner from the list of the Rowdy Sheet on the file of the 4'^ respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to summon the petitioner to the 4‘" respondent police station and interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner without there being any cau,se^orcase.

¶393

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.SRIHARI

¶394

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶395

WRIT PETITION NO: 11374 OF 2018

¶396

Between: Shaik Jakeer Hussain, S/o. Abdul Gafoor, Muslim, Aged about 41 years, R/o. Muslimpalem, Pedakakani Village and Mandal, Guntur District. (A.P). ...Petitioner

¶397

AND

¶398

Of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat

¶399

Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶400

1. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. Police Officer, North Sub-Division, Guntur Urban, Guntur District, Andhra

¶401

Hrau6Sn.

¶402

The Inspector of Police, Pedakakani Police Station, Pedakakani, Guntur District. Andhra Pradesh. House Officer, Pedakakani Police Station, Pedakakani, Guntur District. Andhra

¶403

Pradesh.

¶404

...Respondents

¶405

.. under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying^that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 3rd respondent in C.No.30/BCS/SDPO-North/GTR(U)/2017C.No.30/BCS/SDPO-North/GTRruV2ni7 dated on.2009-2017 and the consequential action of the 4th respondent in opening a rowdy sheet against the petitioner i" edakakarii Police station, Guntur District, as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper and violative of Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India and quite contrary to the A.P. Police Standing orders and violation of human rights and consequently direct the respondents to set-aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 f, j under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances^stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of rowdy sheet opened by the 4th respondent against the petitioner in Pedakakani Police Station in pursuance of the proceedings of the 3^^ respondent in C.No.30/BCS/SDPO-North/GTRrUj/2017 dated 20-09-2017, pending disposal of Writ Petition.

¶406

lA NO: 2 OF 2018

¶407

C ^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to interfere in any manner with the life and liberty of the petitioner on the basis of the rowdy sheet opened by the 4th respondent in Pedakakani Police Station, Guntur District in pursuance of the proceedings of the 3rd respondent C.No.30/BCS/SDPO-North/GTR (U)/2017 dated 20-092017 and not to compel or summon the petitioner to come to the Pedakakani police station Pedakakani, Guntur District pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIMHACHALAM BARAPAREDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶408

WRIT PETITION NO: 16140 OF 2018

¶409

Between: Nandamuru Mur^i Nagendra Venkata Satya Varaprasad alias Murali, S/o S.V.B. Mohan Rao Age 47 years. Business, Gunupudi, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. ' ^ ...Petitioner

¶410

AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Home Department, Amaravathi Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Eluni, West Godavari District, 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narsapuram, West Godavari District. 4. The Station House Officer, Town Police Station, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District.

¶411

...Respondents

¶412

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or orders, direction or directions, writ or writs particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any appropriate writ to declare the action of respondents in opening and continuing the rowdy sheet No.470 of 2013 of 1 Town Police Station, Bhimavaram is illegal, arbitrary and against the provisions of the A.P. Police Manual and Article 14, 19 (1) (g), 21 and 26 of the Constitution of India.

¶413

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶414

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the rowdy sheet No.470 of 2013 of I Town Police Station, Bhimavaram, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition No of 2018.

¶415

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K L N SWAMY

¶416

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶417

WRIT PETITION NO: 19664 OF 2018

¶418

Between:

¶419

Chiluka Vinod Kumar, S/o Late C. Srinivasulu Aged about 29 years, Occ. Business R/o H.No. 16-41K4, Subbaraupet Nandikotkur Kurnool District

¶420

...Petitioner

¶421

AND

¶422

The Station House Officer, Nandikotkur police station Nandikotkur Kurnool District 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Atmakur Kurnool District 3. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool Kurnool District. 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District

¶423

...Respondents

¶424

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in opening and continuing the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner in the 1 St respondent police station even though the petitioner is not a habitual offender as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Orders and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner continuing in the 1=‘ respondent police station in the interest of justice.

¶425

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶426

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station or disturb the personal liberty of the petitioner on the ground of pendency of Rowdy Sheet in the 1^' respondent police station without following due process of law pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice.

¶427

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶428

WRIT PETITION NO: 26388 OF 2018

¶429

Between:

¶430

Ramireddy Madhava Reddy, S/o. Chinna Narsimha Reddy, Aged. 39 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 3-55, Revanoor Village, Koilkuntia Mandal, Kurnool^District.

¶431

...Petitioner

¶432

AND

¶433

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Allagadda, Kurnool^District. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Koilkuntia Circle, Kurnool District. 5. Sub-Inspector of Police, Revanoor Police Station, Kurnool^District.

