during the pendency of the suits filed by mortgagees against R4/D1, who also shown Indian Overseas Bank as D2 in the suits. Admittedly, D2 bank sold entire property of R4/D1/mortgager by invoking provisions of Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFACIE Act). Thereafter, Indian Overseas Bank sold entire property of R4/D1 in public auction, got sale proceeds of Rs.5,34,50,000/- and then appropriated their dues and deposited the balance amount of Rs.3,54,41,556/into the Court by filing interpleadary suit in O.S.No.20 of 2011 on the file of same Court and the said suit was dismissed on 23.12.2013 and thereafter, revision petitioners herein having filed individual petitions in their suits,sentfordifferent amounts which are due by R4/D1 basing on mortgage andsaidamounts are lying in the suits filed by the revision petitioners, which prima facie shows that portion of amounts sent for by revision petitioners in ten original suits referred above, which is portion of amount in respect of sale of entire mortgaged property of R4/D1. Admittedly, revision petitioners herein are not mortgagees of entire property and they are mortgagees of portion of properties, whereas proposed parties are though subsequent mortgagees, it is for entire property of R1/R4, which sold by the bank invoking provisions of SARFACIE Act,whichshowsthat the portion of sale proceeds sent for from inter-pleadary suit filed by
