The writ petition was closed as the counsel submitted that the cause did not survive due to subsequent developments.
Writ Petition and pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.19864 OF 2022
Between:-
B.Viswanadha Reddy
… Petitioner
and
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Medical & Health, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District and others
… Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners : Mr.Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava
Counsel for respondent No.1 : G.P. for Medical & Health Counsel for respondents 2 to 4: Mr.Chittem Venkata Reddy Counsel for respondent No.5 : G.P. for Finance & Planning
ORDER :
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments, the cause in the writ petition does not survive. The submission is recorded.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. Miscellaneous
applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J
October 14, 2022. vasu
B.Viswanadha Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh
NINALA JAYASURYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