¶434

...Respondents

¶435

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening the Rowdy Sheet bearing No. 49 against the Petitioner at 5th Respondent Police Station, as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and violative of Article-21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to remove the rowdy sheet bearing No. 49 against the Petitioner.

¶436

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶437

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the rowdy sheet against the petitioner bearing No. 49 at 5^*^ Respondent Police Station, Koilakuntia Circle, Kurnool District pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶438

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PONAVOLU SUDHAKARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶439

WRIT PETITION NO: 33412 OF 2018

¶440

Between:

¶441

Kota Anjaiah, S/o Venkateswara Rao, aged about 45 years, R/o Challapalli, challapalli Mandal, Krishna District.

¶442

Bellamkonda Yesu, S/o Shankar, aged about 44 years, R/o Challapalli, challapalli Mandal, Krishna District.

¶443

Bellamkonda Pothuraju, S/o Shankar, aged about 45 years R/o Challapalli, challapalli Mandal, Krishna District.

¶444

Bathula Srinu @ Chanti, S/o Rathaiah, aged about 46 years, R/o Challapalli, challapalli Mandal, Krishna District.

¶445

Somisetti Srinivasa Rao, S/o Nancharaiah, aged about 46 years, R/o Challapalli, challapalli Mandal, Krishna District.

¶446

Bathula Venkata Narayana, S/o Atchiaiah, aged about 43 years R/o Challapalli, challapalli Mandal, Krishna District.

¶447

Muchu Hari Babu @ Hari, S/o Vasantha Rao, aged about 45 years R/o Challapalli, challapalli Mandal, Krishna District. ...Petitioners

¶448

¶449

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Department of Home Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶450

1. The Superintendent of Police, Krishna At Machilipatnam, Krishna^District. 3. Sub Divisional Police Officer, Avanigadda, Krishna^District. 4. The Station House Officer, Challapalli, Challapalli Mandal, Krishna District

¶451

...Respondents

¶452

¶453

lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to call the petitioners to the police station pending disposal of the above writ petition in this Hon'ble Court. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GHANTASALA UDAYA BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents; GP FOR HOME

¶454

WRIT PETITION NO: 34026 OF 2018

¶455

Between:

¶456

SK.MuslimNagurBazar,MeeranSatenapalliShaik, Town,S/o Ibrahim,Guntur DistrictAged aboutA.P. 48 years, Occ. Social Activist R/o 27^^ Ward ' ...Petitioner

¶457

AND

¶458

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Prl. Secretary to Government, Home Home Department, Block, Ground Floor, Room No. 185, A.P Secretariat Officer, Velagapudi, Vijayawada.

¶459

The Superintendent of Police(Rural), Guntur District,^AP 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sattenapalle, Guntur District, AP 4. The Station House Officer, Sattenapalle Town P.S, Guntur District, AP.

¶460

...Respondents

¶461

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order more particuiarly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS the action of the respondents in particular Respondent No 3 and 4 of opening of Rowdy sheet and continuing the same in the List of Rowdy Sheet in the Police Station of the 4th Respondent without issuing any Notice or conducting any enquiry in violation of Standing Order No.601 of the Andhra Pradesh Police Manual Standing Orders as illegal, void, without jurisdiction, violative of principles of natural justice and also in violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the Respondents and award Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs) as damages to the Petitioner on account of loss of repptationl for opening Rowdy-Sheet and grant.

¶462

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶463

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No 3 to remove the petitioner name from list of Rov/dy Sheet, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VI3AY BHASKAR KAKUNOOR B Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶464

WRIT PETITION NO: 34212 OF 2018

¶465

Between:

¶466

Gedala Ganeswara Rao, S/o Markendeyulu, Aged about 55 years, R/o Plot No.7, Maruthi Nagar, Phoolbagh, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. ...Petitioner

¶467

AND

¶468

The State of Andhra pradesh. Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶469

The Director General of Police, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Commissioner of Police, Visakahapatnam City, Visakhapatnam District. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakapatnam District. 5. The Station House Officer, Arilova P. S, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District

¶470

...Respondents

¶471

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned rowdy sheet / history sheet issued by the 5'^ respondent vide No. 01/2018 opened against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, without jurisdiction and against the principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the history sheet No.01/2018 opened by the 5 th respondent against the petitioner.

