A writ petition was dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner informed the Court that a related appeal had been disposed of in the District Registrar office, rendering the current petition stale.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.12391 of 2015
ORDER :
It is brought to the notice of this Court by Sri Murali Lincoln, learned counsel for the petitioner that pending this writ petition, Appeal No.3 of 2015 on the file of learned District Registrar, Visakhapatnam, was disposed of, challenging which the petitioner has also filed W.P.Nos.41920, 41921 and 41922 of 2015, which are pending for consideration and stated that this writ petition has become infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
Date : 17.11.2022 ARR
2
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.12391 of 2015
Date : 17.11.2022
ARR
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
