Constitution of India and the same have to be proved during enquiry to be conducted as per clause 8(4) of the Control Order and law laid by this Court in B.Manjula v. District Collector, Civil Supplies, Kurnool and others1 , Pidikiti Sailaja v. State of A.P2 and C.Durga Srinivas Rao and others vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and others . Therefore, this Court, in the interests of justice, felt it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the 4th respondent to complete the final enquiry as contemplated under the provisions of clause 8(4) of Control Order, 2018, and as per the law laid down by this Court in the aforesaid decisions , by conducting enquiry to prove the charges against the petitioner by adducing evidence and give an opportunity to the petitioner to cross examine the witness and to defend the petitioner’s case in the enquiry and pass orders as expeditiously as possible, within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. In the event the enquiry as directed above is not completed within the stipulated time aforesaid, the impugned order shall stand suspended and the petitioner’s authorization of shop No.0605015, Eturu Village, Chandralapadu Mandal, Krishna District shall be restored and the petitioner shall be supplied essential commodities to distribute the same to the cardholders.