¶472

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶473

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the history sheet No.l /2018 on the file of the 5‘^ respondent, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CHALAKANI VENKAT YADAV Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶474

WRIT PETITION NO: 37364 OF 2018

¶475

Between: Patan Jeelan Basha, S/o Paten Shafi Ulla Khan, Muslim,Aged about 43 Years, R/o D.No.11-1-605, Krupa Nanda Nagar, Anantapuramu, Anantapuramu District. ...Petitioner

¶476

¶477

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, AP Secretariat, Velagapudi,Guntur

¶478

1. The Superintendent of Police, Anantapur, Anantapur^District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ananntapur Town, Anantapur, Anantapuraamu District.

¶479

1. The Circle Inspector of Police, Anantapuramu II Town Police Station, Ananntapur Town, Anantapur, Anantapuraamu District

¶480

1. The Station House Officer, Anantapuramu II Town Police Station, Ananntapur Town, Anantapur, Anantapuraamu District

¶481

...Respondents

¶482

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 5 in opening of Rowdy sheet no-473, against the petitioner on the file of Anantapuramu II Town Police Station. Ananntapur Town, Ananntapur District, is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the A Police Standing Order, 742 and also contrary to the Division Bench Judgments of the Hon'ble High Court reported in 2004(1)ALD (Crl) 387 and other Judgment reported in 1998 (3) ALT 55 (DB) and to set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 5 not to harass the petitioner by calling the petitioners to his police station in pursuance of the Rowdy sheet No 473, against the petitioner on the file of Anantapuramu II Town Police Station,

¶483

9-^

¶484

Ananntapur Town, Anantapur District, for putting signatures and to take photographs and putting finger prints etc, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶485

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOTHAPALLI RAM MOHAN CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶486

WRIT PETITION NO: 38091 OF 2018

¶487

Between:

¶488

Makkena Prakash, S/o Makkena Prasadarao, Age 38 years, Occ. Document Writer, R/o H.No.l816/A, Mangalagiri Municipal Road, Mangalagiri Town, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner

¶489

AND

¶490

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its PrI. Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶491

The Superintendent of Police (Urban), Guntur District,^{AtGuntur.AndhraPradesh.} 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, North Division, Guntur Urban, At Mangalagiri, Guntur ' District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Station House Officer, Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur Urban District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶492

...Respondents

¶493

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in opening and maintaining Rowdy sheet against the petitioner in Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur Urban District, Andhra Pradesh, as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 19, and 21 of Constitution of India, and consequently to direct the respondents No. 2 to 4, to close the rowdy sheet which was opened and maintaining against the petitioner in Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur Urban District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶494

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶495

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 2 to 4, not to harass the petitioner by calling him to the police station of Mangalagiri Town, on the pretext of rowdy sheet, forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition before this Hon'ble court.

¶496

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI Dr CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶497

WRIT PETITION NO: 39402 OF 2018

¶498

Between:

¶499

Geddam Harandh Rao, S/o. Late Venkata Narayana Aged about 43 years, Occ. Editor, Maneeseema, R/o. Seethampeta, Srikakulam District Village and Mandal,^{SrikakulamDistrict.}

¶500

...Petitioner

¶501

AND

¶502

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Station House Officer, PS. Seethampeta, Srikakulam^District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palakonda,^Srikakulam District. 4. Mrs. Swaroopa Rani, W/o. Not known to Petitioner Presently working as DSP of Palakonda, Srikakulam District. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam.

¶503

...Respondents

¶504

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent nos. 2 and 3 herein in opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner herein as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to the Police Standing order and also violation of Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and it is also further prayed that the action of the respondent no.3 herein in subjecting the petitioner to the mental torture and illegal detention as illegal and against the law and violation of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and it is also further prayed that to declare the action of the respondent no.2 and 3 herein unnecessarily calling to the police station and detaining for hours together without due process of law or notice as illegal and against the law and consequently it is prayed this Honble Court may be pleased to declare the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner herein as illegal, arbitrary and against the law.

¶505

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶506

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to call the petitioner herein to the respondent nos.2 and 3 herein police station without due process of law and in accordance with law pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V RAGHUNATH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶507

WRIT PETITION NO: 40083 OF 2018

¶508

Between:

¶509

Rayala Narasimha Rao, S/o Venkat Rao Aged about 42 yrs, Occ. Agriculture R/o Munnaluru village Kanchikacherla Mandal Krishna District

¶510

...Petitioner

¶511

AND

¶512

The Station House Officer, Kanchikacherla police^{stationKrishnaDistrict.} 2. The Inspector of Police, Kanchikacherla Circle Kanchikacherla Krishna District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandigama Krishna^District. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, Krishna^District. 5. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District.

