Writ Appeal dismissed as appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal, which was granted. Liberty to file review petition was accorded.
Permission accorded to withdraw Writ Appeal with liberty to file review petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.V.S.S. SOMAYAJULU
WRIT APPEAL No.567 OF 2022
(Through physical mode)
Bollini Prasad Naidu, S/o Subramanyam Naidu, aged about 45 years, R/o Ravillavari Kandriga Village, Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District.
..Appellant
Versus
The State of A.P, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj, Velagapudi, Amaravati, and others.
…Respondents
Counsel for the appellant : Mr. A. Chandraiah Naidu.
Counsel for respondent No.1 : GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development.
Counsel for respondent No.2 : GP for Revenue.
Counsel for respondent No.3 : Mr. V. Vinod K. Reddy, standing counsel
ORAL JUDGMENT
Dt:05.07.2022
(per Prashant Kumar Mishra, CJ)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant
seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal reserving liberty to
the appellant to prefer review petition before the learned single Judge.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn granting
liberty as prayed for. No costs. All pending miscellaneous applications shall stand dismissed.
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CJ D.V.S.S. SOMAYAJULU, J
Nn
Bollini Prasad Naidu
State of A.P
Prashant Kumar Mishra
D.V.S.S. Somayajulu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
