the order impugned in the present writ petition and raised grounds gives scope for drawing an inference about malafides on the part of the third respondent. The soldiers in Army are working at a distant place from their families sometimes alone, without any support either morally or physically, sometimes those places are not accessible to general public with a fear of insecurity and threat to the family members. That is reason for providing the policy to assign land to serving soldiers to create a secured life atleast in future while in service or after discharge from the Army service. But, to frustrate such security in future, the third respondent acted in such manner and exhibited certain malafides by the show cause notice, impugned order and counter affidavit, perhaps at the instance of Respondent No.8 who is competing with the petitioner for allotment of land being an ex-serviceman. If, for any reason, the request of Respondent No.8 was not attended by the revenue authorities, his application can be considered and allotment can be made, subject to his eligibility. But, at the instance of Respondent No.8, got issued legal notice dated 12.07.2014 Mr. Mahaboob Basha, High Court Advocate. The respondents are not expected/supposed to take such decision to entertain suo motu revision after lapse of five years, though no time limit is prescribed, but, it appears that it is reasonable.