¶513

...Respondents

¶514

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in opening the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner in the 1st respondent police station even though the petitioner is not the habitual offender involving in breach of peace and public tranquility as prescribed under Police Standing Order No.601 as arbitrary, illegal, violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet pending against the petitioner in the 1st respondent police station in the interest of justice.

¶515

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶516

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner on the ground of pendency of the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner in the 1®‘ respondent police station pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶517

WRIT PETITION NO: 41677 OF 2018

¶518

Between:

¶519

Pasupuleti Samba Siva Rao, S/o. Siva, aged 31 years, Occ. Business, R/o. D.No.25-17-343/45, Srinivasa Rao Thota, 60 feet Road, Opp. Sujatha Convent, Guntur, Guntur District -522004. ...Petitioner

¶520

AND

¶521

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Home Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Amaravati. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban, Guntur^District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban East, Guntur City, Guntur District. 4. The Station House Officer, Nagarampalem Law and Order Police Station, Guntur, Guntur District

...Respondents

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.CHAKRAPANI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶528

WRIT PETITION NO: 19616 OF 2022

¶529

Between:

¶530

Chitturi Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Achutharamayya, aged 48 years. Occupation. Cultivation, R/o. Kulla Village, Gangavaram Mandal, Konaseema District. ...Petitioner

¶531

AND

¶532

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.

¶533

The Deputy Superintendent Police-cum-Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Ramachandrapuram, Konaseema District.

¶534

The Superintendent of Police, Konaseema District.

¶535

The Station House Officer, Pamarru Police Station, located at Gangavaram, Konaseema District.

...Respondents

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an interim direction against the respondents to immediately remove my name from the lists of any " KD's, Suspects or Rowdy Sheets" in the notifications that are being published by it anywhere including the police station during the pendency of this Writ Petition.

¶540

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶541

WRIT PETITION NO: 21953 OF 2022

¶542

Between:

¶543

Shaik Mahabub Basha@ Gottala Basha, S/o Jamel Shaheb, aged about 45 years, Occ: Daily Basis Worker, Resident of Pothuraju Mitta, Islam Peta, Kandukuru Town, SPSR Nellore District. ...Petitioner

¶544

AND

¶545

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department A.P.

¶546

Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District

¶547

The Superintendent of Police, Nellore Town, Nellore^District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kandukuru Town, Kandukuru, Nellore District. 4. The Station House Officer, Maddipadu, Prakasam District. 5. The Station House Officer, Kandukuru Town, Kandukuru,^{NelloreDistrict.}

¶548

...Respondents

¶549

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in opening and continuing the suspect sheet No. 575 on the file of the Kandukuru Town Police Station is highly illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also the law laid declared by the Hon'ble High in W.P.No. 3568 of 2022 and batch consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 forthwith close the suspect sheet No. 575. lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶550

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 2 and 5 not to interfere with my life and liberty under the guise of the continuance of suspect sheet against me on the file of the 5'*^ Respondent Police Station pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOMARA PRUDHVI RAJ Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶551

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING COMMON ORDER:

¶552

CMR, J. W.P.No.35895 of 2014 & Batch

¶553

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

¶554

Writ Petition Nos.35895 of 2014; 11009, llOll of 2016; 161, 1672, 1918, 2570, 3058, 4155, 4438, 5194, 5880, 6432, 7726, 9276, 10342, 10948, 13753, 15200, 17404, 18424, 22592, 22630, 34335, 34446, 35061, 37968, 41977, 42140, 42465, 42856, 42913, 42916, 42917, 42975, 44416 of 2017; 11374, 16140, 19664, 26388, 33412, 34026, 34212, 37364, 38091, 39402, 40083, 41677 of 2018; 19616 and 21953 of 2022

¶555

COMMON ORDER:

¶556

In this batch of Writ Petitions, the petitioners sought^either to quash the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets that are opened against them or to direct the respondent police officials to close the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/historysheets.

¶557

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing^forthe respondents.

¶558

These Writ Petitions are being disposed of without going into the merits of the cases on the ground of legal validity^ofthesaid rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets opened by invoking the provisions of A.P. Police Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders, in view of the recent common order of this High Court, dated 15.07.2022, in W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and batch, whereby this Court held that the Standing Orders of A.P. Police^Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders to the extent of opening/continuatioⁿ

¶559

of rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets and keeping surveillance om the individuals on the basis of the said rowdy/

¶560

CMR, J. W.P.No.35895 of 2014 & Batch

¶561

sheets/suspect-sheets/histoiT-sheets, i m terms of Chapter-37 of the aforesaid Standing Orders, are void.

