In Contempt Case No.381 of 2007, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh (Amaravati) closed proceedings due to the petitioner's absence, though he had a cause of action stemming from a writ petition.
Closed proceedings with liberty to revive if the cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE
CONTEMPT CASE No.381 of 2007
(Through physical mode)
Sunkara Srinivas, Rep. by his father Sunkara Koteswara Rao, Hindu, aged 55 years, Nidamanuru Village, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District.
…Petitioner
Versus
K. Gangachalam, The Competent Authority, M/s. Reliance Gas Pipelines Limited (Formerly : Gas Transportation and Infrastructure Company Limited) D.No.59-1-21A, Road No.5, Ramachandra Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
… Respondent/ Contemnor Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. J. U. M. V. Prasad Counsel for the respondent : --
ORDER (ORAL)
Dt: 17.06.2022
This Contempt Case has been preferred seeking the following
relief:
“… to punish the respondent under Secs.10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for willful violation of the orders of this Hon’ble Court in W.P.No.3292 of 2007 both dt.20-02-2007 and 15-03-2007 and consequently direct the respondent to pay the damages worth of Rs.50,00,000/- in the interest of justice.”
2
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CJ
AMD
3
94
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE
CONTEMPT CASE No.381 of 2007
Dt: 17.06.2022
AMD
Sunkara Srinivas
K. Gangachalam
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
