An accused seeking quashing of an FIR filed for cheating and criminal breach of trust. The Court rejected relief as investigation was at inception and dismissed the petition, directing issuance of notices under Section 41A CrPC.
Criminal Petition dismissed; investigation to continue; notice issued under Section 41A CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8279 of 2022
ORDER:
The petitioner is accused No.5 in Crime No.429 of 2022 on the file of Vedayyapalem Police Station, SPSR Nellore District, for offences under Sections 420, 408 r/w 34 IPC.
1 2014(8) SCC 273
2
officer and shall also issue notice under Section 41A of Cr.P.C to
the petitioner.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall
stand closed.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
15.11.2022 RJS
3
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8279 of 2022
15.11.2022
RJS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether quashing of the FIR is appropriate at the inception of investigation where general allegations exist against the accused.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of BiharReferred¶7
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar 2014(8) SCC 273 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner (Accused No.5)
State
R. Raghunandan Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