¶562

The rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/hi istory-sheets were opened against the petitioners in all these Writ Petition s in terms of Chapter-37 of the A.P. Police Standing Orders or A.P. Police Manual. 5. The legal validity of Chapter-37 of the said A.P. Police Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders, on the basis of which the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets are being opened, has been questioned and challenged before this Court in W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and batch. This court, by its common order, dated 15.07.2022, passed in the above batch of Writ Petitions, after considering the law on the issue elaborately with reference to the earlier Judgments rendered by the Apex Court and. more particularly, with reference to the Constituti on Bench judgment of the Apex Court rendered in the case of K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India., held that Chapter-37 of the A.P. Police Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders on the basis of which the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/h istory-sheets are being opened and surveillance is being kept on the individuals on the basis of the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/hiistory-sheets. as void. At para.45 of the said common order, it is held as follows; ‘45) Hence, the Writ Petition No.3568 of 2022 is allowed declaring the Standing Orders of A.P. Police Manual / A.P. Police Standing Orde rs to the extent of opening/continuation of Rowdy Sheet, Suspect Sheet, History Sheet etc., and on that basis the surveillance of the individual (in terms of Chapter 37 (2017) 10 see 1

¶563

3 CMR, J. W.P.No.35895 of 2014 & Batch

¶564

of the above said Standing Orders) as void. All the other Writ Petitions are also allowed. All the rowdy sheets opened in this batch of Writ Petitions are directed to be closed immediately. The police cannot open or continue a rowdy sheet or collect data pertaining to a person without the sanction of law”. Collection of personal data and its usage for prevention of crimes also can only be in accordance with a “law” which crosses the thresholds mentioned in the Constitution of India and the various judgments including K.S.Puttaswamy case (2 supra) since ‘privacy’ is now a F\md^mlental Right as per PartIll of the Constitution of India. It is reiterated that the police cannot (under the existing orders) indulge in night visits; domiciliary visits to the houses of a suspect or accused. They cannot take • or demand the photographs, fingerprints etc., except under the procedure established by a ‘law’ and if the conditions laid down are satisfied. Accused or suspects cannot be summoned or called to the Police Station or ani^where else either during festivals/elections/weekends etc. They cannot be made to wait at the Police Stations for any reason or seek permission to leave the local Jurisdiction.

¶565

¶566

Therefore, as the very Chapter-37 in the A.P. Police Manual and A.P. Police Standing Orders, on the basis of which all the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets are opened and surveillance is being kept on the petitioners on the basis of the said the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets and the same are being continued, is now declared as void, the opening of the said the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets against the petitioners and continuing the same is clearly^{unsustainable} under law. They have no legal sanctity and they cannot be sustained under law and they cannot be allowed to be in force and continued any longer.

¶567

¶568

Therefore, in view of the aforesaid common order, dated 15.07.2022, of this Court and for the reasons stated therein.

¶569

CMR. J. W.P.No.35895 of 2014 & Batch

¶570

these Writ Petitions are allowed declaring the opening of the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets against the petitioners, which are all impugnedi in these Writ Petitions, as illegal and unconstitutional. Consequently, all the rowdysheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets, opened against the petitioners in these Writ Petitions, stand closed forthwith. The respondents in all these Writ Petitions are directed to close the the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets in their records which are opened against the petitioners. No surveillance shall be kept on the petitioners herein on the basis of the said the rowdysheets/suspect-sheets/histoiy-sheets and the petitioners shall not be called to the Police Station in connection with any such rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets. which are now declared as illegal and unconstitutional and which are closed. No costs.

¶571

Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any. shall also stand closed.

¶572

Sd/- P.VENKATA RAMANA JOINT REGISTRAR

¶573

//TRUE COPY//

¶574

Pf OFFICER

¶575

To The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Avanigadda,^Krishna District. 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Madhurawada Zone, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ongole town, Ongole Prakasam District. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, West Zone, Vijayawada. 5. The Assistant Superintendent of Police, Pulivendula,^{Y.S.R.KadapaDistrict.} 6. The Asst. Superintendent of Police, Kadapa sub Division,^Kadapa. 7. The Circle Inspector of Police (Station House, Officer), Kadiyam Police Station, Kadiayam, East Godavari District. 8. The Circle Inspector of Police, Anantapuramu II^{TownPoliceStation,AnantapurTown,} Anantapur, Anantapuraamu District 9. The Circle Inspector of Police, Kaligiri Circle,^{Kaligirl,S.P.S.R.NelloreDistrict.} 10. The Circle Inspector of Police, Koilkuntia Circle,^{KurnoolDistrict.} 11. The Circle Inspector of Police, Proddatur Rural,^{ProddaturTown,YSRKadapaDistrict.} 12. The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada. 13. The Commissioner of Police, Visakahapatnam City, Visakhapatnam District. 14. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Ongole town,^Ongole Prakasam^District 15. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gudivada,^{KrishnaDistrict,} 16. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Office, of^{theDy.S.P,NearGovt.ESIHospital} Adoni, Kurnool District - 518 301 ' 17. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ananntapur^{Town,Anantapur,Anantapuraamu} District.

