Court disposed of a Criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC without examining merits. Directed police to follow Section 41A CrPC procedure for arrest as alleged offences carry less than seven years imprisonment.
Directed police to follow procedure contemplated under Section 41A of CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.717 of 2018
ORDER:-
The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed to quash the proceedings in F.I.R.No.23 of 2018 of Tuni Rural Police Station, East Godavari District. A case has been registered against the petitioners/A1 to A3 for the offences punishable under Sections 323 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SCs and the STs (PoA) Amendment Act, 2015, (Act 1/2016).
arguing for some time, confined his arguments to the
2
extent that since the offences alleged are punishable with less than seven years imprisonment, police be directed to follow procedure as contemplated under Section 41A of Cr.P.C.
Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and another”1 .
is disposed of.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the
Criminal Petition, shall stand closed.
_________________________________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Date: 05.09.2022 KLPD
1 (2014) 8 SCC 273
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY
Criminal Petition No.717 of 2018
Date: 05.09.2022
KLPD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether police be directed to follow procedure as contemplated under Section 41A of Cr.P.C. since offences alleged are punishable with less than seven years imprisonment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and anotherDistinguished¶10
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and another
4 provisions across 3 enactments
A1 to A3
2nd respondent/complainant
K. SREENIVASA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
