Writ petition dismissed as infructuous because no cause survives for further adjudication. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions closed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.11225 of 2015
ORDER:
At the time when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. Manikyavalli, representing Sri K. Ramakoteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that in the present writ petition no cause survives for further adjudcation.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall
stand closed.
________________ V. SUJATHA, J
Date: 10.11.2022.
ASH
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
W.P. No.11225 of 2015
Date:10.11.2022
ASH
Sri K. Ramakoteswara Rao
Manikyavalli
V. SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