¶576

18.	The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Atmakur Kurnool District
19.	TheDeputySuperintendentofPolice,Avanigadda, ^{Krishna District.}
20.	TheDeputySuperintendentofPolice,BapatiaSub-Division,Bapatia,GunturDistrict
21.	The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Central Zone, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District.
22.	The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban East, GunturCity,GunturDistrict.
23.	The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
24.	The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kandukuru Town, Kandukuru, Nellore District.
25.	The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandigama Krishna ^District.
26.	The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narsapur, West Godavari District.
27.	TheDeputySuperintendentofPolice,Narsapuram,West Godavari District.
28.	The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Dy.S.P, Near Govt. ESI Hospital, Adoni, Kurnool District - 518 301.
29.	TheDeputySuperintendentofPolice,Palakonda,Srikakulam ^District.
30.	The Deputy Superintendent of Police; West Division, Guntur Town, Guntur.
31.	TheDeputySuperintendentofPolice.,KavaliDivision,Kavali,S.P.S.R.NelloreDistrict
32.	The Deputy Superintendent Police-cum-Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Ramachandrapuram, Konaseema District.
33.	The Divisional Police Officer - cum -Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District at Eluru.
34.	The Inspector of Police Yerraguntia, Kadapa Dist.
35.	TheInspectorofPolice,ChallapalliP.S,KrishnaDistrict, ^{Andhra Pradesh.}
36.	The Inspector of Police, Kanchikacherla Circle Kanchikacherla Krishna District.
37.	The Inspector of Police, Nagarampalem circle, Guntur, Guntur ^District.
38.	The Inspector of Police, P.S. Challapalli, Krishna ^District.
39.	The Inspector of Police, Pedakakani Police Station, Pedakakani, Guntur District. Andhra Pradesh.
40. 41.	The Inspector of Police, Rompecherla Police Station, Rompecherla, Guntur, Guntur Dist The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District
42.	The Station Achanta Police Station, Achanta West Godavari ^District.
43.	The Station House Officer Mogaltur Police Station, Mogaltur,WestGodavariDistrict.
44.	The Station House Officer, Adavuladeevi Police Station, ^{Guntur District.}
45.	The Station House officer, Adoni I Town Police Station, Kurnool Dist.
46.	The Station House officer, Adoni II Town Police Station, ^{Kurnool Dist.}
47.	The Station House Officer, Adoni II Town Police Station, ^Kurnool Dist.
48.	The Station House Officer, Adoni III Town Police Station, Kurnool District.
49.	The Station House Officer, Anantapuramu II Town Police Station, Ananntapur Town, Anantapur, Anantapuraamu District
50.	The Station House Officer, Arilova P. S, Visakhapatnam, VisakhapatnamDistrict
51.	The Station House Officer, Bhimavaram I Town Police Station, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District.
52.	TheStationHouseOfficer,Challapalli,ChallapalliMandal,KrishnaDistrict.
53.	The Station House Officer, Gudivada Taluk Police Station, Gudivada, Krishna District.
54.	The Station House Officer, Guntur - Town P.S, Guntur ^District.
55.	The Station House Officer, II, Town Police Station, Vijayawada.
56.	The Station House Officer, Kanchikacherla police station ^{Krishna District}
57.	The Station House Officer, Kandukuru Town, Kandukuru, ^{Nellore District.}
58.	The Station House Officer, Kondapuram Police Station, Kondapuram. S.P.S.R.Nellore District.
59.	TheStationHouseOfficer,KuppamPoliceStation,Chittoor^District.
60.	TheStationHouseOfficer,Maddipadu,PrakasamDistrict.

¶577

¶578

61.	The Station House Officer, Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur Urban District AndhraPradesh. ' ’
62.	The Station House Officer, Nagarampalem Law and Order Police Station, Guntur GunturDistrict '
63.	TheStationHouseOfficer,NandikotkurPoliceStationNandikotkurKurnoolDistrict
64. 65.	The Station House Officer, P.M.Palem Police Station, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam The Station House Officer, Palakoderu Police Station, Palakoderu, West Godavari District.
66.	The Station House Officer, Pamarru Police Station, located at Gangavaram, Konaseema District.
67.	TheStationHouseOfficer,PattabhipuramPoliceStation,GunturUrbanDistrict
68.	The Station House Officer, Pedakakani Police Station, Pedakakani, Guntur District AndhraPradesh.
69.	The Station House Officer, Pedapudi Police Station, Pedapudi (V) and (M), East Godavari District.
70.	TheStationHouseOfficer,PoliceStationKandukur,KandukurTown&Mandal
	PrakasamDistrict.
71.	The Station House Officer, Police Station; Khajipet, Y.S.R.KadapaDistrict.
72. 73.	The Station House Officer, Police Station; Pulivendula, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. TheStationHouseOfficer,PS.Seethampeta,SrikakulamDistrict.
74.	The Station House Officer, Rajamahendravaram III Town, Law & Order Police Station Rajamahendravaram,EastGodavariDistrict.
75.	The Station House Officer, Rayavaram Police Station, Rayavaram, East Godavari District.
76.	The Station House Officer, Sattenapalle Town P.S, Guntur District,AP.
77. 78.	The Station House Officer, Tadimarri Police Station, Anantapur District. TheStationHouseOfficer,TalukPoliceStation,Ongole,
79.	Prakasam District.
80.	The Station House Officer, Town Police Station, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District TheStationHouseOfficer,’Vayalpadu,ChittoorDistrict.
81.	TheStationhouseOfficer,KavaliTown,SPSRNellore^Dist.
82.	The Sub Divisional Police Officer, North Sub-Division, Guntur Urban, Guntur District Andhra Pradesh.
83.	TheSubDivisionalPoliceOfficer,ProddaturDivision,Proddatur,YSRKadapaDistrict
84. 85.	The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Vijayawada, Krishna ^District. The Sub Inspector of Police Kalamalla Police station.
86. 87.	The Sub Inspector of Police Yerraguntia, Kadapa Dist., TheSubInspectorofPolice,ChapaduPoliceStation,
88.	Chapadu, YSR Kadapa District The Sub Inspector of Police, Kuppam Police Station, Chittoor District.
89.	TheSubinspectorofPolice,NagarampalemP.S.,Guntur,GunturDistrict
90. 91.	The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sattenapalle, Guntur District, ^AP TheSub-DivisionalPoliceOfficerKavalf,SPSRNellore
92.	Dist. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Allagadda, Kurnool District.
93.	The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Dy. Superintendent of Police, Narasapur Sub-Division Narasapur,WestGodavariDistrict. '
94.	The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Madanapalle, Chittoor District.
95.	The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, North Division, Guntur Urban, At Mangalagiri, Guntur District,AndhraPradesh.
96.	TheSub-InspectorofPolice,KadiyamPoliceStation,
97.	Kadiyam, East Godavari District
98.	The Sub-Inspector of Police, Revanoor Police Station, Kurnool District TheSuperintendofPolice,EastGodavariDistrict,Kakinada,E.G.Dist
99.	The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District, Machilipatnam.
100. 101.	The Superintendent of Police Kadapa Dist. TheSuperintendentofPolice(Rural),GunturDistrict, ^AP
102.	TheSuperintendentofPolice,Anantapur,Anantapur^District.
103.	TheSuperintendentofPolice,ChittoorDistrict.
104.	The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District, ^{at Kakinada.}
105. 106.	The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, West Godavari District, TheSuperintendentofPolice,GunturUrban,GunturDistrict.
107.	The Superintendent of Police, Konaseema District.
108.	TheSuperintendentofPolice,KrishnaAtMachilipatnam,KrishnaDistrict
109.	TheSuperintendentofPolice,KrishnaDistrict,atVijayawada.
110.	TheSuperintendentofPolice,Kurnool,Kurnool
111.	District. The Superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, Krishna ^District.
112. 113.	The Superintendent of Police, Nellore Town, Nellore District. TheSuperintendentofPolice,PrakasamDistrict
114.	at Ongole. The Superintendent of Police, Rajamahendravaram Urban, Rajamahendravaram East
115.	Godavari District. TheSuperintendentofPolice,Srikakulam.
116.	The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakapatnam District
117.	One CC to SRI. A K KISHORE REDDY Advocate [OPUCl
118. 119.	One CC to SRI. A P REDDY Advocate [OPUC] OneCCto SRI.BSNNAIDUAdvocate[OPUC]
120.	One CC to SRI. B SARVOTHAM REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
121.	OneCCto SRI.BVRAMARAOAdvocate[OPUC]
122.	One CC to SRI. CH RAMAKRISHNA Advocate [OPUC]
123. 124.	One CC to SRI. CHALAKANI VENKAT YADAV Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI. DHANA LAKSHMI TALL7\PALEM Advocate [OPUC]

¶579

¶580

125. 126.	One CC to One CC to	SRI. Dr CHALL71 SRINIVASA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] SRI.GHANTASALA.UDAYABHASKARAdvocate[OPUC]
127.	One CC to	SRI. JANARDHANA REDDY PONAKA Advocate [OPUC]
128.	One CC to	SRI.KLNSWAMYAdvocate[OPUC]
129.	One CC to	SRI.KRAMACHANDRAAdvocate[OPUC]
130.	One CC to	SRI. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Advocate [OPUC]
131.	One CC to	SRI.KSRINIVASAdvocate[OPUC]
132.	One CC to	SRI.KVLNARASIMHAFtAOAdvocate[OPUC]
133.	One CC to	SRI.KALLATULASIDURGAMBAAdvocate[OPUC]
134.	One CC to	SRI.KOMARAPRUDHVIRAJAdvocate[OPUC]
135.	One CC to	SRI.KOTHAPALLIFLAMMOHANCHOWDARYAdvocate[OPUC]
136.	One CC to	SRI.MASHAKEELAdvocate[OPUC]
137.	One CC to	SRI.MKARIBASAIAHAdvocate[OPUC]
138.	One CC to	SRI.NPARAMESWARAREDDYAdvocate[OPUC]
139.	One CC to	SRI.NSRIHARIAdvocate[OPUC]
140.	One CC to	SRI.NVRAMARNATHAdvocate[OPUC]
141.	OneCCto	SRI.PBHAKTHAVATSALAdvocate[OPUC]
142.	One CC to	SRI.PNAGENDRAREDDYAdvocate[OPUC]
143.	One CC to	SRI.PAVULURISREENIVASULUAdvocate[OPUC]
144.	One CC to	SRI.PONAVOLUSUDHAKARAREDDYAdvocate[OPUC]
145.	One CC to	SRI.PRUDHVIRAJMUDUNURIAdvocate[OPUC]
146.	One CC to	SRI.RAJANDRAMLAWFIRMAdvocate[OPUC]
147. 148.	One CC to One CC to	SRI. RAJA GOPALA RAO HANUMANTHU Advocate [OPUC] SRI.RAMARAOMAVIDIAdvocate[OPUC]
149.	One CC to	SRI.SCHAKRAPANIAdvocate[OPUC]
150.	One CC to	SRI. S DUSHYANTH REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
151.	OneCCto	SRI.SSRIDHARAdvocate[OPUC]
152.	One CC to	SRI.SIMHACHALAMBARAPAREDDYAdvocate[OPUC]
153.	One CC to	SRI.SYEDKHADERMASTANAdvocate[OPUC]
154.	One CC to	SRI. T V JAGGI REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
155.	One CC to	SRI. V RAGHUNATH Advocate [OPUC]
156.	One CC to	SRI.VENKATESWARLUSANISETTYAdvocate[OPUC]
157.	One CC to	SRI.VIJAYBHASKARKAKUNOORBAdvocate[OPUC]
158.	One CC to	SRI.YKOTESWARRAOAdvocate[OPUC]
159. 160.	Two CCs to TwoCDCo	GP for Home, High Court of AP. [OUT] pies

RAM

HIGH COURT

DATED:22/07/2022

COMMON ORDER

WRIT petition No.:35895 of 2014: 11009. 11011 of 2016: Ifil, 1672. 1918, 2570, 3058, 4155. 4438, 5194. SRRn, 6432, 7726. 9276, 10342. 10948. 13753. 15200, 17404. 18424, 22592, 22630. 34335. 3444fi, 35061. 37968. 41977. 421An, 42465, 42856. 42913. 42916 42917, 42975. 4441 fi of 2017; 11374. 16140. 19664^ 26398, 33412. 34026. 37364. 38091. 39402. 40083 41677 of 2018: 19616 anrt 21953 of 2022

¶587

JIX 2 1 AUG 202'»
Wo Co.
, Current Section ^

¶588

ALLOWING THE ALL WP's WITHOUT COSTS

Nusam Ramana Reddy, v. The State of A.P. rep. its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nusam Ramana Reddy, v. The State of A.P. rep. its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Rajinikanth, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

P. Devaraj, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Malladi Yedukondalu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Jujjavarapu Srihari Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

K. Kannan, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Bellary Khader Basha,S/O. Tajuddin, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh